Then wtf is your point? Who the f said that a coach should go around and explain why he did or didn't choose a recruit? Are you just making points up so you can retort? If there's more to the story, then let me have it....what, exactly, is there? When and where did you talk to Prince or Butler to get more of the scoop? Otherwise, you have no point, you're just pissed about what Butler said and can't deal with it.
Waks said Prince should explain why he didn't offer a KS HS kid. It's back one page. It is quite simply the dumbest comment in this thread. If you had read the exchanges on this board, you would know this by now.
I'm not pissed about what Butler said at all. I'm entertained by the tards on this board going stircrazy every time someone says something questioning the sacred cows (that's Butler and JMart).
Personally I think Butler is just using hyperbole to draw attention to himself and his efforts. Happens all the time and isn't a big deal at all. Prince's comments about JMart are even less of a deal. His comments about Butler also aren't going to have a real impact.
And I'm the one pointing out that there is quite likely a ton of unknowns to all the folks that have entered suicide watch after Prince jabbed a Wichita handler at a Catbacker event.
Here's a question for Scuba and KSU4ME:
If Butler is irrelevant, why have you two combined for over thirty posts in a thread about a journalist not asking Butler the right questions?
I'm not posting about Butler/JMart as much as I am the tards on this board going ballistic whenever those two are questioned. It's prime entertainment.
Have you figured out why you're so worked up over the issue given that you don't even know what impact Prince's words have had on Butler (your own admission)?
BTW, this is some high-quality ass kissing:
“Pete Carroll said he’s the best linebacker that he’s seen in seven years,” Butler said. “Bob Stoops said he’s going to win the Butkus Award two times.”
And the butt that got kissed was Brown's.....not Butlers.
I missed your responses to the above, KSU4ME.
3. Do you attack anyone who dares question something a Wichita Reporter or Wichita "handler" does? <-- The criteria that puts Rusty, Waks and yourself firmly in the tard bucket. Like I said, your behavior is exactly the same as a Powertard, it's just a different subject that sets you off. Tard is as tard does, and you're all over it.
Here's your answers:
A piece on a particular person's thoughts on a particular issue is not the same as a piece on that issue in general.
You questioned if it was an article about "the recruitment of Kansas grads by Kansas universities" and that's exactly what it was.
The value of regurgitating other's words without any analysis or additional relevant facts. (Yes, that is a serious response.)
Well, that's stupid, and isn't what Martin does. Even in the Butler article he included quite a few relevant facts that didn't come from quotes. I can't believe you actually posted that.
link?
http://www.kansas.com/248/story/95031.html Lots of sources, all sorts of peripheral facts, great article.
Can you give some examples of other notebooks that were followed up on or included additional relevant facts/analysis? Or else tell me why this one should be treated differently.
Never said a previous one did, as for a reason why there should be more on this story, I would say that the recruitment of Brown is something of major interest to KSU fans, and Martin is the KSU beat writer for Brown's hometown. If Martin wrote another story on the subject, don't you think it would be widely read and extensively commented on here?
Have you read this message board and J-Marts blog? It's a subject with quite a bit of interest.
