Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I know.Did you know Morehouse is a HBC?This is how I deal with bad news. By masking it like it never happened and turning it into a joke. What a dumb name for a college, right?
Why not just kick him out, wait for the TRO and throw our hands up and say "well we tried"?For several reasons I won't explain here, I don't think it would work to simply expel him, wait to see if he sues, and then reinstate him and assert lack of standing.
cool appreciate the insight
You want to know the reasons?
I'd honestly be curious
I'm trying to gum up threads less with legal stuff, but "capable of repetition yet evading review" and "voluntary cessation" are two related examples of exceptions to the general standing and mootness doctrines. On the former, the idea is that some injuries are necessarily transitory in nature and likely to become unredressable before a case can be finally decided (Roe v. Wade is the classic example). On the latter, a defendant should not be allowed to manufacture mootness by ceasing its bad conduct once a suit is filed only to turn around and do the exact same thing once a case is dismissed as moot. Otherwise, the offensive conduct could never be addressed. Some other stuff too, but I don't want to get into it.
For several reasons I won't explain here, I don't think it would work to simply expel him, wait to see if he sues, and then reinstate him and assert lack of standing.
cool appreciate the insight
You want to know the reasons?
I'd honestly be curious
I'm trying to gum up threads less with legal stuff, but "capable of repetition yet evading review" and "voluntary cessation" are two related examples of exceptions to the general standing and mootness doctrines. On the former, the idea is that some injuries are necessarily transitory in nature and likely to become unredressable before a case can be finally decided (Roe v. Wade is the classic example). On the latter, a defendant should not be allowed to manufacture mootness by ceasing its bad conduct once a suit is filed only to turn around and do the exact same thing once a case is dismissed as moot. Otherwise, the offensive conduct could never be addressed. Some other stuff too, but I don't want to get into it.
YEs. I am still not sure who takes up this little grifter's case. ACLU is the logical choice but maga grifters hate the ACLU.
For several reasons I won't explain here, I don't think it would work to simply expel him, wait to see if he sues, and then reinstate him and assert lack of standing.
cool appreciate the insight
You want to know the reasons?
I'd honestly be curious
For several reasons I won't explain here, I don't think it would work to simply expel him, wait to see if he sues, and then reinstate him and assert lack of standing.
cool appreciate the insight
"still hope from gen-z!"
https://twitter.com/TONYxTWO/status/1275051388431667200
@blacked_com
cops shouldn't have guns
lmao
There are many cops in the western world without guns, dummy. You're right though, it's impractical here though because you dipshit republicans and you gun lust and nra ball juggling.
Why so hostile? Please don't try and compare the U.S. to Iceland or Maldives. And you're right, it is impractical and that was why I had the response that I did. And while I agree that there are plenty of "dipshit pub's that love their NRA" there is plenty of dipshit dem's that love them as well.
How about England, dummy?Even with an armed public, fewer people would die during interactions with the police. People get shot because guns put people on edge.
You are correct, no debate there, but there is no way you are going to find enough cops to work our streets without weapons. There's a constant threat of ambush. The countries like England, the UK, and Norway where the cops don't carry guns, and France where they are essentially never used, there is virtually no threat of the cops encountering someone else with a gun.
I agree that the U.S. is a fundamentally different challenge in that regard. However, I would support a smaller and more selective police force (with guns) and then glorified meter maids (without guns) to perform most of the routine B.S. cops actually do.
I would support this as well. Would obviously be easier in smaller population location although I'm sure there are variables in that too. Not sure how well it would work of populations north of 100,000?
cops shouldn't have guns
lmao
There are many cops in the western world without guns, dummy. You're right though, it's impractical here though because you dipshit republicans and you gun lust and nra ball juggling.
Why so hostile? Please don't try and compare the U.S. to Iceland or Maldives. And you're right, it is impractical and that was why I had the response that I did. And while I agree that there are plenty of "dipshit pub's that love their NRA" there is plenty of dipshit dem's that love them as well.
How about England, dummy?Even with an armed public, fewer people would die during interactions with the police. People get shot because guns put people on edge.
You are correct, no debate there, but there is no way you are going to find enough cops to work our streets without weapons. There's a constant threat of ambush. The countries like England, the UK, and Norway where the cops don't carry guns, and France where they are essentially never used, there is virtually no threat of the cops encountering someone else with a gun.
Lick every post you make is amazing on many levels. The dominate level is stupidityLOL . . . the discussion of testing volume still absolutely holds water. It's also beyond a shadow of a doubt that countries are purposely mis-reporting their positive test numbers.
so name names. which countries would pass the US in cases per capita if they tested more per capita?
I don't know, also, fantastic job (as usual) avoiding all of my questions.
this is an amazing post on so many levels
Are you Ok?!?!?!
wtf you just shot him 8 times
the eff you think
https://www.r-calfusa.com/
Cattlemen group who are not fans of the check off. Butted heads with NCBA in court over it. Proponents of COOL "country of origin labeling"
Great. Glad we agree that tearing down the Grant statue was dumb.yeah, look it's bad and the people that tore down that statue are dumbasses. you don't have to reflexively defend everything that people you perceive as on your side do.
at the same time, it's also counterproductive to malign a movement that's doing a lot of good things just because they aren't doing everything perfectly
whose life is negatively affected by that? much ado about nothing
