Date: 18/08/25 - 11:01 AM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: Rank the Big XII after the 1st game  (Read 1188 times)

September 02, 2007, 02:30:53 AM
Read 1188 times

WildCatzPhreak

  • Guest
North
Nebraska
Kansas
Kansas State
Missouri
Colorado
Iowa State

South
Oklahoma
Texas A&M
Texas
Texas Tech
Oklahoma State
Baylor


Discuss.

September 02, 2007, 05:01:34 AM
Reply #1

Fausto

  • Classless Cat
  • Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 754
Tech hasn't played its first game.

September 02, 2007, 07:38:56 AM
Reply #2

catinthehat

  • Guest
ksu needs to be at the bottom with the other loser, isu

September 02, 2007, 08:08:19 AM
Reply #3

chuckleberry

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 125
  • Personal Text
    f*ck you bob huggins
NORTH

Nebraska
K-State
Kansas
Missouri
Colorado
Iowa State

SOUTH

OU
Texas
A&M
Tech
OSU
Baylor

September 02, 2007, 08:09:25 AM
Reply #4

eRod v1.0

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 141
North
Kansas State
Missouri
Nebraska
Colorado
Kansas
Iowa State

South
Oklahoma
Texas
Texas A&M
Oklahoma State
Texas Tech
Baylor

September 02, 2007, 08:24:20 AM
Reply #5

Legore

  • Premium Member
  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1686
North
Nebraska
Kansas
Kansas State
Missouri
Colorado
Iowa State

South
Oklahoma
Texas A&M
Texas
Texas Tech
Oklahoma State
Baylor


Discuss.

Too early to say anything.  Iowa State is clearly at the bottom and who knows on the rest.  With the exception of ISU the North did well this week. 

September 02, 2007, 08:40:59 AM
Reply #6

cas

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6856
  • Personal Text
    Sniff Sniff. . . I smell Heisman.
Standings at the end:

North

Nebraska
K-State
Missouri
Colorado
ku
ISU

(I think that MU, CU, and ku could all really be interchangeable)

South

Oklahoma
Texas
A&M
Okie State
Tech
Baylor
csourk is the best pre-college poster on this board.  way better than oxlp956

September 02, 2007, 08:53:18 AM
Reply #7

McGrowlTowelZac

  • Premium Member
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 4123
  • Personal Text
    This ZERO is my Hero
Standings at the end:

North

Nebraska
K-State
Missouri
Colorado
ku
ISU

(I think that MU, CU, and ku could all really be interchangeable)

South

Oklahoma
Texas
A&M
Okie State
Tech
Baylor

That looks about right.... for now.

September 02, 2007, 09:06:00 AM
Reply #8

KSUTOMMY

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 3578
  • Personal Text
    The "other" KSU
I think that KSU has an argument for 1st in the north along with NU. MU looked scared and CU looked almost beat. ku played my Hellen Keller's all-girl catholic high school for the blind, so I can't say whether or not they can do much... ISU needs help.

I feel like my life is normal again now that College Football is here! GO 'CATS  :ksu:

September 02, 2007, 10:04:58 AM
Reply #9

Houstoncat93

  • Classless Cat
  • Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 687
  • Personal Text
    It's good to be good again!
North

Group 1:  NU, KSU
Group 2: MU
Group 3: ku, CU
Group 7: ISU

South

Group 1: OU
Group 2: UT, ATM
Group 3: OSU
Group 4: BU
TBD: Tech

September 02, 2007, 10:19:08 AM
Reply #10

BMWJhawk

  • Guest
Central Michigan was 10-4 last year and won a bowl game.  That's not a cupcake.

ku dominated that game, 52-7.  You a-holes can doubt us all you want.  It's not going to change what happens when ku beats K-State in Manhattan.

Here's how the Big 12 rankings should look:

North:

NU
ku
MU
KSU
CU
ISU

South:

OU
A&M
UT
OSU
Tech
Baylor

September 02, 2007, 10:19:56 AM
Reply #11

S. Parker

  • Guest
I think it's too early to rank them. Nevada wasn't as good as last year, so we don't know very much about our team. Wake Forest will tell us a lot more.

What last night did tell me though is that you guys have a pretty good coach and we might be in for a tough game against you. I know you're probably crushed still this morning, but you should hold your heads high. You went into an incredibly tough atmosphere and outplayed a ranked team. I think that if Prince's recruits turn out he possibly could get you back to where you were with Snyder.

September 02, 2007, 10:20:27 AM
Reply #12

lynchmb1029

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 514
Central Michigan was 10-4 last year and won a bowl game.  That's not a cupcake.

ku dominated that game, 52-7.  You a-holes can doubt us all you want.  It's not going to change what happens when ku beats K-State in Manhattan.


 :loly:

How much money are you willing to lay down on that?

September 02, 2007, 10:52:09 AM
Reply #13

JTKSU

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 7178
  • Personal Text
    Gettin' angried up!!!
Central Michigan was 10-4 last year and won a bowl game.  That's not a cupcake.

ku dominated that game, 52-7.  You a-holes can doubt us all you want.  It's not going to change what happens when ku beats K-State in Manhattan.


 :loly:

How much money are you willing to lay down on that?

12-26-2006 Middle Tennessee State  Mid Major N 31 14 W
11-30-2006 Ohio  Mid Major N 31 10 W
11-24-2006 Buffalo  Mid Major A 55 28 W
11-17-2006 Northern Illinois  Mid Major A 10 31 L
11-10-2006 Western Michigan  Mid Major H 31 7 W
11-04-2006 Temple  Mid Major A 42 26 W
10-19-2006 Bowling Green  Mid Major H 31 14 W
10-14-2006 Ball State  Mid Major H 18 7 W
10-07-2006 Toledo  Mid Major A 42 20 W

09-30-2006 Kentucky  BCS A 36 45 L
09-23-2006 Eastern Michigan  Mid Major A 24 17 W
09-16-2006 Akron  Mid Major H 24 21 W
09-09-2006 Michigan (#9) BCS A 17 41 L
08-31-2006 Boston College (#20) BCS H 24 31 L


10-4 with losses to Kentucky and Northern Illionois.  Zero wins over BCS teams.  A bowl game win over Middle Tennessee State.  And you gave up 300 yards to them.  At home.  Yeah, you guys really played a tough team yesterday.

September 02, 2007, 10:58:31 AM
Reply #14

catinthehat

  • Guest
auburn will finish the season out of the top 25.  their offense is putrid and their defense is just average, maybe a bit better than average.




September 02, 2007, 11:04:35 AM
Reply #15

JTKSU

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 7178
  • Personal Text
    Gettin' angried up!!!
auburn will finish the season out of the top 25.  their offense is putrid and their defense is just average, maybe a bit better than average.




I love how, when they beat you, they are awesome.  But when we barely lose to them, they suck.  How's those sour grapes taste, douch bag?

September 02, 2007, 11:06:48 AM
Reply #16

mjrod

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 11246
    • MJROD Consulting Services, Inc
Central Michigan was 10-4 last year and won a bowl game.  That's not a cupcake.

Central Michigan also has a new coach and is running a different system than the previous year.  They have a good group but it was not dominating until the end of last year.    C. Michigan may be no better than Colorado was last year.

Try and keep up with your opponents.  It must suck that you don't even know what you're opponent's histories are much less your own team.

September 02, 2007, 11:22:52 AM
Reply #17

JR Ewing

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 577
North
Kansas State OR Mizzou
Kansas
Nebraska
Colorado
Iowa State

South
Oklahoma
Texas
Texas A&M
Texas Tech
Oklahoma State
Baylor
Once you get past the ethics, the rest is easy.

September 02, 2007, 11:29:25 AM
Reply #18

Snyderfanatic

  • Guest
Central Michigan was 10-4 last year and won a bowl game.  That's not a cupcake.

ku dominated that game, 52-7.  You a-holes can doubt us all you want.  It's not going to change what happens when ku beats K-State in Manhattan.

Here's how the Big 12 rankings should look:

North:

NU
ku
MU
KSU
CU
ISU

South:

OU
A&M
UT
OSU
Tech
Baylor

ku has a history of really playing well in Manhattan....
The touchdown scored in 1997 has me pretty nervous about the game....
For what it's worth, the Big 12 North based on the results of the first weekend did have some shuffling:
My North picks before the season:
1. MU
2. NU
3. KSU
4. ku
5. CU
6. ISU

After one game:
1. NU- Old style Huskers, great run game and crappy air game
2. KSU- Impressive at Auburn....Easily our best run defense we have had since the 2003 season....
3. MU- Same old Pinkel (2 point gamble almost lost the game) and MU defense barely held off Illini backup QB....
4. CU- Buffs are much improved and they have the chickens in Boulder (ku is awesome on the road)
5. ku- Impossible to judge against a total creampuff opponent....Should win 6 with both Baylor and ISU in weed town
6. ISU- Lose to Northern Iowa and 0-12 is reality
 

September 02, 2007, 11:42:44 AM
Reply #19

catinthehat

  • Guest
our air game is far from crappy.  We had a qb shaking off some rust and some jitters but when he did throw, except for the pick almost every pass was right where it needed to be.  We had 4 dropped passes that cost him well over 100 yards in receptions, one was a 65 yarder that fell right throug hthe wr's hands.  There is no qb problem at nebraska, he is very good and will get better with each game.  they key for nebraska is getting somne of the younger studs like meno holt and niles paul further ahead in the passing game to be wr targets and guys that drop balls will get knocked down the DC.

also.  Nu was without their top tight end and wr yesterday.  get those guys back and it makes a differance.

September 02, 2007, 11:44:42 AM
Reply #20

mjrod

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 11246
    • MJROD Consulting Services, Inc
our air game is far from crappy.  We had a qb shaking off some rust and some jitters but when he did throw, except for the pick almost every pass was right where it needed to be.  We had 4 dropped passes that cost him well over 100 yards in receptions, one was a 65 yarder that fell right throug hthe wr's hands.  There is no qb problem at nebraska, he is very good and will get better with each game.  they key for nebraska is getting somne of the younger studs like meno holt and niles paul further ahead in the passing game to be wr targets and guys that drop balls will get knocked down the DC.

also.  Nu was without their top tight end and wr yesterday.  get those guys back and it makes a differance.

No excuses corn.  He looked like crap and you and everyone else know that Callahan reigned him in because he isn't getting it yet.   The season he may improve and get better, but he better get that way quick or it's going to be a long season.

September 02, 2007, 11:46:54 AM
Reply #21

WildCatzPhreak

  • Guest
Yeah, at the one point I was listening to the NU game I heard "hand off to lucky, hand off to lucky, hand off to rb#2, hand off to lucky, hand off to rb#2, hand off to lucky, Keller..With all day to throw, wow look at that O-line!...Incomplete, hand off to lucky"

At least you guys seem to have a pretty good O-line and run game.

September 02, 2007, 11:52:45 AM
Reply #22

waks

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 10290
  • Personal Text
    KSU Super Fan
Honestly, I thought Keller looked pretty good. Save the intercepted pass (which was an absolutely horrible decision, mind you) but he had a pretty good day. I stopped watching it when NU took the lead, so maybe I didn't see the rest of it. He did have tons of time to throw, so I don't know to credit that to NU's o-line or to Nevada's pass rush. Either way, I'm much more excited to see this game than I was before we played Auburn last night.

September 02, 2007, 11:54:36 AM
Reply #23

ksuno1stunner

  • Guest
THE ORDER IS RESTORED

1) KSU/NU/CU
4) MU
5) ku/ISU

EMAW!

 :ksu: :ksu: :ksu:

September 02, 2007, 12:00:42 PM
Reply #24

mjrod

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 11246
    • MJROD Consulting Services, Inc
Honestly, I thought Keller looked pretty good. Save the intercepted pass (which was an absolutely horrible decision, mind you) but he had a pretty good day. I stopped watching it when NU took the lead, so maybe I didn't see the rest of it. He did have tons of time to throw, so I don't know to credit that to NU's o-line or to Nevada's pass rush. Either way, I'm much more excited to see this game than I was before we played Auburn last night.

Keller looked good when he threw on strike.   The kid has talent, no one is denying that.  The problem with Keller is that Callahan's system is very complex.  You really have to be in that system for a couple of years to really be effective and I think that's a hindrance when you're talking about the having a player with the skills as Keller to effectively grasp it.  Callahan is banking on Keller's sheer talent to overcome his ability to grasp the offense.  No doubt, Keller would flourish in a less complex system you can get comfortable with, but you need a QB with a lot of "memory capacity" to get a good feel.  Zac Taylor did well in that system, but it took time.  You have to play it though to get it.

September 02, 2007, 12:04:36 PM
Reply #25

waks

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 10290
  • Personal Text
    KSU Super Fan
Honestly, I thought Keller looked pretty good. Save the intercepted pass (which was an absolutely horrible decision, mind you) but he had a pretty good day. I stopped watching it when NU took the lead, so maybe I didn't see the rest of it. He did have tons of time to throw, so I don't know to credit that to NU's o-line or to Nevada's pass rush. Either way, I'm much more excited to see this game than I was before we played Auburn last night.

Keller looked good when he threw on strike.   The kid has talent, no one is denying that.  The problem with Keller is that Callahan's system is very complex.  You really have to be in that system for a couple of years to really be effective and I think that's a hindrance when you're talking about the having a player with the skills as Keller to effectively grasp it.  Callahan is banking on Keller's sheer talent to overcome his ability to grasp the offense.  No doubt, Keller would flourish in a less complex system you can get comfortable with, but you need a QB with a lot of "memory capacity" to get a good feel.  Zac Taylor did well in that system, but it took time.  You have to play it though to get it.
I did notice a lot of delay of game penalties but Keller didn't show me anything that Husker fans should get worried about, jmo..

September 02, 2007, 12:08:31 PM
Reply #26

Maxell

  • Guest
He'll only get better the more he plays. There's no question that with Maurice Purify and Teafatiller back, everything will work that much better. Us playing without Purify is like Texas without Sweed; OSU without Bowman; Oklahoma without Kelly etc.

September 02, 2007, 12:12:19 PM
Reply #27

mjrod

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 11246
    • MJROD Consulting Services, Inc
He'll only get better the more he plays. There's no question that with Maurice Purify and Teafatiller back, everything will work that much better. Us playing without Purify is like Texas without Sweed; OSU without Bowman; Oklahoma without Kelly etc.

Even with Sweed and Bowman, KSU managed to beat them.   That's a pretty lousy argument.

I think the thing to remember, honestly, is that Keller has a lot to master.  Again, I will say, that NU is a good team, but you looked exactly like you did against La Tech last year.   Played poorly first half, blew it out in the second half.   And stop using the excuses of Purify, Teafatiller, etc.    If Keller is that good of QB, then it wouldn't matter what WR are out there.


September 02, 2007, 12:29:46 PM
Reply #28

Maxell

  • Guest
The hell it doesn't matter. Purify can make catches that no other WR on our team can. You can't cover him 1-1 unless you have a Reggie Smith type player. It opens up the entire offense.

This year's team is nothing like last year's team against La Tech. 624 yards were the most put up in the entire Callahan era. We took a knee to end the game mercifully after playing our entire 2nd team the whole 4th quarter.

September 02, 2007, 12:31:09 PM
Reply #29

ksuno1stunner

  • Guest
The hell it doesn't matter. Purify can make catches that no other WR on our team can. You can't cover him 1-1 unless you have a Reggie Smith type player. It opens up the entire offense.

This year's team is nothing like last year's team against La Tech. 624 yards were the most put up in the entire Callahan era. We took a knee to end the game mercifully after playing our entire 2nd team the whole 4th quarter.

THE ORDER IS RESTORED

1) KSU/NU/CU
4) MU
5) ku/ISU

EMAW!

 :ksu: :ksu: :ksu:

THE ORDER...RESTORED!!!