goemaw.com
General Discussion => The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit => Topic started by: steve dave on April 15, 2013, 05:06:12 PM
-
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rightwingwatch.org%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2FRushBostonTweet.jpg&hash=b2ae429bf047811d8e32667a15e938190e007b31)
Fox News contributor
-
Shut up, SD.
-
Travis Tannahill ?@Ttannahill80 11m
Remember when GW Bush gave that passionate speech after 9/11 that gave ya chills? Pres O's was the complete opposite.
-
Travis Tannahill ?@Ttannahill80 11m
Remember when GW Bush gave that passionate speech after 9/11 that gave ya chills? Pres O's was the complete opposite.
jfc
-
fox was trying so, so hard to fault Obama for not calling it a terrorist attack
-
fox was trying so, so hard to fault Obama for not calling it a terrorist attack
wasn't just Fox either, CNN had a headline "OBAMA STATEMENT DOESN’T SAY ‘TERROR" before his speech was even over.
-
I have met Travis in real life, he is an okay guy but this really isn't shocking to see coming from him.
Also that Fox News guy needs to just disappear forever.
-
fox was trying so, so hard to fault Obama for not calling it a terrorist attack
wasn't just Fox either, CNN had a headline "OBAMA STATEMENT DOESN’T SAY ‘TERROR" before his speech was even over.
Probably a youtube video that caused it. Looking forward to Obama claiming he did call it a terrorist attack in a few weeks and everyone calling fox news liars for saying he didn't.
Regardless, politicizing this stuff is disgusting
-
If only the people watching the race had guns this could have been avoided. Better yet, if they were allowed to be armed with bombs themselves they could have bombed the bombs and saved some lives.
-
Sd got trolled so hard he's doing the death spin and getting all tangled in the rig.
-
If only the people watching the race had guns this could have been avoided. Better yet, if they were allowed to be armed with bombs themselves they could have bombed the bombs and saved some lives.
:rolleyes:
-
Ban assault bombs
Please think of the children
-
I'm ready to believe that media reaction is partially to blame for these types of events. What can be done to change the coverage that assholes receive for their misdeeds? We can't just rely on the police to disappear suspects without media scrutiny.
Political tint: This loser earned a bunch of guys in Gitmo a healthy sentence extension.
-
I'm ready to believe that media reaction is partially to blame for these types of events.
I think their role is significant, but they are only doing what the public demands. Bet their ratings ($) were really high today.
-
http://www.local15tv.com/mediacenter/local.aspx?videoid=4018426
Real World or Exercise? (NORAD 9/11/01)
-
http://www.local15tv.com/mediacenter/local.aspx?videoid=4018426
Real World or Exercise? (NORAD 9/11/01)
I love how these dbags can ID what type of dogs they are. :flush: I mean JFC these people should be beaten.
-
Travis Tannahill ?@Ttannahill80 11m
Remember when GW Bush gave that passionate speech after 9/11 that gave ya chills? Pres O's was the complete opposite.
Tannahill was what 10 in 2001?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
-
Travis Tannahill ?@Ttannahill80 11m
Remember when GW Bush gave that passionate speech after 9/11 that gave ya chills? Pres O's was the complete opposite.
Tannahill was what 10 in 2001?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
I was 10 in 01 so he was probably 12 or 13
-
Travis Tannahill ?@Ttannahill80 11m
Remember when GW Bush gave that passionate speech after 9/11 that gave ya chills? Pres O's was the complete opposite.
Tannahill was what 10 in 2001?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
I was 10 in 01 so he was probably 12 or 13
I looked it up. He was born in 1990. So, he was 11.
-
Guys they have Youtube and stuff now. You can go back and watch all those old videos. Really cool, check it out sometime.
-
http://www.local15tv.com/mediacenter/local.aspx?videoid=4018426
Real World or Exercise? (NORAD 9/11/01)
I love how these dbags can ID what type of dogs they are. :flush: I mean JFC these people should be beaten.
Is a bomb sniffing dog a "type" of dog? I mean almost any dog can be trained to hit on certain scents, be it drugs or explosives or something else. It's not like there's a certain breed for that. Maybe they were speculating because looking for pot is a weird thing to do at a marathon? :dunno:
-
#prayforafghanistan
"Meanwhile in Afghanistan..."
Man, people are dumb.
-
Real World or Exercise?
"At the starting line this morning, they had bomb sniffing dogs and the bomb squad out there," he said. "They kept announcing to runners not to be alarmed, that they were running a training exercise."
-
#prayforafghanistan
"Meanwhile in Afghanistan..."
Man, people are dumb.
Welp, this board is not as smart as I thought it was.
-
#prayforafghanistan
"Meanwhile in Afghanistan..."
Man, people are dumb.
Welp, this board is not as smart as I thought it was.
Post more updates to your thread.
-
oh i get it now.
-
#prayforafghanistan
"Meanwhile in Afghanistan..."
Man, people are dumb.
Welp, this board is not as smart as I thought it was.
Post more updates to your thread.
If there's anything I hate more than being stereotypical it's being predictable. (yep).
BTW, this one's not even hard. You should feel like a rough ridin' idiot if you believed it.
-
I don't think whether it was a fact or not was important. It was just to illustrate his point.
also a major player is how much media is available. with all the photos and video there is more to cover. just like the Japanese tsunami got so much more coverage than the Indonesian tsunami. because there was so much more pictures and video to show.
-
Seems clear that since the usual overseas suspects have not spoken up and claimed responsibility, this appears to be a home grown bombing.
-
Seems clear that since the usual overseas suspects have not spoken up and claimed responsibility, this appears to be a home grown bombing.
Aren't we surprised that no one has taken responsibility? I mean usually you have three or four different groups saying it was them.
-
Probs in a hospital.
-
Probs in a hospital.
Yeah, but you would think if you're smart enough to make a bomb, you'd be smart enough to be in a secure location when it goes off. Unless he wanted to die and then that's a whole different moster in itself.
-
oh i get it now.
i don't. what is he referring to?
-
Travis Tannahill ?@Ttannahill80 11m
Remember when GW Bush gave that passionate speech after 9/11 that gave ya chills? Pres O's was the complete opposite.
jfc
To be fair, that was a pretty awesome speech. But comparing a speech after yesterday to a speech after 9/11 is so rough ridin' moronic it hurts.
-
Travis Tannahill ?@Ttannahill80 11m
Remember when GW Bush gave that passionate speech after 9/11 that gave ya chills? Pres O's was the complete opposite.
jfc
To be fair, that was a pretty awesome speech. But comparing a speech after yesterday to a speech after 9/11 is so rough ridin' moronic it hurts.
I could be wrong, but I'm guessing tannahill is a bit biased
-
Last I read, he was watching Rick Perry on the hunting channel and tweeting about how he wished Perry was president.
Sent from my KFTT using Tapatalk 2
-
Probs in a hospital.
I meant how other groups who were not involved take credit. Like a freebie attack.
-
Travis Tannahill ?@Ttannahill80 11m
Remember when GW Bush gave that passionate speech after 9/11 that gave ya chills? Pres O's was the complete opposite.
jfc
To be fair, that was a pretty awesome speech. But comparing a speech after yesterday to a speech after 9/11 is so rough ridin' moronic it hurts.
I could be wrong, but I'm guessing tannahill is a bit biased
Well yeah, but Obama's speech wasn't supposed to a be a "rally the whole nation" type deal. An attack like 9/11 is a once in a lifetime thing. The whole nation was scared shitless. Absolutely petrified.
-
http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/worst_reactions_to_the_boston_explosions/
-
Also, WTF is an act of terrorism worth if you're not going to tell the world why you did it? There's either some stuff that hasn't been released yet (like mailed letter/confession/video's) or this really was some hack job from someone terribly bored and depressed and deranged.
-
http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/worst_reactions_to_the_boston_explosions/
Is this the same Salon.com that had a piece titled Let's Hope the Boston Marathon Bomber is a White American?
-
Also, WTF is an act of terrorism worth if you're not going to tell the world why you did it? There's either some stuff that hasn't been released yet (like mailed letter/confession/video's) or this really was some hack job from someone terribly bored and depressed and deranged.
Sounds like they're a complete pussy.
-
Last I read, he was watching Rick Perry on the hunting channel and tweeting about how he wished Perry was president.
Sent from my KFTT using Tapatalk 2
Tannehill is such a stud.
-
http://www.local15tv.com/mediacenter/local.aspx?videoid=4018426
Real World or Exercise? (NORAD 9/11/01)
I love how these dbags can ID what type of dogs they are. :flush: I mean JFC these people should be beaten.
"Bomb spotters" on the roofs? :lol:
-
Man, there is some pretty great stuff from Arabs on twitter about how white these guys are. I'm pretty sure entirety of social media in the middle east has CNN on blast.
-
Man, there is some pretty great stuff from Arabs on twitter about how white these guys are. I'm pretty sure entirety of social media in the middle east has CNN on blast.
Sunil Tripathi
Not arab, not a whitey
also:
http://imgur.com/a/JC98Z
-
@BreakingNews: Authorities say that the 2 Boston bomb suspects are brothers, are legal permanent residents of Chechen origin - @NBCNews, @PeteWilliamsNBC
@BreakingNews: Surviving Boston bombing suspect named as 19-year-old Dzhokhar Tsarnaev - @NBCNews, @AP
-
Man, there is some pretty great stuff from Arabs on twitter about how white these guys are. I'm pretty sure entirety of social media in the middle east has CNN on blast.
Sunil Tripathi
Not arab, not a whitey
also:
http://imgur.com/a/JC98Z
Yeah. Hence the greatness.
-
I'm also really enjoying everyone "calling out the racists who assumed they were Muslim" right now. Really, an amazing day of social media from so many different angles.
-
http://vk.com/id160300242 (http://vk.com/id160300242)
WOW
-
I'm also really enjoying everyone "calling out the racists who assumed they were Muslim" right now. Really, an amazing day of social media from so many different angles.
Here's a completely new direction to enjoy!
House Blend is on the house. Come by and enjoy your free cup before noon today.
if I wasn't up all night watching Boston News I would so be there...can you give mine to a law enforcement personnel in Boston instead?
-
I'm also really enjoying everyone "calling out the racists who assumed they were Muslim" right now. Really, an amazing day of social media from so many different angles.
Here's a completely new direction to enjoy!
House Blend is on the house. Come by and enjoy your free cup before noon today.
if I wasn't up all night watching Boston News I would so be there...can you give mine to a law enforcement personnel in Boston instead?
IF STARBUCKS DOESN'T GIVE FREE COFFEE TO BAHSTAHN CAHPS THEY HATE AMERICA! :horrorsurprise:
-
The bigots have been validated by the identity/origin of these guys. :lol:
-
The bigots have been validated by the identity/origin of these guys. :lol:
CHECHNYA!
-
The bigots have been validated by the identity/origin of these guys. :lol:
CHECHNYA!
Dagestan.
-
Glenn Beck taking the opportunity to do a little BITB'ing:
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/i-dont-bluff-i-make-promises-beck-gives-govt-until-monday-come-clean-about-boston-bombing-co
-
Beck won't do anything
-
Beck won't do anything
he says he has evidence that the falsely accused Saudi national is a bad bad bad bad bad bad badman and it's a government cover up...
-
Glenn Beck taking the opportunity to do a little BITB'ing:
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/i-dont-bluff-i-make-promises-beck-gives-govt-until-monday-come-clean-about-boston-bombing-co
well that should be exciting
-
http://vk.com/id160300242 (http://vk.com/id160300242)
WOW
Dzhokhar's brother is in that video on his page
-
i like that dzhokar was on his russian facebook last night during this stuff. :lol:
-
So apparently Sen. Graham hopes the administration will treat this guy as an enemy combatant if he is captured alive. Think along the lines of those in Gitmo. I feel it is appropriate to remind the masses that white hat guy is a US citizen and probably should not be treated as an enemy combatant if captured alive. He probably should be charged and tried like any US citizen would be.
-
I may be from crazy town, but I don't think we should be treating enemy combatants like we treat enemy combatants.
-
I may be from crazy town, but I don't think we should be treating enemy combatants like we treat enemy combatants.
Yeah, no kidding.
-
Beck won't do anything
I've never heard of that website he is referring to so I'm guessing its mostly publicity for that.
-
So apparently Sen. Graham hopes the administration will treat this guy as an enemy combatant if he is captured alive. Think along the lines of those in Gitmo. I feel it is appropriate to remind the masses that white hat guy is a US citizen and probably should not be treated as an enemy combatant if captured alive. He probably should be charged and tried like any US citizen would be.
Also: https://twitter.com/WillMcAvoyACN/status/325351798221197314
Beck won't do anything
I've never heard of that website he is referring to so I'm guessing its mostly publicity for that.
I listened to his show over Thanksgiving and all he did was sell a book. But I mean, he did a great job, I listened for like two hours.
-
So apparently Sen. Graham hopes the administration will treat this guy as an enemy combatant if he is captured alive. Think along the lines of those in Gitmo. I feel it is appropriate to remind the masses that white hat guy is a US citizen and probably should not be treated as an enemy combatant if captured alive. He probably should be charged and tried like any US citizen would be.
Also: https://twitter.com/WillMcAvoyACN/status/325351798221197314
Beck won't do anything
I've never heard of that website he is referring to so I'm guessing its mostly publicity for that.
I listened to his show over Thanksgiving and all he did was sell a book. But I mean, he did a great job, I listened for like two hours.
Did you buy the book?
-
no, but I kept listening for more hints about what was so amazing. I'm sure he sold a shitload.
-
http://vk.com/id160300242 (http://vk.com/id160300242)
WOW
Oh man, look at the gifts section
[attachment deleted by admin]
-
So has Beck blown this thing wide open yet?
-
So has Beck blown this thing wide open yet?
From what I can find, he just stated that Obama (personally) deported a Saudi National that was injured during the bombing...supposedly the alleged Saudi had een designated as a terrorist by someone in govt.
http://www.mediaite.com/online/glenn-beck-was-saudi-national-deported-by-obama-admin-involved-in-boston-bombing/ (http://www.mediaite.com/online/glenn-beck-was-saudi-national-deported-by-obama-admin-involved-in-boston-bombing/)
Glenn Beck got fat since he was last 'relevant'
-
So has Beck blown this thing wide open yet?
From what I can find, he just stated that Obama (personally) deported a Saudi National that was injured during the bombing...supposedly the alleged Saudi had een designated as a terrorist by someone in govt.
http://www.mediaite.com/online/glenn-beck-was-saudi-national-deported-by-obama-admin-involved-in-boston-bombing/ (http://www.mediaite.com/online/glenn-beck-was-saudi-national-deported-by-obama-admin-involved-in-boston-bombing/)
Glenn Beck got fat since he was last 'relevant'
I bet more people watch glen Beck's internet TV station than watch MSNBC, and I'm sure more listen to his nationally syndicated radio show than watch MSNBC; so I guess it depends on your definition of "relevant".
I find it odd that partitards (partisan people) can turn their blind faith/question everything government switch on and off so easily based on who is in office. To Beck's credit, his switch is stuck on question everything.
-
So has Beck blown this thing wide open yet?
From what I can find, he just stated that Obama (personally) deported a Saudi National that was injured during the bombing...supposedly the alleged Saudi had een designated as a terrorist by someone in govt.
http://www.mediaite.com/online/glenn-beck-was-saudi-national-deported-by-obama-admin-involved-in-boston-bombing/ (http://www.mediaite.com/online/glenn-beck-was-saudi-national-deported-by-obama-admin-involved-in-boston-bombing/)
Glenn Beck got fat since he was last 'relevant'
I bet more people watch glen Beck's internet TV station than watch MSNBC, and I'm sure more listen to his nationally syndicated radio show than watch MSNBC; so I guess it depends on your definition of "relevant".
I find it odd that partitards (partisan people) can turn their blind faith/question everything government switch on and off so easily based on who is in office. To Beck's credit, his switch is stuck on question everything.
Much like FSD, facts for Beck, who needs em, amIright?
http://www.buzzfeed.com/rosiegray/saudi-national-questioned-after-bombing-not-being-deported-b
-
So has Beck blown this thing wide open yet?
From what I can find, he just stated that Obama (personally) deported a Saudi National that was injured during the bombing...supposedly the alleged Saudi had een designated as a terrorist by someone in govt.
http://www.mediaite.com/online/glenn-beck-was-saudi-national-deported-by-obama-admin-involved-in-boston-bombing/ (http://www.mediaite.com/online/glenn-beck-was-saudi-national-deported-by-obama-admin-involved-in-boston-bombing/)
Glenn Beck got fat since he was last 'relevant'
I bet more people watch glen Beck's internet TV station than watch MSNBC, and I'm sure more listen to his nationally syndicated radio show than watch MSNBC; so I guess it depends on your definition of "relevant".
I find it odd that partitards (partisan people) can turn their blind faith/question everything government switch on and off so easily based on who is in office. To Beck's credit, his switch is stuck on question everything.
Much like FSD, facts for Beck, who needs em, amIright?
http://www.buzzfeed.com/rosiegray/saudi-national-questioned-after-bombing-not-being-deported-b
I bet FSD watches more glen beck internet show than you do msnbc.
-
I contend that Beck was never relevant.
-
So has Beck blown this thing wide open yet?
From what I can find, he just stated that Obama (personally) deported a Saudi National that was injured during the bombing...supposedly the alleged Saudi had een designated as a terrorist by someone in govt.
http://www.mediaite.com/online/glenn-beck-was-saudi-national-deported-by-obama-admin-involved-in-boston-bombing/ (http://www.mediaite.com/online/glenn-beck-was-saudi-national-deported-by-obama-admin-involved-in-boston-bombing/)
Glenn Beck got fat since he was last 'relevant'
I bet more people watch glen Beck's internet TV station than watch MSNBC, and I'm sure more listen to his nationally syndicated radio show than watch MSNBC; so I guess it depends on your definition of "relevant".
I find it odd that partitards (partisan people) can turn their blind faith/question everything government switch on and off so easily based on who is in office. To Beck's credit, his switch is stuck on question everything.
So, you're saying GB isn't fat?
-
I contend that Beck was never relevant.
Pretty obvious he wasn't after his huge scoop is just laughed at.
-
I contend that Beck was never relevant.
Pretty obvious he wasn't after his huge scoop is just laughed at.
His Huge, Patently False Scoop no less. Said Saudi isn't being deported...this still won't stop Alex Jones & the rest of the Tin foil hat crew from surely characterizing this as merely a "Change of heart because the truth was close to being discovered."
-
So has Beck blown this thing wide open yet?u
From what I can find, he just stated that Obama (personally) deported a Saudi National that was injured during the bombing...supposedly the alleged Saudi had een designated as a terrorist by someone in govt.
http://www.mediaite.com/online/glenn-beck-was-saudi-national-deported-by-obama-admin-involved-in-boston-bombing/ (http://www.mediaite.com/online/glenn-beck-was-saudi-national-deported-by-obama-admin-involved-in-boston-bombing/)
Glenn Beck got fat since he was last 'relevant'
I bet more people watch glen Beck's internet TV station than watch MSNBC, and I'm sure more listen to his nationally syndicated radio show than watch MSNBC; so I guess it depends on your definition of "relevant".
I find it odd that partitards (partisan people) can turn their blind faith/question everything government switch on and off so easily based on who is in office. To Beck's credit, his switch is stuck on question everything.
Much like FSD, facts for Beck, who needs em, amIright?
http://www.buzzfeed.com/rosiegray/saudi-national-questioned-after-bombing-not-being-deported-b
Are you saying people don't listen/watch Glenn beck? Pretty stupid thought.
Also, your buzz!feed article predates "what beck told his audience" by four days, so there's that.
I'm not going to pretend I read either article. Continue manifesting my unwavering support for Glenn back you stupid little crap.
-
I contend that Beck was never relevant.
Wishful and dangerous.
Read how you may.
-
FSD is so upset, wow. calm down, internet friend.
-
Here is a nice Deadspin article discussing a "Coexist" bumper sticker on the "alleged" hijacked care that certain groups find humorous and ironic, despite it not being true.
http://jalopnik.com/the-coexist-sticker-on-boston-bomber-carjacked-car-is-478736660
The article contains a link to other websites that want this to be true so bad. Also Adam Carolla is a dick.
-
Here is a nice Deadspin article discussing a "Coexist" bumper sticker on the "alleged" hijacked care that certain groups find humorous and ironic, despite it not being true.
http://jalopnik.com/the-coexist-sticker-on-boston-bomber-carjacked-car-is-478736660
The article contains a link to other websites that want this to be true so bad. Also Adam Carolla is a dick.
Yeah! Irony isn't supposed to be funny!
Get a sense of humor you stiff. :roll eyes:
-
Here is a nice Deadspin article discussing a "Coexist" bumper sticker on the "alleged" hijacked care that certain groups find humorous and ironic, despite it not being true.
http://jalopnik.com/the-coexist-sticker-on-boston-bomber-carjacked-car-is-478736660
The article contains a link to other websites that want this to be true so bad. Also Adam Carolla is a dick.
Yeah! Irony isn't supposed to be funny!
Get a sense of humor you stiff. :roll eyes:
Irony is funny, the problem is this was forced irony that was not actually real. Someone tried to create this irony thus making it sad and pathetic. GTFOWTBS
-
Bubbles just brought it to my attention in another thread that he thinks he's right and I'm wrong on our little debate here.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Bubbles, you don't understand what you're reading and should be advised it's illegal to practice law without a license. Dlew is going to ace his crimlaw exam because of my guidance/antagonizing here.
Your welcome in advance,
Sugar Dick, esq.
-
Bubbles just brought it to my attention in another thread that he thinks he's right and I'm wrong on our little debate here.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Bubbles, you don't understand what you're reading and should be advised it's illegal to practice law without a license. Dlew is going to ace his crimlaw exam because of my guidance/antagonizing here.
Your welcome in advance,
Sugar Dick, esq.
you still believe you can legally possess bombs? :dubious:
-
Bubbles just brought it to my attention in another thread that he thinks he's right and I'm wrong on our little debate here.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Bubbles, you don't understand what you're reading and should be advised it's illegal to practice law without a license. Dlew is going to ace his crimlaw exam because of my guidance/antagonizing here.
Your welcome in advance,
Sugar Dick, esq.
you still believe you can legally possess bombs? :dubious:
He's right. I bought six Jägerbombs just this weeks.
-
Bubbles just brought it to my attention in another thread that he thinks he's right and I'm wrong on our little debate here.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Bubbles, you don't understand what you're reading and should be advised it's illegal to practice law without a license. Dlew is going to ace his crimlaw exam because of my guidance/antagonizing here.
Your welcome in advance,
Sugar Dick, esq.
you still believe you can legally possess bombs? :dubious:
He's right. I bought six Jägerbombs just this weeks.
didn't expect the death blow to my case to come from you, cfod.
-
Sorry, moderates like steve dave and myself can't play favorites. We stick to the facts.
-
Sorry, moderates like steve dave and myself can't play favorites. We stick to the facts.
i respect you for that and won't hold it against you.
-
Bubbles just brought it to my attention in another thread that he thinks he's right and I'm wrong on our little debate here.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Bubbles, you don't understand what you're reading and should be advised it's illegal to practice law without a license. Dlew is going to ace his crimlaw exam because of my guidance/antagonizing here.
Your welcome in advance,
Sugar Dick, esq.
you still believe you can legally possess bombs? :dubious:
I believe the word you're looking for is "firearm", at least based on the statute you're erroneously relying on for your incredulous position.
-
Bubbles just brought it to my attention in another thread that he thinks he's right and I'm wrong on our little debate here.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Bubbles, you don't understand what you're reading and should be advised it's illegal to practice law without a license. Dlew is going to ace his crimlaw exam because of my guidance/antagonizing here.
Your welcome in advance,
Sugar Dick, esq.
you still believe you can legally possess bombs? :dubious:
I believe the word you're looking for is "firearm", at least based on the statute you're erroneously relying on for your incredulous position.
federal courts have interpreted that statute to apply to the manufacture and possession of bombs, as well as firearms.
the incredulous position here is that you believe it is legal for someone to have a bunch of readymade explosives in their garage. that is crazy person talk and not crazy in the funny way, but crazy in the ted kyzinski manner.
-
Bubbles just brought it to my attention in another thread that he thinks he's right and I'm wrong on our little debate here.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Bubbles, you don't understand what you're reading and should be advised it's illegal to practice law without a license. Dlew is going to ace his crimlaw exam because of my guidance/antagonizing here.
Your welcome in advance,
Sugar Dick, esq.
you still believe you can legally possess bombs? :dubious:
I believe the word you're looking for is "firearm", at least based on the statute you're erroneously relying on for your incredulous position.
federal courts have interpreted that statute to apply to the manufacture and possession of bombs, as well as firearms.
the incredulous position here is that you believe it is legal for someone to have a bunch of readymade explosives in their garage. that is crazy person talk and not crazy in the funny way, but crazy in the ted kyzinski manner.
Well, Eric Holder (who you no doubt worship) left it out of his indictment, so you should probably shoot him an email and tell him to amend the complaint.
Also, "federal courts have interpreted" is a far cry from blanket illegality, but we don't really need to get into a sophomoric lesson on jurisdiction and binding precedent do we?
I don't think you remember what you're disagreeing with at this point, I'd advise you to reread the foregoing.
-
Just realized the bomb debate has transcended threads :horrorsurprise:
:lol:
-
Bubbles just brought it to my attention in another thread that he thinks he's right and I'm wrong on our little debate here.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Bubbles, you don't understand what you're reading and should be advised it's illegal to practice law without a license. Dlew is going to ace his crimlaw exam because of my guidance/antagonizing here.
Your welcome in advance,
Sugar Dick, esq.
you still believe you can legally possess bombs? :dubious:
I believe the word you're looking for is "firearm", at least based on the statute you're erroneously relying on for your incredulous position.
federal courts have interpreted that statute to apply to the manufacture and possession of bombs, as well as firearms.
the incredulous position here is that you believe it is legal for someone to have a bunch of readymade explosives in their garage. that is crazy person talk and not crazy in the funny way, but crazy in the ted kyzinski manner.
Well, Eric Holder (who you no doubt worship) left it out of his indictment, so you should probably shoot him an email and tell him to amend the complaint.
Also, "federal courts have interpreted" is a far cry from blanket illegality, but we don't really need to get into a sophomoric lesson on jurisdiction and binding precedent do we?
I don't think you remember what you're disagreeing with at this point, I'd advise you to reread the foregoing.
i hardly know a thing about eric holder, but i don't get to listen to rush and sean much anymore. perhaps eric had some other stuff to try him on? did he include charges for the crap he stole from the gas station.
how about a common sense proposition then. here it is: no judge is going to let someone possess a bomb, therefore possessing bombs is illegal.
i'm disagreeing with your statement that it isn't per se illegal for a person to possess a bomb, dumbass.
-
You should immediately delete what you just posted. You are prima facie wrong on all accounts.
-
You should immediately delete what you just posted. You are prima facie wrong on all accounts.
:lol:
-
You should immediately delete what you just posted. You are prima facie wrong on all accounts.
Lol
-
A fool and an idiom.
-
A fool and an idiom.
Please post more legal arguments. Use more terms of art.
-
A fool and an idiom.
Please post more legal arguments. Use more terms of art.
Idiom, not idiot. Well, now idiot as well.
-
A fool and an idiom.
Please post more legal arguments. Use more terms of art.
Idiom, not idiot. Well, now idiot as well.
You read as poorly as you write.
-
Let's try a little social experiment here. FSD, build an improvised explosive device in your garage. Alert me when you are ready so that I can set up webcams before the authorities get to your residence. Surely, since it isn't illegal to possess a bomb, you should have no troubles.
-
Hey idiots, you can buy high explosives over the internet. Hell they sell them at Cabela's.
-
Hey idiots, you can buy high explosives over the internet. Hell they sell them at Cabela's.
Buying things that explode at cabela's and building a bomb are not the same thing.
-
Hey idiots, you can buy high explosives over the internet. Hell they sell them at Cabela's.
Buying things that explode at cabela's and building a bomb are not the same thing.
Wasn't the argument over possession? If not I misunderstood the argument.
-
also gunpowder isn't a high explosive and you can't buy high explosives off the shelf anywhere.
-
also gunpowder isn't a high explosive and you can't buy high explosives off the shelf anywhere.
I wasn't talking about gunpowder.
Tannerite is absolutely considered a high explosive.
-
also gunpowder isn't a high explosive and you can't buy high explosives off the shelf anywhere.
I wasn't talking about gunpowder.
Tannerite is absolutely considered a high explosive.
Thanks for learning me.
Holy crap federal laws allow you to have up to 50 lbs.
Thank god you didn't tell the marathon bombers about this stuff.
-
also gunpowder isn't a high explosive and you can't buy high explosives off the shelf anywhere.
I wasn't talking about gunpowder.
Tannerite is absolutely considered a high explosive.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tannerite#In_the_news (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tannerite#In_the_news)
looks like you can use tannerite for it's intended purpose (target practice), but not for making bombs. seems consistent with my crazy idea that making/possessing bombs is illegal.
-
How do you differentiate between making it for one thing versus another if they are in the same form? Context clues I guess? :dunno:
I mean what's the difference between driving through Times Square with this stuff on your way to a gun range or to harm people?
-
driving through Times Square with this stuff on your way to a gun range
:dubious:
-
driving through Times Square with this stuff on your way to a gun range
:dubious:
There's a gun range at 20th and 5th. It's plausible.
-
driving through Times Square with this stuff on your way to a gun range
:dubious:
There's a gun range at 20th and 5th. It's plausible.
Hmm. That surprises me, but I have VLNYCIQ
-
How do you differentiate between making it for one thing versus another if they are in the same form? Context clues I guess? :dunno:
I mean what's the difference between driving through Times Square with this stuff on your way to a gun range or to harm people?
i don't want or need to walk you through what differences there might be between a 20lb plastic sack of your "high explosive" and something that would be considered a bomb.
hello DHS database. :adios:
-
Bubbles, you're getting bombed here.
-
Hey idiots, you can buy high explosives over the internet. Hell they sell them at Cabela's.
Buying things that explode at cabela's and building a bomb are not the same thing.
Wasn't the argument over possession? If not I misunderstood the argument.
The original argument is whether it's legal to possess "backpack bombs" of the type the Boston guy used.
FSD then (hilariously) asked if backpack bombs are illegal, should cars or liquor also be illegal.
-
No, the argument is memorized on this webpage and goes like this.
Dlew: bombs are illegal in all circumstances
Sugar Dick: without mea culpa or a strict liability statute that's not true
Bubbles: blurb a blurb a boo boo :heavybreathing:
Sugar Dick: toys with bubbles
Dlew: after foolishly disagreeing with Sugar Dicks unobjectionable statement, makes failed effort to reframe argument into what a "bomb" is, while sugar dick pokes fun at bubbles copied and pasted definition of "firearm"
Emo: cleans up scraps
Dlew: final failed attempt to reframe argument, should probably have stayed away
-
Okay, you asked for it. Now I'm going to dig up the actual quotes.
-
im not scraps you hobo :shakesfist:
-
Okay, you asked for it. Now I'm going to dig up the actual quotes.
:runaway:
-
Man. If only that cop had been able to carry his own gun and defend himself, maybe this shooting could have been prevented.
Shut the eff up.
He's right, Guns are too dangerous for cops. We should have them all disarmed.
While we're at it we should pass sweeping pressure cooker and backpack bomb reform to keep this from happening ever again.
I mean, who needs a 6 quart pressure cooker?!?! Clearly an assault-cooker intended for wartime use only.
possessing "backpack bombs" is already illegal.
You're dumb. Absent mens rea or a strict liability statute there is no crime against making a backpack bomb.
The National Firearms Act governs the making, importation, registration, and possession of "firearms," a term that is defined to include "destructive devices," and includes devices in the nature of explosive or incendiary bombs. 26 U.S.C.S. §§ 5845(a), (f); 26 U.S.C.S. §§ 5801-5872 (1988).
You're dumb.
If that's what you think that says, then, unequivocally, the answer to your question is bubbles.
Wow, junior attorney alert. The fed defined firearms to include bombs, so they are illegal, just like long guns.
JFC, this board is full of nitwits.
The next time I fill up my gas can I'll be sure to make sure my "firearm" is transferred through a registered firearms dealer so not to break the law, per the advice of whiz bang goE counsel dlew and bubbles.
crap, I have a bottle of 151 in my liquor cabinet. Am I in violation of the Federal Firearms Act?
The ramset in my garage?
you're good to make all the bombs you want if you lack the requisite mens rea to kill people, FSD.
Thanks for the free legal advice.
that isn't legal advice and it wasn't serious. building bombs is a federal offense.
Regardless, a bunch of half wits will jump on here posting inapplicable shreds of nonsense (similar to what you posted) and through conjecture and ignorance you and dlew will be falsely vindicated. Congrats
that was a copy and paste from a u.s. court of appeals case that said it is illegal to build or possess bombs. i posted it in response to you saying it wasn't illegal to build or possess bombs. who is being ignorant here?
If that's what you think that says, then, unequivocally, the answer to your question is bubbles.
crap, I have a bottle of 151 in my liquor cabinet. Am I in violation of the Federal Firearms Act?
The ramset in my garage?
Do you not think there's a relevant difference between liquor/car and a pressure cooker full of explosives and shrapnel that's all connected to a detonator?
Do you disagree with my original post? If not, then shut up.
If your original post was saying that possession of the device i just described isn't illegal, then yes. I unequivocally disagree.
-
Your summary, shockingly, wasn't exactly accurate. You also came across as a pretty big jerk who didn't know what the hell he was talking about.
Shame on you, FSD.
-
"Memorized"
"Mea culpa"
:D
-
Your summary, shockingly, wasn't exactly accurate. You also came across as a pretty big jerk who didn't know what the hell he was talking about.
Shame on you, FSD.
Looks pretty accurate to me.
I think its time to wrap this up and award points
Sugar Dick: 69
Dlew: 0, but with a wicked scolding on his way out the arena
Bubbles: DNQ
-
"Memorized"
"Mea culpa"
:D
Yeah, I mumped that up pretty bad
-
"Memorized"
"Mea culpa"
:D
Yeah, I mumped that up pretty bad
lol, did you ever.
-
Vindication!
-
Vindication!
thanks for finally tapping out.
-
Pwn3d
-
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2317493/Saudi-official-Kingdom-warned-United-States-IN-WRITING-Boston-Bomber-Tamerlan-Tsarnaev-2012-rejected-application-entry-visa-visit-Mecca-2011.html#ixzz2S0nQMn00
-
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2317493/Saudi-official-Kingdom-warned-United-States-IN-WRITING-Boston-Bomber-Tamerlan-Tsarnaev-2012-rejected-application-entry-visa-visit-Mecca-2011.html#ixzz2S0nQMn00
Oh, hey look, another coverup by the administration. Tell Media Matters to send out the talking points, ASAP, and isolate the president.
-
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2317493/Saudi-official-Kingdom-warned-United-States-IN-WRITING-Boston-Bomber-Tamerlan-Tsarnaev-2012-rejected-application-entry-visa-visit-Mecca-2011.html#ixzz2S0nQMn00
Oh, hey look, another coverup by the administration. Tell Media Matters to send out the talking points, ASAP, and isolate the president.
What are you talking about?
Saudi embassy in Washington D.C. issues denial of account of a senior official who talked to MailOnline
-
It's clear one Saudi is telling the truth and one is not. The Russian is the tie breaker.
Sorry, CFoDemocrat. You lose.
-
It's clear one Saudi is telling the truth and one is not. The Russian is the tie breaker.
Sorry, CFoDemocrat. You lose.
haha! That's what he gets for blowing up my argument with his Jägerbombs example. You lose, CFoDumb.
-
Guise.... I prefer CFoModerate.
Thanks in advance.
-
http://www.wtsp.com/news/reporter/article/312878/79/Teen-girl-arrested-for-science-project-gone-bad
-
http://www.wtsp.com/news/reporter/article/312878/79/Teen-girl-arrested-for-science-project-gone-bad
Thank goodness for that school's zero tolerance policy. Everyone knows water bottle science experiments are the gateway drug to pipe bombs and eventually pressure cooker bombs.
-
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2317493/Saudi-official-Kingdom-warned-United-States-IN-WRITING-Boston-Bomber-Tamerlan-Tsarnaev-2012-rejected-application-entry-visa-visit-Mecca-2011.html#ixzz2S0nQMn00
Oh, hey look, another coverup by the administration. Tell Media Matters to send out the talking points, ASAP, and isolate the president.
What are you talking about?
Saudi embassy in Washington D.C. issues denial of account of a senior official who talked to MailOnline
Did I need to respond to this?
-
http://www.wtsp.com/news/reporter/article/312878/79/Teen-girl-arrested-for-science-project-gone-bad
-
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2317493/Saudi-official-Kingdom-warned-United-States-IN-WRITING-Boston-Bomber-Tamerlan-Tsarnaev-2012-rejected-application-entry-visa-visit-Mecca-2011.html#ixzz2S0nQMn00
Oh, hey look, another coverup by the administration. Tell Media Matters to send out the talking points, ASAP, and isolate the president.
What are you talking about?
Saudi embassy in Washington D.C. issues denial of account of a senior official who talked to MailOnline
Did I need to respond to this?
I know. It's so pathetic.
-
Lol, just turned on Colbert when he said that possessing a bomb is a federal offense
-
Lol, just turned on Colbert when he said that possessing a bomb is a federal offense
vindicated!
-
Lol, just turned on Colbert when he said that possessing a bomb is a federal offense
Unless it's a certain kind of bomb that is allowed?