Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Let this sink in, dax the denier just posted a photoshopped time magazine cover as proof that global warming is a hoax by the Chinese
Links to those headlines? Must have been a lot of them to make such an impression on you and not just one article once that the author retracted a year later
LOL, AGW propagandists (like you) have been trying to make this go away for years.
LOL, you're implying that global warming propagandist articles (white papers) are not ever retracted and that there hasn't been a steady admission that the models were way off.
Dax, do you think science changes based on new information? Or do you view science as static? What about Exxon admitting that CO2 is heavily impacting climate change?
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/exxon-knew-about-climate-change-almost-40-years-ago/
You're so dumb, you don't get that I basically just showed that science changes all the time. That's why your propaganda that the "science is settled" on AGW is patently absurd and anti-science.
Dax, what do you think of Pruitt saying that Trump and the administration have created 50k coal jobs since taking office? Any opinion on Pruitt appointing Oil/Gas/Extraction/Production lobbyists to the EPA?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2017/06/06/pruitts-claim-that-almost-50000-jobs-have-been-gained-in-coal/
https://www.ecowatch.com/pruitt-patrick-traylor-2440855827.html
Considering that after trillions have been spent on renewables and it still accounts for less than 5% of the worlds power. What idiots like you don't get is, your renewable utopia will be built on the back of fossil fuels.
But I'm just remembering that people like you laugh at the concept of energy poverty while systems that receive more government subsidies than any other energy producing system (taxpayer money on top of the monthly bill) is still meeting so little of the worlds energy demands.
Links to those headlines? Must have been a lot of them to make such an impression on you and not just one article once that the author retracted a year later
LOL, AGW propagandists (like you) have been trying to make this go away for years.
LOL, you're implying that global warming propagandist articles (white papers) are not ever retracted and that there hasn't been a steady admission that the models were way off.
Refresh me, please. Are there posters on here that think climate change isn't happening? Or do they just believe it isn't caused by man?
In true shill fashion, the deniers are now pivoting to climate change may be real but not significantly affected by man. And when that fails they then move to their next argument that china/india/developing countries are way worse so why should we change our lifestyles/society here in the west. And when that fails then they argue if you don't live completely off-grid, ride a bike everywhere, only eat vegan, then you are hypocrite and shouldn't even try to live a cleaner life. And when that fails they say the collection data and models are flawed, despite many studies and science refuting their claims. And on, and on, and on.
But really what it all boils down to is that they are change-averse. They can't handle having to adjust their decisions/lives or having the government put in place regulations that force them to think about the impacts of the status quo. They grasp with all their might to save 50k coal jobs, dying industries, and nostalgia to a bygone era when you could burn tires in your back yard, fill up with leaded gasoline, and sit by grandpas bedside while he died of black lung.
Sad. Almost feel bad for them. My only solace is that they will soon die and not have to bear the discomfort of having to breathe clean air or drink clean water... And we can all move on from their willful ignorance and join the rest of the modern world, embracing technological progress, alternative energy, building efficiency, and sustainability.
RIP deniers.
LOL, the simple facts are the biggest advocates of AGW, are also some of the biggest individual consumers of fossil fuels on the planet. Always willing to hop into airplanes and fly all over the planet to tell everyone else how they need to live their lives. But I digress.
Just because you want to hook your wagon to an utterly meaningless Paris Accord which affords absolutely ZERO accountability to some of the biggest polluters (countries) on the planet, doesn't mean it shouldn't be subjected to the scorn and ridicule it so rightly deserves.
As we've discussed. AGW propagandists are once again being shown trying to play both sides of the coin in order to advance their political agenda.
Refresh me, please. Are there posters on here that think climate change isn't happening? Or do they just believe it isn't caused by man?
Bernie Sanders quote defending himself.
"I’m not the most religious of folks. I don’t know if heaven exists. But if it does, then everybody has the right to eternal life there. Nobody should be “condemned” just because he doesn’t have enough money or the right skin color or doesn’t believe in the God who is Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Whoever God is, I am certain that he/she/zir will save everyone, and nothing will ever convince me otherwise, not even God explicitly telling me that those who reject the salvation of Jesus will not be saved."
Give a man enough rope...
Looks like another Federal investigation is headed towards ProgLib hero Bernie Sanders and family.
Where did you read that at, Dax?
Infowars? Breitbart? Some militant preppers facebook group?
Well CAM... blah blah blah.... libtard... blah blah blah... SOCIALISTS!!!!!... blah blah blah... #chemtrails.... blah blah blah... #sandyhoax.
Looks like another Federal investigation is headed towards ProgLib hero Bernie Sanders and family.
Cam, the 1st amendment is about the gov not making any church or religion the official state religion. It means you can't force people to tithe or endorse one faith or another in order to hold office. Its also about the protection of worshipers of either Jesus or Alah or whomever can do so without government interference. It doesn't mean that if you hold the belief that one faith is more true than another then you cannot serve on as a public figure. That's where Sanders was treading on thin ice. He essentially said "your religion, do you believe it to be more true than others?" and if the answer was yes then he was going to go after him a bit.
Do you want a representative that believes (contrary to the constitution) that one person is inferior to another based solely on religious belief?
The "thin ice" is when you legislate legal discrimination under the guise of "religious liberty"
See, really rough ridin' juvenile.
Good thing this country was founded as one nation under God.
Dwight added that to the pledge in the 50s.
CAM just spews forth every conceivable form of broad brush prejudiceComing from you and FSD...
Sad
How is Bernie like 90 years old and we just heard about him last year and now all libs think he's the saving grace to man kind? So weird and random. You say free crap and losers raise their ears everywhere. Pretty great platform if you ask me.
Jesus, Bernie's a quack.
What are you mad about now?
CAM may be the biggest gurgling simpleton on this board. Given the competition, that's pretty amazing.
Avoid, deflect and obfuscate... classic Dax.
LOL
Lol, I took you're last idiotic post point by point.
You showed the "depth" of your "intellect" with your "at least it's a start" comment the ended with gurgling gibberish.
A non binding, unenforceable agreement is your definition of a "start". Half of the nations that signed on to the last "binding" climate agreement have already pulled out and the United States never signed on to begin with.
So, please parrot out something that was covered 100 pages ago.
CAM may be the biggest gurgling simpleton on this board. Given the competition, that's pretty amazing.
The United States: Okay we're going to give somebody a lot of money, institute draconian policies that will place many of our citizens in energy poverty while killing economic growth. Even though we don't have the faintest of clues if what we do is going to accomplish anything at all. Oh, and through this process we're going to pump a whole bunch of money into the pockets of a very small handful of new energy oligarchs who are politically connected.
Other noted G7 and developing countries: Okay, sounds great Obama err the United States. Okay, we promise to take these ideas under consideration. We promise to show up at conferences to tell everyone how strongly we are considering making changes. We'll then talk about some long term goals, show some really great power points and then go home and basically do nothing. We'll assign some politicians to some committees and they'll meet (at some really nice hotels and resorts) to talk about things. Oh, but keeping pumping that cash in there United States.
Barrack: Sounds like a great deal!
Quote"I believe there's climate change. I believe there's been climate change since the beginning of time," Walberg said. "Do I think man has some impact? Yeah, of course. Can man change the entire universe? No." He continued: "Why do I believe that? Well, as a Christian, I believe that there is a creator in God who is much bigger than us. And I'm confident that, if there's a real problem, he can take care of it."
nothing to worry about dudes
http://time.com/4800000/tim-walberg-god-climate-change/