Feel free to adress the merits chuckleheads.
The truth hurts, and now all the sudden obstruction is okay???
Crazy mindless hypocrisy
I can't believe you fell for this one. :libtards:
Interesting
Needless to say, there has never been an opposition tantrum like this in U.S. history. Yes, the South seceded from the Union with the election of President Lincoln (who also won with less than a majority of the popular vote), but in a sense secession was a more honest policy than keeping a legitimately elected government from functioning.
lololololol
Interesting
president’s program.
Needless to say, there has never been an opposition tantrum like this in U.S. history. Yes, the South seceded from the Union with the election of President Lincoln (who also won with less than a majority of the popular vote), but in a sense secession was a more honest policy than keeping a legitimately elected government from functioning. If the Democrats indeed continue this strategy, it will be nothing less than an attack on the legitimacy of the presidential election process, and a threat to the future of our democracy.
Still, the stakes are high for the Democrats. Wholesale obstruction is a risky strategy. Harry Reid’s obstructive efforts between 2010 and 2014, while it protected Senate Democrats from having to vote on popular conservative legislation, also deprived voters of any reasons to re-elect them. As a result, the Democrats lost Senate seats in 2010 and control of the Senate in 2014.
This one was really high-larious. Still going with the party of no? Trump can't even get a cabinet in place.
Interesting
president’s program.
Needless to say, there has never been an opposition tantrum like this in U.S. history. Yes, the South seceded from the Union with the election of President Lincoln (who also won with less than a majority of the popular vote), but in a sense secession was a more honest policy than keeping a legitimately elected government from functioning. If the Democrats indeed continue this strategy, it will be nothing less than an attack on the legitimacy of the presidential election process, and a threat to the future of our democracy.
Still, the stakes are high for the Democrats. Wholesale obstruction is a risky strategy. Harry Reid’s obstructive efforts between 2010 and 2014, while it protected Senate Democrats from having to vote on popular conservative legislation, also deprived voters of any reasons to re-elect them. As a result, the Democrats lost Senate seats in 2010 and control of the Senate in 2014.
Republicans are the party of "no" and literally wouldn't let the supreme court properly function for over a year. But yeah sure it's the democrats fault.
