Messages

1

The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Joe's Extremely Aggressive Dog(s)

« on: Today at 03:18:41 PM »

This is rough ridin' ridiculous. This dude shouldn't have dogs. Is there another dog in the country that would be allowed 11 biting incidents?

Commander Biden bites another Secret Service agent, the 11th known incidenthttps://t.co/zb7EJx0KKw

— The Bias (@thebias_news) September 26, 2023

Does Joe Biden have the capability to control anything at all in his life? He seems like he would be a really shitty neighbor.

2

The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: CoronaBro Meltdown/SARS-Covid-19 Spitballing Thread

« on: Today at 03:04:20 PM »

I got the initial chip from Pfizer in May of 2021 and haven't got another since. I got delta variant 6 months later near thanksgiving and haven't had covid for I guess 22 months.  Is the scientific data saying my delta infection and subsequent immunity worthless against current variants?

yes

3

The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: lol @ clay travis master thread

« on: Today at 01:08:39 PM »

Stealing the crap out of that

4

Other Sports (Tiger's Back) / Re: CHIEFS

« on: Today at 01:04:59 PM »

Are celebrities allowed to not have license plates?

have u ever seen a giant farm truck

 
That's a convertible

5

Kansas State Football / Re: Coach Prime

« on: Today at 01:03:21 PM »

I don't think it's going to be pretty. Their lack of depth everywhere and size and talent on the lines isn't going to get better. He knows it too.

Deion Sanders responds to Dan Lanning’s pregame speech:

“You better get me right now. This is the worst we gonna be.” pic.twitter.com/vbKyL4c0pV

— On3 (@On3sports) September 23, 2023

6

Jerome Tang Coaches Kansas State Basketball / Re: Leaked! FULL BASKETBALL SCHEDULE!

« on: Today at 12:52:13 PM »

I really really really really really hope they go to a 20 game conference schedule next season. An 18 game basketball schedule is nearly equivalent to the SEC's 8 game football schedule.

7

Jerome Tang Coaches Kansas State Basketball / Re: Pay Tang

« on: Today at 12:49:49 PM »

I'm guessing he thinks it's too low of a barrier for him to be poached

Yeah, the higher you make that number the higher you have to make the per year salary and the other side of that buyout. Also having, a let's say a $10 million dollar payout for Tang to get out, won't deter anyone we'd be worried about poaching him, if they wanted him.

Giving your head coach a huge buyout because you are scared he's going to get poached is the easiest and most common way that athletic departments get stuck with underperforming coaches who had one or two good years but were never able to replicate it.

8

Kansas State Football / Re: ITT We document the ascendence of Lance Liepold: Future BiG head coach

« on: Today at 12:44:28 PM »

You could make a fairly strong argument that the KU job is better than the MSU job right now.

you could but only if you ignored the ten year $95 million dollar contract that msu signed with their former coach.

Their current list of realistic candidates certainly doesn't scream premier CFB destination. MSU AD obviously brings in more top line revenue from the delta in conference media deals but it isn't radically different.  The MSU job is probably still better just given it is in a P2 conference but I think MSU's outlook is very similar to Nebraska in the current CFB landscape.

Yes, they will absolutely hire a worse coach than Lance, as they did when they hired Mel Tucker after he went 5-7 at Colorado, in his only season as head coach.

9

Kansas State Football / Re: ITT We document the ascendence of Lance Liepold: Future BiG head coach

« on: Today at 12:41:30 PM »

You could make a fairly strong argument that the KU job is better than the MSU job right now.

I agree with you. Michigan State certainly has more money but he clearly has more clout at KU, a presumably good relationship with his boss, and a much easier path to the CFP.

Lance would take most of his staff with him, if history is any indication. But I don't think he's leaving.

I can't imagine a scenario in which Lance leaves and KU allows Kotelnicki to go with him.

10

Kansas State Football / Re: Coach Prime

« on: Today at 12:36:37 PM »

Mir acting like it’s his first time hearing how coaches motivate


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If you think that all coaches motivate their players by talking about other coaches you're the naive one, boss. You think Nick Saban wasted 2 seconds talking about Lane Kiffin before kickoff and at halftime? Man, I can hear Chris Klieman tearing the paint off the walls of the locker room spitting bars about Gus Malzhan. He's jealous, it's nothing more than that.

There's a 0% chance you don't understand the difference between Lanning motivating his players to play Coach Prime and Chris Klieman motivating his players to play Gus Malzahn.

Well we have that in common because there's a 0% chance you know what I know. There's also a 100% chance that I've heard and seen Deion and Saban speak about this multiple times. The quotes were there for you to find too, probably should have taken 5 seconds to look before you hopped on my nuts and make me the subject of this conversation.

“Even when I played, everybody thought I talked,” said Sanders, a Pro Football Hall of Famer. “I never talked (negatively about opponents). I just really had a good time with the media, and I talked about me. I never spoke of my opponent. You can’t find one clip of me ever speaking negatively or about my opponent, period. I don’t believe in that. I don't condone that.”

Herbstreit noted a unique policy Saban has that again puts him in a class by himself from other programs.


“If you really look at Nick Saban objectively, how can you not appreciate not just the greatness, recruiting and development, but how many times did you watch Alabama trash talk Ohio State during that game? They don’t do it,” Herbstreit said on the latest episode, per 247sports. “I even asked him on that call (after the game) … ‘I don’t tolerate it. I tell them when they show up, and in practice, that we don’t talk to the opponent. That’s our one rule when it comes to that. You aren’t allowed to talk to your opponent.’ And if you watch Alabama, they don’t just beat you. They do it in a way that is respectful.”

Yeah, I guess I don't know for a fact that Klieman didn't talk crap about Malzahn, but I'm real comfortable that he didn't.

11

Kansas State Football / Re: Coach Prime

« on: Today at 12:28:06 PM »

I’m a layperson. I have zero idea how common this type of pre-game trash talking is. Is this a perfectly normal amount?

The players crap talking other players? Yeah, completely normal.

12

Essentially Flyertalk / Re: Can we talk Seals (sea lions)?

« on: Today at 09:03:55 AM »

My family and I visited this beach. We saw a guy nearly get bitten by a seal because he got too close and didn't heed the seal's warnings.

Popular southern California beach indefinitely shut down to protect sea lions https://t.co/c0ZGybXRbs pic.twitter.com/pQZ1I9qycX

— New York Post (@nypost) September 26, 2023

13

Other Sports (Tiger's Back) / Re: CHIEFS

« on: Today at 08:40:36 AM »

Are celebrities allowed to not have license plates?

14

Jerome Tang Coaches Kansas State Basketball / Re: Pay Tang

« on: Today at 08:39:26 AM »

Seems like the buyout is bad for KSU

How so?

15

Kansas State Football / Re: snowbrag master thread

« on: September 25, 2023, 11:44:26 PM »

So is Georgia ranked 0 or…?

Nm just saw where you said they are at 27 lmaooo

They've played one of the worst schedules in college football and haven't been terribly convincing while doing so. If I had a poll vote I wouldn't put them in my top 5.

16

Jerome Tang Coaches Kansas State Basketball / Re: Pay Tang

« on: September 25, 2023, 08:59:10 PM »

So how steep is the buy-out number?

Good buyout for both parties

Under the new deal, Tang would owe the school $6 million if he were to leave for another job after this season, and that number drops by $1 million each spring. If Kansas State were to terminate Tang's contract without cause before April 30, 2025, it would owe him north of $15 million. That number drops by approximately $2.5 million each spring.

17

Kansas State Football / Re: Funny things from UCF 2023

« on: September 25, 2023, 08:52:53 PM »

Is there video of this corn eating contest? I didn't get to watch the game because they were playing in the same time slot as KU/BYU.

If someone has a video, please DM it to spracne and don't post it here.  It was upsetting.

:waiting:

It was an in stadium promotion during the first media timeout. I assume and hope like hell it wasn't televised.

18

Kansas State Football / Re: Funny things from UCF 2023

« on: September 25, 2023, 08:51:22 PM »

I liked that Willie played Rock/Scissors/Paper with the Golden Knight mascot pregame.

That was cute

19

The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: These are the life and times of #blueanon/#blueanongE/#armchairneocons/#neocongE

« on: September 25, 2023, 04:57:27 PM »

I'm guessing I'm going to die waiting for where dax found the rebuttal to the research about trans murder rates.

I suppose I'll be waiting forever to get a breakdown of who is committing those murders and the actual details surrounding those cases.

Okay. Let's assume that literally every single trans person killed was murdered in a crime of passion, every single one of them, not a single hate crime committed. You win.

Of course the issue you now have is the woman in that McDonald's tweet, or the research you asked for that I provided, didn't say anything about huntings or hate crimes. I think it's well established that a lot of trans women are killed by lovers. Now the obvious question is that if they are killed by lovers, does that make them less dead?

Now, you've got what you want, are you gonna produce the rebuttals? I know there's no rebutting research, I'm not asking for that. I want to know that the trans women aren't being killed at a higher rate than others talking point isn't a rogue dax talking point.

I have already rebutted the concept of a ridiculous broad brush statement of "stop killing us".  You have further hammered home that there is literally nothing even remotely approaching a "genocide" against trans people in this country. 

Why don't you ask, why would a corporation sign on to such a broad brush marketing tactic when 99.99999% of their constituency (and the rest of the world) isn't even remotely engaged in anything that even sniffs murder? Or violence against trans people and in the vast majority of cases the activity is isolated to domestic internal situations.

Thus it is absolutely befitting The Life and Times of #blueanon/#blueanongE

The only person fixated on who is killing them is you. I was trying to give you an avenue to walk out of this without sounding like a transphobic bigot but with each post you're sounding more and more like you're trying to conceal that you've either killed a trans woman or have thought about it. Your insistence on discussing who is killing trans women is at minimum a real weird look.

The fact that you don't want to talk about who is actually doing the killing in the context of a ridiculous broad brush all encompassing statement such as "stop killing us" only doubles down on the fact that you don't really want the answer to that question.

It's literally in a post that you have quoted now three different times.

It's right there in black and white, the only thing you can do now is just eat it and shut the eff up, but you won't, you will absolutely quote, for the fourth time, the thing that you insist I don't want to talk about.

That's the entire point you dumbass.

McDonald's propagated a narrative that clearly says that the general populace/society as a whole is responsible for killing trans people and that trans people are being called en masse . . . and they used a statement which we have seen in places where people are subjugated to true genocide.

The bold part in particular is 1000% not true, at all.  You've only affirmed and reaffirmed that reality today and I thank you for that.

I knew you couldn't help yourself, even when I told you what you were going to do. You are predictable as the sun rising in the east. The bolded part very well may be untrue but no one else is talking about that but you. You've admitted to talking to yourself on this board, not the least bit surprising that you're now arguing with yourself too.

20

The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: LOL DEMOCRATS

« on: September 25, 2023, 02:47:24 PM »

I wasn't responding to you, or anyone in particular, you rough ridin' whack-a-doo.   It was just a general comment on the reality of this blog.

MIR - Triggered 7/7 (so, the usual)

So you made that comment as a total non sequitur, nothing prompted it at all huh?

yes.

21

The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: These are the life and times of #blueanon/#blueanongE/#armchairneocons/#neocongE

« on: September 25, 2023, 02:45:33 PM »

I'm guessing I'm going to die waiting for where dax found the rebuttal to the research about trans murder rates.

I suppose I'll be waiting forever to get a breakdown of who is committing those murders and the actual details surrounding those cases.

Okay. Let's assume that literally every single trans person killed was murdered in a crime of passion, every single one of them, not a single hate crime committed. You win.

Of course the issue you now have is the woman in that McDonald's tweet, or the research you asked for that I provided, didn't say anything about huntings or hate crimes. I think it's well established that a lot of trans women are killed by lovers. Now the obvious question is that if they are killed by lovers, does that make them less dead?

Now, you've got what you want, are you gonna produce the rebuttals? I know there's no rebutting research, I'm not asking for that. I want to know that the trans women aren't being killed at a higher rate than others talking point isn't a rogue dax talking point.

I have already rebutted the concept of a ridiculous broad brush statement of "stop killing us".  You have further hammered home that there is literally nothing even remotely approaching a "genocide" against trans people in this country. 

Why don't you ask, why would a corporation sign on to such a broad brush marketing tactic when 99.99999% of their constituency (and the rest of the world) isn't even remotely engaged in anything that even sniffs murder? Or violence against trans people and in the vast majority of cases the activity is isolated to domestic internal situations.

Thus it is absolutely befitting The Life and Times of #blueanon/#blueanongE

The only person fixated on who is killing them is you. I was trying to give you an avenue to walk out of this without sounding like a transphobic bigot but with each post you're sounding more and more like you're trying to conceal that you've either killed a trans woman or have thought about it. Your insistence on discussing who is killing trans women is at minimum a real weird look.

The fact that you don't want to talk about who is actually doing the killing in the context of a ridiculous broad brush all encompassing statement such as "stop killing us" only doubles down on the fact that you don't really want the answer to that question.

It's literally in a post that you have quoted now three different times.

It's right there in black and white, the only thing you can do now is just eat it and shut the eff up, but you won't, you will absolutely quote, for the fourth time, the thing that you insist I don't want to talk about.

22

The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: LOL DEMOCRATS

« on: September 25, 2023, 02:35:27 PM »

I wasn't responding to you, or anyone in particular, you rough ridin' whack-a-doo.   It was just a general comment on the reality of this blog.

MIR - Triggered 7/7 (so, the usual)

So you made that comment as a total non sequitur, nothing prompted it at all huh?

Imagine trying to make people think you're a crazy person, muttering to yourself on a message board, all because you're not able to shut the eff up and actually read before posting for like three seconds.

23

Other Sports (Tiger's Back) / Re: CHIEFS

« on: September 25, 2023, 02:24:18 PM »

Next album cover

lol, creepy

24

Kansas State Football / Re: Funny things from UCF 2023

« on: September 25, 2023, 02:13:32 PM »

I can't remember the last time I've seen a team in person that has they kind of speed they have at QB, RB, and WR. Their lines are complete crap. My guess is this is what Colorado looks like in person.

I have seen that type of trick punt return before. We got very lucky that Blumer had a rare good punt. If he had his normal punt we would have been cooked because the unit was absolutely confused. The only person who knew what was going on was the last one who you would think would know what the flight of the punt was and that was Plattner. The big  poin punt allowed him to get down the field and he made a hell of an open field tackle.

That corn eating contest was rough ridin' foul and I wouldn't do that crap in public for some shitty east side club seats.

25

Kansas State Football / Re: Iowa HC’s Idiot Kid Thread

« on: September 25, 2023, 01:50:51 PM »

They've been making deep fake videos of him, here's the latest one

AI Brian Ferentz addresses the shut out at Penn State pic.twitter.com/Hc4Tiq61UA

— Heavens! (@HeavensFX) September 25, 2023