Author Topic: The Royals  (Read 5781599 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27689
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5100 on: July 09, 2013, 04:57:50 PM »
Hudler is a complete moron

'nuff said. Beat it Rex.

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5101 on: July 09, 2013, 04:59:15 PM »


ryan knows it's coming lol, must have said the same thing on break or something.

LOL, the super quick "No." from RL is classic.

Hudler is a complete moron, but all he was trying to say was, "Imagine how popular Salvy would be if he played in a big market,"...which is a very true point, he just made the point in the worst way possible.

Oh, and since we've digressed to posting 'optimal lineups' I'd go with

Gordon - L
Johnny G - R
Butler - R
Hosmer - L
Perez - R
Moose - L
Cain - R
Lough -L
Escobar - R

I personally don't put a lot of stock into the LRLRLR batting order, but I know Ned does, so I think this is a lineup that he could settle into eventually assuming Escobar stays <.250/.300

Escobar (much like everyone else) would probably benefit from a bit of routine and staying in one role offensively.  And LRL is great in theory but it's a luxury few teams have.

Offline jmlynch1

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2781
  • stay together for the kids
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5102 on: July 09, 2013, 05:00:14 PM »
Don't be a too cool for school jerk. Hudler is a buffoon and needs to hit the road JACK!
highest ratings in like ever

Offline EMAWesome

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1113
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5103 on: July 09, 2013, 05:03:28 PM »


ryan knows it's coming lol, must have said the same thing on break or something.

LOL, the super quick "No." from RL is classic.

Hudler is a complete moron, but all he was trying to say was, "Imagine how popular Salvy would be if he played in a big market,"...which is a very true point, he just made the point in the worst way possible.

Oh, and since we've digressed to posting 'optimal lineups' I'd go with

Gordon - L
Johnny G - R
Butler - R
Hosmer - L
Perez - R
Moose - L
Cain - R
Lough -L
Escobar - R

I personally don't put a lot of stock into the LRLRLR batting order, but I know Ned does, so I think this is a lineup that he could settle into eventually assuming Escobar stays <.250/.300

Escobar (much like everyone else) would probably benefit from a bit of routine and staying in one role offensively.  And LRL is great in theory but it's a luxury few teams have.

LRLRLR is completely secondary in building a succesful lineup...Ned's problem is it seems to be his first priority.

And on good teams, everybody does have a single role offensively...get on base as often as possible, regardless of spot in the order. THAT needs to be KC's philosophy...players do not change their approach whether they are hitting in the 1 or 6 spot in the order, and to perpetuate that myth is asinine

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5104 on: July 09, 2013, 05:08:21 PM »


ryan knows it's coming lol, must have said the same thing on break or something.

LOL, the super quick "No." from RL is classic.

Hudler is a complete moron, but all he was trying to say was, "Imagine how popular Salvy would be if he played in a big market,"...which is a very true point, he just made the point in the worst way possible.

Oh, and since we've digressed to posting 'optimal lineups' I'd go with

Gordon - L
Johnny G - R
Butler - R
Hosmer - L
Perez - R
Moose - L
Cain - R
Lough -L
Escobar - R

I personally don't put a lot of stock into the LRLRLR batting order, but I know Ned does, so I think this is a lineup that he could settle into eventually assuming Escobar stays <.250/.300

Escobar (much like everyone else) would probably benefit from a bit of routine and staying in one role offensively.  And LRL is great in theory but it's a luxury few teams have.

LRLRLR is completely secondary in building a succesful lineup...Ned's problem is it seems to be his first priority.

And on good teams, everybody does have a single role offensively...get on base as often as possible, regardless of spot in the order. THAT needs to be KC's philosophy...players do not change their approach whether they are hitting in the 1 or 6 spot in the order, and to perpetuate that myth is asinine

Incorrect. You really think the stud power hitters in the game are more concerned with getting on base or driving in runs?  The batting order matters because certain people have skillsets that lend them to a spot in the order. I mean, I guess it's everybody's goal to simply hit the ball and get on base but this ain't little league so dudes do have different roles.

Offline Jackstack99EMAW

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1355
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5105 on: July 09, 2013, 05:12:54 PM »
Also, Escobar cannot be in the two hole any longer.  Order should either be Dyson Gordo Butler Hos Salvy or Gordo Butler Hos/Salvy(Either one, interchangeable.

Yost has a hard-on for esky in the 2 hole for some reason. When they moved him down where he needed to be for awhile it worked well but now he's back.

And in no way should dyson be the regular lead off man. He's no better at the top of the order than esky. If moose continues hitting decent the top 5 in the order should be Gordon, Butler, Hoz, Moose, and Salvy in any order.
Moose should not be in the top 5, he's still not great and is like 4 for 61 with RISP.

Offline EMAWesome

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1113
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5106 on: July 09, 2013, 05:14:23 PM »


ryan knows it's coming lol, must have said the same thing on break or something.

LOL, the super quick "No." from RL is classic.

Hudler is a complete moron, but all he was trying to say was, "Imagine how popular Salvy would be if he played in a big market,"...which is a very true point, he just made the point in the worst way possible.

Oh, and since we've digressed to posting 'optimal lineups' I'd go with

Gordon - L
Johnny G - R
Butler - R
Hosmer - L
Perez - R
Moose - L
Cain - R
Lough -L
Escobar - R

I personally don't put a lot of stock into the LRLRLR batting order, but I know Ned does, so I think this is a lineup that he could settle into eventually assuming Escobar stays <.250/.300

Escobar (much like everyone else) would probably benefit from a bit of routine and staying in one role offensively.  And LRL is great in theory but it's a luxury few teams have.

LRLRLR is completely secondary in building a succesful lineup...Ned's problem is it seems to be his first priority.

And on good teams, everybody does have a single role offensively...get on base as often as possible, regardless of spot in the order. THAT needs to be KC's philosophy...players do not change their approach whether they are hitting in the 1 or 6 spot in the order, and to perpetuate that myth is asinine

Incorrect. You really think the stud power hitters in the game are more concerned with getting on base or driving in runs?  The batting order matters because certain people have skillsets that lend them to a spot in the order. I mean, I guess it's everybody's goal to simply hit the ball and get on base but this ain't little league so dudes do have different roles.

So, you think that if Jose Bautista is batting leadoff, he will change his approach? You think if Jarrod Dyson bats cleanup, he's going to start swinging for the fences? Cmon man. Players are slotted into lineups to suit their skillset, yes, but the approach of a player is dictated by his skillset, not his place in the lineup

Offline Jackstack99EMAW

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1355
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5107 on: July 09, 2013, 05:15:08 PM »


ryan knows it's coming lol, must have said the same thing on break or something.

LOL, the super quick "No." from RL is classic.

Hudler is a complete moron, but all he was trying to say was, "Imagine how popular Salvy would be if he played in a big market,"...which is a very true point, he just made the point in the worst way possible.

Oh, and since we've digressed to posting 'optimal lineups' I'd go with

Gordon - L
Johnny G - R
Butler - R
Hosmer - L
Perez - R
Moose - L
Cain - R
Lough -L
Escobar - R

I personally don't put a lot of stock into the LRLRLR batting order, but I know Ned does, so I think this is a lineup that he could settle into eventually assuming Escobar stays <.250/.300
Johnny should not be 2...

Offline Jackstack99EMAW

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1355
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5108 on: July 09, 2013, 05:17:48 PM »
I don't really see how putting Butler at 2 is so crazy, he's not fast, but he gets on base a lot, which Esky doesn't do, and Hos should be in the 3 or 4 to have runners on and drive them in.  Billy could be at 3 or 4 too but 2 hole needs to change.

Offline EMAWesome

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1113
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5109 on: July 09, 2013, 05:18:47 PM »


ryan knows it's coming lol, must have said the same thing on break or something.

LOL, the super quick "No." from RL is classic.

Hudler is a complete moron, but all he was trying to say was, "Imagine how popular Salvy would be if he played in a big market,"...which is a very true point, he just made the point in the worst way possible.

Oh, and since we've digressed to posting 'optimal lineups' I'd go with

Gordon - L
Johnny G - R
Butler - R
Hosmer - L
Perez - R
Moose - L
Cain - R
Lough -L
Escobar - R

I personally don't put a lot of stock into the LRLRLR batting order, but I know Ned does, so I think this is a lineup that he could settle into eventually assuming Escobar stays <.250/.300
Johnny should not be 2...

Prototypical #2 for a manager like Ned if/when he grows into the role...shows good bat control, got on base @ a .380 clip in the minors...agree, it is a stretch at current, but I'd take him there over Escobar right now

Offline EMAWesome

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1113
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5110 on: July 09, 2013, 05:19:49 PM »
I don't really see how putting Butler at 2 is so crazy, he's not fast, but he gets on base a lot, which Esky doesn't do, and Hos should be in the 3 or 4 to have runners on and drive them in.  Billy could be at 3 or 4 too but 2 hole needs to change.

It isn't crazy at all...it's just not going to happen for an org like KC that still views statistical analysis like witchcraft

Offline Jackstack99EMAW

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1355
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5111 on: July 09, 2013, 05:38:52 PM »


ryan knows it's coming lol, must have said the same thing on break or something.

LOL, the super quick "No." from RL is classic.

Hudler is a complete moron, but all he was trying to say was, "Imagine how popular Salvy would be if he played in a big market,"...which is a very true point, he just made the point in the worst way possible.

Oh, and since we've digressed to posting 'optimal lineups' I'd go with

Gordon - L
Johnny G - R
Butler - R
Hosmer - L
Perez - R
Moose - L
Cain - R
Lough -L
Escobar - R

I personally don't put a lot of stock into the LRLRLR batting order, but I know Ned does, so I think this is a lineup that he could settle into eventually assuming Escobar stays <.250/.300
Johnny should not be 2...

Prototypical #2 for a manager like Ned if/when he grows into the role...shows good bat control, got on base @ a .380 clip in the minors...agree, it is a stretch at current, but I'd take him there over Escobar right now
He needs to show some consistency before he gets there imo. 

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20631
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5112 on: July 09, 2013, 06:46:41 PM »
Hud is great.  Royals fans gonna royal

Offline PowercatPat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4427
  • #BID
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5113 on: July 09, 2013, 07:51:23 PM »


ryan knows it's coming lol, must have said the same thing on break or something.

LOL, the super quick "No." from RL is classic.

Hudler is a complete moron, but all he was trying to say was, "Imagine how popular Salvy would be if he played in a big market,"...which is a very true point, he just made the point in the worst way possible.

Oh, and since we've digressed to posting 'optimal lineups' I'd go with

Gordon - L
Johnny G - R
Butler - R
Hosmer - L
Perez - R
Moose - L
Cain - R
Lough -L
Escobar - R

I personally don't put a lot of stock into the LRLRLR batting order, but I know Ned does, so I think this is a lineup that he could settle into eventually assuming Escobar stays <.250/.300
Johnny should not be 2...

Thoughts on Lough in the 2 hole? I think he should get a shot.

Offline EMAWesome

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1113
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5114 on: July 09, 2013, 07:54:13 PM »


ryan knows it's coming lol, must have said the same thing on break or something.

LOL, the super quick "No." from RL is classic.

Hudler is a complete moron, but all he was trying to say was, "Imagine how popular Salvy would be if he played in a big market,"...which is a very true point, he just made the point in the worst way possible.

Oh, and since we've digressed to posting 'optimal lineups' I'd go with

Gordon - L
Johnny G - R
Butler - R
Hosmer - L
Perez - R
Moose - L
Cain - R
Lough -L
Escobar - R

I personally don't put a lot of stock into the LRLRLR batting order, but I know Ned does, so I think this is a lineup that he could settle into eventually assuming Escobar stays <.250/.300
Johnny should not be 2...

Thoughts on Lough in the 2 hole? I think he should get a shot.

He fits in nice there, I agree...was just keeping w/ Neds LRLRLR addiction

Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19406
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5115 on: July 09, 2013, 08:41:51 PM »
Go Royals.
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5116 on: July 09, 2013, 08:44:09 PM »
 :emawkid:

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27689
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5117 on: July 09, 2013, 08:59:50 PM »
Don't look now haters, but the KC Royals are HOT!

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32516
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5118 on: July 09, 2013, 09:01:43 PM »
I  enjoyed that big country breakfast for dinner
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27689
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5119 on: July 09, 2013, 09:05:45 PM »
I  enjoyed that big country breakfast for dinner

With BBQ Sauce for dippin'

Offline fun muffin

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1594
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5120 on: July 09, 2013, 09:06:18 PM »
Don't look now haters, but the KC Royals are HOT!


3 out of 4!!!!!

Offline AndrewVonLintel

  • Purple Prince Thrice Crowned in MMXIII
  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 475
  • Purple Get Ready To Roll!!!!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5121 on: July 09, 2013, 09:13:51 PM »
1 game under   .500.     :horrorsurprise:

Getting Big Game James a W.     :D

Only two holes in the batting order instead of 5     :thumbs:

Get me another .280 hitter at 2nd with some pop and we would be ready to cruise.   :driving: 

Or move Gordon to 3rd and Play Cain, Lough and Dyson all the time.    :crossfingers:

Hire Brad Underwood Now!!!!!!

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20631
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5122 on: July 09, 2013, 09:14:43 PM »
lookin good bros

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27689
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5123 on: July 09, 2013, 09:18:21 PM »
These kids are winners. If you root for them that makes you a winner. If you root against them you are a loser and live in a garbage dump. 

Offline bones129

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12132
  • RUN! Tell all the other curs the Law's coming!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #5124 on: July 09, 2013, 09:18:51 PM »