0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: mocat on October 28, 2015, 10:42:45 AMQuote from: WackyCat08 on October 28, 2015, 10:42:00 AMWhy would you ever trust a lawyers word?what does this mean wacky mocat?
Quote from: WackyCat08 on October 28, 2015, 10:42:00 AMWhy would you ever trust a lawyers word?what does this mean wacky mocat?
Why would you ever trust a lawyers word?
Quote from: WackyCat08 on October 30, 2015, 08:40:50 AMQuote from: mocat on October 28, 2015, 10:42:45 AMQuote from: WackyCat08 on October 28, 2015, 10:42:00 AMWhy would you ever trust a lawyers word?what does this mean wacky mocat? that is a photo of nic cage on a date with the titular (lol) figure from Valley Girl (1983 romantic comedy)
Quote from: mocat on October 30, 2015, 09:06:39 AMQuote from: WackyCat08 on October 30, 2015, 08:40:50 AMQuote from: mocat on October 28, 2015, 10:42:45 AMQuote from: WackyCat08 on October 28, 2015, 10:42:00 AMWhy would you ever trust a lawyers word?what does this mean wacky mocat? that is a photo of nic cage on a date with the titular (lol) figure from Valley Girl (1983 romantic comedy)It was a v. good post mocat.
It was 3.5%. This year's Houston game was 3.2%. The Toronto start was really and historically bad, but two of the best starts in Roys' history overrides that. Plus, we have won 75% of Cueto's postseason starts.JMHO.
Quote from: royals&ksu_FAN on October 29, 2015, 07:24:45 PMIt was 3.5%. This year's Houston game was 3.2%. The Toronto start was really and historically bad, but two of the best starts in Roys' history overrides that. Plus, we have won 75% of Cueto's postseason starts.JMHO.I wouldn't go that far. I think that of all of our potential ball games, game 6 with Cueto on the mound is our least likely win. Fortunately, this series shouldn't get that far.
Quote from: Rage Against the McKee on October 30, 2015, 09:20:54 AMQuote from: royals&ksu_FAN on October 29, 2015, 07:24:45 PMIt was 3.5%. This year's Houston game was 3.2%. The Toronto start was really and historically bad, but two of the best starts in Roys' history overrides that. Plus, we have won 75% of Cueto's postseason starts.JMHO.I wouldn't go that far. I think that of all of our potential ball games, game 6 with Cueto on the mound is our least likely win. Fortunately, this series shouldn't get that far.2 starts, 17 innings, 3 runs, 4 hits. There is no argument with those numbers being 2 of the best postseason starts in Royals history. I mean I still get Cueto apprehension, but there is no disputing with how dominant he was in those 2 starts. Its exactly why we brought him to this team.
the worst start in the 112 year history of the MLB postseason.
s
Quote from: Rage Against the McKee on October 30, 2015, 09:35:39 AMthe worst start in the 112 year history of the MLB postseason.Fair point. Him not pitching in NY makes me more confident. I think the worst we'd see in game 6 from Cueto is ALDS game 2, but probably something closer to his last 2 starts at the K.
valley date. that's an all-timer.
Quote from: royals&ksu_FAN on October 30, 2015, 09:28:39 AMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on October 30, 2015, 09:20:54 AMQuote from: royals&ksu_FAN on October 29, 2015, 07:24:45 PMIt was 3.5%. This year's Houston game was 3.2%. The Toronto start was really and historically bad, but two of the best starts in Roys' history overrides that. Plus, we have won 75% of Cueto's postseason starts.JMHO.I wouldn't go that far. I think that of all of our potential ball games, game 6 with Cueto on the mound is our least likely win. Fortunately, this series shouldn't get that far.2 starts, 17 innings, 3 runs, 4 hits. There is no argument with those numbers being 2 of the best postseason starts in Royals history. I mean I still get Cueto apprehension, but there is no disputing with how dominant he was in those 2 starts. Its exactly why we brought him to this team.I wasn't arguing that those starts weren't great, just that they don't override the worst start in the 112 year history of the MLB postseason.
