Author Topic: The Royals  (Read 4751195 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline joda

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3759
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5450 on: July 31, 2013, 05:11:40 PM »
We basically just re-acquired Frenchy

Someone follows Rany on twitter!  :peek:

Yea but I was thinking it before I even saw his post. This is why the Royals will never win the WS (or come close) with the current brain trust. If the value of Frenchy was so little that you basically pay him to go away, why go out a give up a decent prospect for a similar player? This move reeks of "we wanted to do something bigger but nothing worked out so we did something to make it look like we did something".


Even if Cain is going to be out for awhile, if they weren't going to get a 2B then stay pat, be creative (I bet Kottaras could play OF in a pinch, and Hoz and Elliot both have at least a minimal amout of OF experiance). Then keep Smith and use him to shop this winter when they have a better idea of whether Duffy and Paulino can make it all they way back, whether Santana is sticking around, and if Ventura and Zimmer are ML ready or to still improve that gaping black hole at 2B.


Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40554
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5451 on: July 31, 2013, 06:48:32 PM »
lol @ the royals.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40554
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5452 on: July 31, 2013, 07:15:43 PM »
getz may be hurt a little bit!   :ksu:
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5453 on: July 31, 2013, 08:19:07 PM »
He's not bad.  A little better than Lough.  Didn't give up much to get him.

Will take.

You're kidding right?

Lough is hitting right around. 300 and plays a great RF. I can only assume this is a joke.

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5454 on: July 31, 2013, 09:41:51 PM »
Indians win in a walk off in the 10th  :curse:

Offline raquetcat

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Katpak'r
  • *******
  • Posts: 1957
  • ^ I let us down
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5455 on: July 31, 2013, 09:51:22 PM »
I'm purple down

Offline PowercatPat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4427
  • #BID
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5456 on: July 31, 2013, 10:02:07 PM »
I hate Herrera.

Offline kstate16

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 394
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5457 on: July 31, 2013, 10:03:42 PM »
I hate Herrera.
I was literally about to post this. He is so  :chainsaw:

Offline EMAWmeister

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 8957
  • Livin' it up
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5458 on: July 31, 2013, 10:20:10 PM »
K'AAAAAAAAAW

[attachment deleted by admin]

Offline Jackstack99EMAW

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1355
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5459 on: July 31, 2013, 10:32:35 PM »
Greg Holland:  confirmed stud

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5460 on: July 31, 2013, 10:46:25 PM »
at least we gained a half game in the WC race

Offline Jackstack99EMAW

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1355
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5461 on: July 31, 2013, 11:08:21 PM »
at least we gained a half game in the WC race
Yay?

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19837
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5462 on: July 31, 2013, 11:13:56 PM »
we've got a ton of games with the indians and tigers in the last 4 weeks, control our destiny etc

Offline bones129

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12132
  • RUN! Tell all the other curs the Law's coming!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5463 on: July 31, 2013, 11:21:22 PM »
we've got a ton of games with the indians and tigers in the last 4 weeks, control our destiny etc

It would be nice if the Tigers and Tribe weren't as hot as we are right now, so we could be gaining significant ground...but Cire's point is excellent. Lots of head-to-head games with those guys yet to be played.

Offline PowercatPat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4427
  • #BID
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5464 on: July 31, 2013, 11:30:41 PM »
we've got a ton of games with the indians and tigers in the last 4 weeks, control our destiny etc

It would be nice if the Tigers and Tribe weren't as hot as we are right now, so we could be gaining significant ground...but Cire's point is excellent. Lots of head-to-head games with those guys yet to be played.

Ya, the Royals, Indians, and Tigers combined are on a 20 game winning streak. It's really unfortunate that the teams the Royals are chasing are as hot as them.

Offline Super PurpleCat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3555
  • purple hugs are back! get yours today
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5465 on: August 01, 2013, 12:15:36 AM »
Guys, we could be on a 8 game losing streak, jfc.

Offline The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9740
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5466 on: August 01, 2013, 08:26:00 AM »
Guys, we could be on a 8 game losing streak, jfc.

yeah, this. at least were keeping ourselves within reach. if we had gone 4-4 in this stretch, it would be all but over.
I think what my friend Mitch is trying to say is that true love is blind.

Offline SabiNation

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2089
  • USA Handball - Rio 2016
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5467 on: August 01, 2013, 08:29:31 AM »
I DON'T MIND THE TRADE
"If i worked for the NY times, and my boss told me 'hey. if you keep ranking ksu so high, we may fire you' i would tell my boss to 'bring it on.'"  -FFF

Offline Belvis Noland

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3964
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5468 on: August 01, 2013, 08:54:26 AM »
11 against the Tigers.  6 against the Indians.  Our Time. 

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51671
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5469 on: August 01, 2013, 09:08:43 AM »
11 against the Tigers.  6 against the Indians.  Our Time.

They will both Farm Hump us. 

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39235
    • View Profile
Re: Re: The Royals
« Reply #5470 on: August 01, 2013, 09:15:42 AM »
11 against the Tigers.  6 against the Indians.  Our Time.

They will both Farm Hump us.

We've already beaten Verlander twice this year. He's the only pitcher Billy can hit this year (lulz). But yeah Cleveland will steam roll the roygals

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39235
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5471 on: August 01, 2013, 09:16:45 AM »
My Italian friend from Chicago calls the royals the roygals in a derogatory fashion

Offline Belvis Noland

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3964
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5472 on: August 01, 2013, 09:19:05 AM »
11 against the Tigers.  6 against the Indians.  Our Time.

They will both Farm Hump us.

likely, yes.

Offline _33

  • The Inventor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10155
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5473 on: August 01, 2013, 09:22:19 AM »
My Italian friend from Chicago calls the royals the roygals in a derogatory fashion

You should call them the boyals, as like a comeback to him.

Offline The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9740
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5474 on: August 01, 2013, 09:29:20 AM »
limestone, shutup. were trying to have fun here. sheesh.
I think what my friend Mitch is trying to say is that true love is blind.