Author Topic: The Royals  (Read 5871312 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: The Royals
« Reply #68950 on: April 19, 2017, 10:10:23 PM »
Maybe we should put Cuthbert on 1st.

Next year.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline EMAWmeister

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 8957
  • Livin' it up
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #68951 on: April 19, 2017, 11:17:39 PM »
Maybe we should put Cuthbert on 1st.

I would sign moose and experiment with this  :surprised:

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32549
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #68952 on: April 19, 2017, 11:26:59 PM »
This Hosmer hate feels very similar to the Kendrys hate to start 2016.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #68953 on: April 20, 2017, 08:16:42 AM »

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #68954 on: April 20, 2017, 08:22:38 AM »
I hope bad things happen to that man

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27692
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #68956 on: April 20, 2017, 08:37:36 AM »

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27692
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #68957 on: April 20, 2017, 08:38:20 AM »
WC bud I wasn't implying it was you.


Just someone exactly like you.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27692
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #68958 on: April 20, 2017, 08:38:52 AM »
jk, jk. but seriously of all the Royals shirts to wear........

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #68959 on: April 20, 2017, 08:40:21 AM »
Yeah, literal t-shirt fan. Probably went to one game last year and lucked into that handout in the 2nd half of the season.

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #68960 on: April 20, 2017, 08:47:18 AM »
So charges will be filed right?

Offline WildcatNkilt

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7002
  • Had the worst birthday ever on Dec. 5th of '98.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #68961 on: April 20, 2017, 08:50:10 AM »
I bet they are Chiefs season ticket holders.   :sdeek:
Kansas City Blue Barbecue fan.

Offline hatingfrancisco

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4518
    • View Profile
    • Tweet Tweet
Re: The Royals
« Reply #68962 on: April 20, 2017, 08:52:28 AM »
Witnesses said the woman was the initial aggressor but tough guy waited till she looked away to give her the haymaker. 


Offline Gooch

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9491
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #68963 on: April 20, 2017, 09:04:33 AM »
"And the home of the CHIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEFFFFFFFFFSSSSSSSSSSSS!"

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #68964 on: April 20, 2017, 09:05:53 AM »
I bet they are Chiefs season ticket holders.   :sdeek:
Most likely. Yuck.

Online cfbandyman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11116
  • To da 'ville.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #68965 on: April 20, 2017, 09:19:56 AM »
I bet they are Chiefs season ticket holders.   :sdeek:
Most likely. Yuck.

The O/U on that guy being from Independence is increds
A&M Style: 1/19/13 Co-Champion of THE ED's College Basketball Challenge

The art of the deal with it poors

OG Elon hater


Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #68966 on: April 20, 2017, 12:03:33 PM »
I bet they are Chiefs season ticket holders.   :sdeek:
Most likely. Yuck.

The O/U on that guy being from Independence is increds

How does one Over/Under a city?
:adios:

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #68967 on: April 20, 2017, 12:41:07 PM »
I'm a stats nerd, but not a baseball stats nerd. If you had one "go to" stat to evaluate a baseball player what would it be? OPS for batting and WHIP for pitching?

FWIW, I know that in theory it is math/numbers based, but I don't like WAR. It just seems to arbitrary to me.

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #68968 on: April 20, 2017, 12:41:21 PM »
I bet they are Chiefs season ticket holders.   :sdeek:
Most likely. Yuck.

The O/U on that guy being from Independence is increds

How does one Over/Under a city?

it doesn't work, and the amount of people who use O/U instead of "odds" or "percent chance" is absolutely insane.

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #68969 on: April 20, 2017, 02:21:50 PM »
I'm a stats nerd, but not a baseball stats nerd. If you had one "go to" stat to evaluate a baseball player what would it be? OPS for batting and WHIP for pitching?

FWIW, I know that in theory it is math/numbers based, but I don't like WAR. It just seems to arbitrary to me.

Between the 2, I put more stock into OPS for a hitter rather than Whip for a pitcher.   Great starting pitchers will usually have very good ERA & WHIP. However Syndergard had a 2.60  ERA (4th best in MLB) and a 1.15 Whip. There were a couple of pitchers who had a Whip not much higher (1.22-1.26) but ERA in the 4.2-4.6 range.  As a pitcher, you can give up hits but if you're Slug allowed is low and you are good at getting out of jams....You're ERA can still be very good.

Combining the OnBase & Slug to get the OPS is combining the 2 most important offensive stats IMO. A player who can get on base and then produce a high number of total bases by hitting XBase hits....That player is very valuable to his team

** Kennedy last year in starts 1-10 & 21-33 combined had a 2.82 ERA.  Starts 11-20 was 5.89 and his Whip was only 0.10 higher. His Slug allowed was awful giving up lots of HRs.

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #68970 on: April 20, 2017, 02:27:37 PM »
I'm a stats nerd, but not a baseball stats nerd. If you had one "go to" stat to evaluate a baseball player what would it be? OPS for batting and WHIP for pitching?

FWIW, I know that in theory it is math/numbers based, but I don't like WAR. It just seems to arbitrary to me.

I would suggest Weighted Runs Created (wRC+) for hitters and Fielding Independent Pitching (FIP) for pitchers.  Both scaled to be intuitive, wRC+ with 100 = average, and FIP set to ERA scale.

Primers:
http://www.fangraphs.com/library/offense/wrc/
http://www.fangraphs.com/library/pitching/fip/
:adios:

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #68971 on: April 20, 2017, 07:53:31 PM »
Good grief Mondesi. I strongly dislike him and his hair

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32549
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #68972 on: April 20, 2017, 08:36:49 PM »
Ryan is being nicer to Rex tonight.  Good job PI'ng him everyone.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #68973 on: April 20, 2017, 09:18:32 PM »
So our 8th and 9th hitters tonight have now combined for 14 total bases and 29 SO.

I have no idea what Soler will bring but having him and Whit in lineup most every day just can't here soon enough

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #68974 on: April 20, 2017, 09:52:17 PM »
Good job Mondo. Seriously.