Author Topic: The Royals  (Read 5795328 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Canary

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2962
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #43300 on: August 12, 2015, 09:09:22 PM »
careful _FAN, you will be #1Fan soon
That's funny!

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #43301 on: August 12, 2015, 09:24:10 PM »

I don't agree and I won't. It's all good though. #1Royal

ok, defend your position.  why is esky getting caught at twice the rate he was in previous years?

I'm not completely sure, but probably something to do with when he bats now combined with opponents adjusting to his stealing. He has exclusively batted 1st this year. Before that he mostly batted 8th/9th and sometimes 2nd. He didn't move to 1st until mid-September last year.

Offline bones129

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12132
  • RUN! Tell all the other curs the Law's coming!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #43302 on: August 12, 2015, 09:25:33 PM »
Earth to Ned...

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: The Royals
« Reply #43303 on: August 12, 2015, 09:25:40 PM »
i cant find it on gamecast, who had the error that let an unearned run score?

Offline Canary

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2962
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #43304 on: August 12, 2015, 09:27:17 PM »
i cant find it on gamecast, who had the error that let an unearned run score?
I think that was a hit back to the pitcher. He threw to second but the short stop and second baseman weren't communicating.  I could be wrong though.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #43305 on: August 12, 2015, 09:28:05 PM »

Earth to Ned...

This is bringing back bad Ned memories.

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: The Royals
« Reply #43306 on: August 12, 2015, 09:28:26 PM »
i cant find it on gamecast, who had the error that let an unearned run score?
I think that was a hit back to the pitcher. He threw to second but the short stop and second baseman weren't communicating.  I could be wrong though.

so a FC that resulted in a run, thanks!

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: The Royals
« Reply #43307 on: August 12, 2015, 09:29:12 PM »
 :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry:

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #43308 on: August 12, 2015, 09:29:28 PM »
Dammit Yost.

U haven't done this all year. He is gonna cost us our streak with never losing when leading after 7

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32521
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #43309 on: August 12, 2015, 09:30:56 PM »
Don't even care
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: The Royals
« Reply #43310 on: August 12, 2015, 09:33:36 PM »
YOU rough ridin' BETER WETWILLIE

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #43311 on: August 12, 2015, 09:35:23 PM »
probably something to do with when he bats now combined with opponents adjusting to his stealing. He has exclusively batted 1st this year. Before that he mostly batted 8th/9th and sometimes 2nd. He didn't move to 1st until mid-September last year.

i mean, are you even reading the ridiculous lengths to which you're going to avoid the obvious conclusion?
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline Canary

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2962
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #43312 on: August 12, 2015, 09:36:05 PM »
i cant find it on gamecast, who had the error that let an unearned run score?
I think that was a hit back to the pitcher. He threw to second but the short stop and second baseman weren't communicating.  I could be wrong though.

so a FC that resulted in a run, thanks!
They bobbled the ball.  I think that is where that run came out of. 

Offline TownieCat

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 6993
  • I have no rhythm.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #43313 on: August 12, 2015, 09:36:16 PM »
I'm too stunned to be angry right now. WTF is happening?

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32521
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #43314 on: August 12, 2015, 09:36:26 PM »
I mean the tigers are gonna put like 6 on us in the 8th and I'm all sleepycat.gif
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #43315 on: August 12, 2015, 09:36:36 PM »
Don't even care

woulda been nice to win.  oh well.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: The Royals
« Reply #43316 on: August 12, 2015, 09:37:19 PM »
i cant find it on gamecast, who had the error that let an unearned run score?
I think that was a hit back to the pitcher. He threw to second but the short stop and second baseman weren't communicating.  I could be wrong though.

so a FC that resulted in a run, thanks!
They bobbled the ball.  I think that is where that run came out of. 

timing is a lot of things Canary

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #43317 on: August 12, 2015, 09:38:01 PM »
He takes out Any starter late when the tying run is at the plate.... So the starter can't lose.

Why change tonight.

I'm effing furious our streak is gonna end because of #Yosted BS

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: The Royals
« Reply #43318 on: August 12, 2015, 09:38:54 PM »
can i get a count of #yosted from last year to this?

Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19406
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #43319 on: August 12, 2015, 09:41:05 PM »
not gonna put this one on Yost. Shitty shitty luck
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

Offline Canary

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2962
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #43320 on: August 12, 2015, 09:43:29 PM »
I'm not giving up yet. 

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #43321 on: August 12, 2015, 09:46:50 PM »
I'm not giving up yet.

two runs in two innings vs the tigers bullpen really isn't that hard.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #43322 on: August 12, 2015, 09:49:30 PM »

He takes out Any starter late when the tying run is at the plate.... So the starter can't lose.

Why change tonight.

This is the strange part. After 2 got on with no outs I was surprised he didn't bring someone in, especially since it was already the 8th.

Offline bones129

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12132
  • RUN! Tell all the other curs the Law's coming!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #43323 on: August 12, 2015, 09:51:53 PM »

He takes out Any starter late when the tying run is at the plate.... So the starter can't lose.

Why change tonight.

This is the strange part. After 2 got on with no outs I was surprised he didn't bring someone in, especially since it was already the 8th.

I was irritated, but not surprised. Sticking too long with his starter is one of Ned's worst flaws.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #43324 on: August 12, 2015, 09:55:46 PM »