Date: 21/08/25 - 10:26 AM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: Sutton  (Read 470 times)

March 22, 2008, 06:07:36 PM
Read 470 times

feralchat

  • Premium Member
  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 2160
Where was he the second half and why not give him a shot at covering Hughes and while pressing?

March 22, 2008, 06:09:30 PM
Reply #1

Pett

  • Premium Member
  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 8319
  • Personal Text
    Hey, basketball!!!
Because Frank Martin only likes playing him in the first half.

Get it, he's been here about half of the season....only play him for half of the game.

Very B&D of FM.

March 22, 2008, 06:12:53 PM
Reply #2

sys

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 10936
  • Personal Text
    gmafb
Where was he the second half and why not give him a shot at covering Hughes and while pressing?

it's hard to keep him in the game when teams sag off him like he's cmer.  couple that with how uw was keeping ksu off the boards, and it is easy to see why the coaches thought anderson was the better choice.  and at some point, they had to run brown out to see if someone could hit a 3.

i really don't see how they could have done anything else.
"these are no longer “games” in the commonly accepted sense of the term. these are free throw shooting contests leavened by the occasional sprint to the other end of the floor."

March 22, 2008, 06:14:57 PM
Reply #3

CatsNChiefs

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 2302
Where was he the second half and why not give him a shot at covering Hughes and while pressing?

it's hard to keep him in the game when teams sag off him like he's cmer.  couple that with how uw was keeping ksu off the boards, and it is easy to see why the coaches thought anderson was the better choice.  and at some point, they had to run brown out to see if someone could hit a 3.

i really don't see how they could have done anything else.

Very accurate IMO.  He's much more of a liability then I ever thought before.

March 22, 2008, 06:18:16 PM
Reply #4

doom

  • Muzzled Poster
  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 9952
Did you have the volume down while you watched?  With Sutton's lack of any offensive ability, especially from the perimeter, his guy just stuck inside closing down our lanes.  It was really hurting us.  That's why he went to three guards before half, and then tried to go bigger with Anderson.  We needed offense and he was the last person to give it.  I've been on the Sutton should play more bandwagon, but today I couldn't jump on.


I still want my cooler, bitches!

March 22, 2008, 06:18:44 PM
Reply #5

feralchat

  • Premium Member
  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 2160
His 3-point shooting percentage wasn't any worse than anybody else on the team. But really there was plenty of times to use him offense/defense in the second half, especially when we were putting on the press.

March 22, 2008, 06:22:58 PM
Reply #6

sys

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 10936
  • Personal Text
    gmafb
His 3-point shooting percentage wasn't any worse than anybody else on the team.

great (tragic) line.
"these are no longer “games” in the commonly accepted sense of the term. these are free throw shooting contests leavened by the occasional sprint to the other end of the floor."

March 22, 2008, 06:27:12 PM
Reply #7

cas

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6856
  • Personal Text
    Sniff Sniff. . . I smell Heisman.
Where was he the second half and why not give him a shot at covering Hughes and while pressing?

We were behind, we needed to come back, to come back we need to score points, to score points you need somebody that can shoot. So yeah...
csourk is the best pre-college poster on this board.  way better than oxlp956

March 22, 2008, 06:34:05 PM
Reply #8

feralchat

  • Premium Member
  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 2160
My thoughts is it starts on defense. We were pushing the ball the first half when we got some stops. For the first 10 minutes of the second half, Wisconsin's offense was basically have Hughes dribble until the shot clock was running down and then have him break down Blake or Pullen. If Sutton could have given us some stops so we could beat their defense down court, it would have been worth it.
And the press was totally ineffective.

March 22, 2008, 06:36:01 PM
Reply #9

cas

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6856
  • Personal Text
    Sniff Sniff. . . I smell Heisman.
My thoughts is it starts on defense. We were pushing the ball the first half when we got some stops. For the first 10 minutes of the second half, Wisconsin's offense was basically have Hughes dribble until the shot clock was running down and then have him break down Blake or Pullen. If Sutton could have given us some stops so we could beat their defense down court, it would have been worth it.
And the press was totally ineffective.

I really don't understand why we didn't have Sutton on Hughes.
csourk is the best pre-college poster on this board.  way better than oxlp956

March 22, 2008, 06:37:15 PM
Reply #10

jester66

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1585
Gilbert should have been in, but he does not make smart decisions on the offensive side.