Explain why not?
Because the State of Missouri is not within the geographic footprint of the B12 conference. It really doesn't get any simpler than that.
Name a single Conference Championship that is played in a State outside of the Conference, and I'll promptly shut the hell up. Otherwise, stop posting in this thread.
They are going to have the tournament where they think it will make the most money. It doesn't get any simpler than that. Why is this so hard to understand. If Mizzou left there would be no other conference with the geographical issue that we present here so, there is no precedent. Michigan State and UNC are playing a game on an aircraft carrier in San Diego, does that make geographical sense? Of course not but it makes fiscal sense. These schools and the conference will do what they think makes the most money.
I'm still waiting for someone to explain how the Big 12 would be served by removing the tournament from its most successful site.
How do you know it makes more fiscal sense in KCMO than it does in Dallas or OKC? AAA capacity is 19,200, OKC's Chesapeake Energy Arena (why did they change the name of the Ford Center?) is 18,203, Sprint Center is 18,555. I think both AAA and Chesapeake have more luxury seating than Sprint Center, too. The money would be just as good in Dallas or OKC.