Author Topic: 2013 Recruiting Thread (Read 965370 times)

pvegs · « **Reply #3500 on:** June 14, 2013, 04:51:31 PM »

Oregon makes sense, too. They don't have a lot coming back and had success with Kazemi as a one year player last season.

Mixed-Nutz · « **Reply #3501 on:** June 18, 2013, 07:17:39 PM »

Quote

@GoodmanESPN: Oregon landed commitment from ex-Iowa St. signee Richard Amardi, source told ESPN. 6-8 forward played at Indian Hills. Has one year to play.

scottwildcat · « **Reply #3502 on:** June 18, 2013, 07:31:43 PM »

lol eff

wabash909 · « **Reply #3503 on:** June 18, 2013, 09:28:04 PM »

Wow, these guys are terrible.

CNS · « **Reply #3504 on:** June 18, 2013, 09:30:12 PM »

Is it officially burnt down? No?

Sent from my KFTT using Tapatalk 2

Dr Rick Daris · « **Reply #3505 on:** June 18, 2013, 09:31:37 PM »

Quote from: CNS on June 18, 2013, 09:30:12 PM

Is it officially burnt down? No?

Sent from my KFTT using Tapatalk 2

we haven't seen 5-6 years of oscar as a coach, so no. sorry cns.

Tobias · « **Reply #3506 on:** June 18, 2013, 09:34:42 PM »

like, you can put your #gottlieb4ksu headbands in the attic, but keep them kinda by the door

wabash909 · « **Reply #3507 on:** June 18, 2013, 09:55:11 PM »

The fact that they failed to even get a visit is comical.

PIPE · « **Reply #3508 on:** June 19, 2013, 10:02:16 AM »

Man, we can't even pick up other teams' trash.......Now, I don't mean to bag on this fellow, but any player we are trying to get for next year this late who hasn't signed w/ anyone, I consider trash.

Maybe Currie should be lead recruiting when it is late in the game, since he likes digging through the trash

Man, I am in a bad mood today.....

Dr Rick Daris · « **Reply #3509 on:** June 19, 2013, 10:05:51 AM »

he's the one person on iowa states team that they decided they no longer wanted and not only did we want him, we couldn't get him. just let that sink in for a bit.

Mixed-Nutz · « **Reply #3510 on:** June 19, 2013, 11:03:20 AM »

I don't know why anybody would thinks loosing a JUCO recruit that has one year to play is a big deal. The problem wasn't going to be solved by Amardi.

Panjandrum · « **Reply #3511 on:** June 19, 2013, 11:21:03 AM »

Quote from: rick daris on June 19, 2013, 10:05:51 AM

he's the one person on iowa states team that they decided they no longer wanted and not only did we want him, we couldn't get him. just let that sink in for a bit.

CNS · « **Reply #3512 on:** June 19, 2013, 11:22:59 AM »

Quote from: Mixed-Nutz on June 19, 2013, 11:03:20 AM

I don't know why anybody would thinks loosing a JUCO recruit that has one year to play is a big deal. The problem wasn't going to be solved by Amardi.

Quote from: rick daris on June 19, 2013, 10:05:51 AM

he's the one person on iowa states team that they decided they no longer wanted and not only did we want him, we couldn't get him. just let that sink in for a bit.

kslim · « **Reply #3513 on:** June 19, 2013, 11:34:07 AM »

Quote from: rick daris on June 19, 2013, 10:05:51 AM

he's the one person on iowa states team that they decided they no longer wanted and not only did we want him, we couldn't get him. just let that sink in for a bit.

"it hurts, it hurts bad"-steve zissou

wabash909 · « **Reply #3514 on:** June 19, 2013, 12:00:52 PM »

Quote from: Mixed-Nutz on June 19, 2013, 11:03:20 AM

I don't know why anybody would thinks loosing a JUCO recruit that has one year to play is a big deal. The problem wasn't going to be solved by Amardi.

It's a big deal because we don't have any big men on our roster other than 6'-6" Thomas Gipson.

But, yes, as long as we're fine with assembling a roster to play in the Big XII that doesn't include a big man or any big man depth in 2013, then this isn't really a big deal.

'taterblast · « **Reply #3515 on:** June 19, 2013, 12:02:21 PM »

we have DJamer

CNS · « **Reply #3516 on:** June 19, 2013, 12:03:14 PM »

Guys, it has noting to do with the individual player or his position. It has to do with the fact that we are in the position of need we are in, that it is as late in the offseason as it is, and that even trash doesn't want to come here.

Quit focusing on the individual and their individual ability. It's bigger than that.

Mixed-Nutz · « **Reply #3517 on:** June 19, 2013, 12:49:53 PM »

Quote from: wabash909 on June 19, 2013, 12:00:52 PM

Quote from: Mixed-Nutz on June 19, 2013, 11:03:20 AM
I don't know why anybody would thinks loosing a JUCO recruit that has one year to play is a big deal. The problem wasn't going to be solved by Amardi.

It's a big deal because we don't have any big men on our roster other than 6'-6" Thomas Gipson.

But, yes, as long as we're fine with assembling a roster to play in the Big XII that doesn't include a big man or any big man depth in 2013, then this isn't really a big deal.

With or with out Amardi we are going to have to play 4 a guard system. I don't think Amardi was going to be better than a DJamer with marginal improvements. The lack of big depth was created along time ago before Fincher didn't qualify or before we didn't land a JUCO big. Weber really needed Diaz to be better or needed very good big in the 2012 class. Neither he had much control over. He could of also landed an elite big this year, but we all know that wasn't going to happen.

salcat · « **Reply #3518 on:** June 19, 2013, 01:18:33 PM »

Nkosi Ali??? Hahaha

scottwildcat · « **Reply #3519 on:** June 19, 2013, 02:07:01 PM »

sys · « **Reply #3520 on:** June 19, 2013, 02:42:05 PM »

Quote from: wabash909 on June 19, 2013, 12:00:52 PM

as long as we're fine with assembling a roster to play in the Big XII that doesn't include a big man or any big man depth in 2013, then this isn't really a big deal.

our 2013 guards aren't that great either.

EMAWzified · « **Reply #3521 on:** June 19, 2013, 03:10:55 PM »

I detect some stirring of unease among the tuck. But tuck will probably have to suffer through a couple of near last-place finishes before the synapses align.

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #3522 on:** June 21, 2013, 10:45:33 AM »

Quote from: sys on June 19, 2013, 02:42:05 PM

Quote from: wabash909 on June 19, 2013, 12:00:52 PM
as long as we're fine with assembling a roster to play in the Big XII that doesn't include a big man or any big man depth in 2013, then this isn't really a big deal.

our 2013 guards aren't that great either.

No, but at least they exist.

sys · « **Reply #3523 on:** June 21, 2013, 11:19:36 AM »

Quote from: Nuts Kicked on June 21, 2013, 10:45:33 AM

they exist.

seems to be about all that's required for kstate fans to think they're good recruits.

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #3524 on:** June 21, 2013, 03:24:45 PM »

Quote from: sys on June 21, 2013, 11:19:36 AM

Quote from: Nuts Kicked on June 21, 2013, 10:45:33 AM
they exist.

seems to be about all that's required for kstate fans to think they're good recruits.

Depends on the fan, but this is true, by and large.