From the Wichita Eagle and everyone's favorite sports writer...Jeffrey Martin!
]http://www.810whb.com/scripts/archives/getstory.asp?article=14964&string=noSearch]"He receives recruiting mail addressed to the Browns."
Addressed to the Browns. Key words. Sure, I don't see anything saying the Browns don't have any problem with that. They may not. That's really not my point. Your next question really leads me to that point however.
"Either way, how is sorting junk mail significantly different from AAU coaches receiving phone calls from college coaches?"Junk mail? All of this mail is recruiting related, it's not the Piggly Wiggly circular. So, who determines what the *junk* is? Butler, not Brown? Or, Brown not Butler? Sounds to me like Butler make the determination for mail which is not addressed to him. I believe it should be up to the recipient of the mail to determine what is junk, and what is not.
Rusty, I don't believe there is a significant difference than an AAU coach receiving a phone call (a junk phone call, as you term it apparently) and mail addressed to them. If they jump on the recruits phone and take the call...then I have a problem.
How much mail has been dismissed by Butler (even though it was addressed to the Browns) as junk?