Author Topic: The Royals  (Read 5889542 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #26550 on: October 09, 2014, 09:16:11 AM »
We play in the mother rough ridin' ALCS tomorrow. I never thought this day would come.
:adios:

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #26551 on: October 09, 2014, 09:25:05 AM »
We play in the mother rough ridin' ALCS tomorrow.

90% rain  :frown:

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #26552 on: October 09, 2014, 09:26:29 AM »
We play in the mother rough ridin' ALCS tomorrow.

90% rain  :frown:
Neither Baltimore nor God can slow us down on the bases
:adios:

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40576
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #26553 on: October 09, 2014, 09:34:28 AM »
do they just push both games back to saturday-sunday if the rain is too much?

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27694
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #26554 on: October 09, 2014, 10:01:00 AM »
Last road game Shields pitched in the rain:

http://espn.go.com/mlb/recap?id=340910106

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #26555 on: October 09, 2014, 10:04:38 AM »
Last road game Shields pitched in the rain:

http://espn.go.com/mlb/recap?id=340910106
I was prepared to dismiss it as a small sample size, but actually I think that is exactly how things will go tomorrow.
:adios:

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27694
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #26556 on: October 09, 2014, 10:09:09 AM »
Last road game Shields pitched in the rain:

http://espn.go.com/mlb/recap?id=340910106
I was prepared to dismiss it as a small sample size, but actually I think that is exactly how things will go tomorrow.

Would take so very, very hard. I'd really enjoy a 1st inning void of homeruns by our opponent.

Offline Phil Titola

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15623
  • He took it out!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #26557 on: October 09, 2014, 10:13:16 AM »
Shields getting offered a pretty large contract by the Royals???

Offline The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9740
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #26558 on: October 09, 2014, 10:13:40 AM »
do they just push both games back to saturday-sunday if the rain is too much?

yes. ive never heard of a double header. rain outs are one of the reasons there is a full day off besides traveling.
I think what my friend Mitch is trying to say is that true love is blind.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27694
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #26559 on: October 09, 2014, 10:14:15 AM »
Shields getting offered a pretty large contract by the Royals???

wut

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #26560 on: October 09, 2014, 10:16:34 AM »
Shields getting offered a pretty large contract by the Royals???

wut
They talked about it this morning on 810. We've reached out to his agent and we want to be in the running for his next contract. However, anything over 2 years and I think it's a waste.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27694
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #26561 on: October 09, 2014, 10:17:17 AM »

Offline mhkpasa

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1416
  • Let's go get a couple bowls of loudmouth soup
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #26562 on: October 09, 2014, 10:18:01 AM »
5 yrs $80 Mill has been floated around

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #26563 on: October 09, 2014, 10:21:38 AM »
Shields getting offered a pretty large contract by the Royals???
It's interesting because we'll get like $10M in extra revenue by making the ALCS
:adios:

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27694
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #26564 on: October 09, 2014, 10:22:49 AM »
James was our 3rd best starter and will be 4th best if Finnegan moves into the rotation. I don't think 5 for 80 makes any sense.

Offline The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9740
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #26565 on: October 09, 2014, 10:26:01 AM »
James was our 3rd best starter and will be 4th best if Finnegan moves into the rotation. I don't think 5 for 80 makes any sense.

argued this this morning with my bros. he did have the lowest ERA and most innings among the starters. hes consistent... however, i agree with you. 5 years is too much for a 32 year old and $16M is too much for the Royals. id do 4 for 50 and thats probably as high as id go.
I think what my friend Mitch is trying to say is that true love is blind.

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40576
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #26566 on: October 09, 2014, 10:28:57 AM »
Shields getting offered a pretty large contract by the Royals???
It's interesting because we'll get like $10M in extra revenue by making the ALCS

wait what

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27694
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #26567 on: October 09, 2014, 10:30:43 AM »
James was our 3rd best starter and will be 4th best if Finnegan moves into the rotation. I don't think 5 for 80 makes any sense.

argued this this morning with my bros. he did have the lowest ERA and most innings among the starters. hes consistent... however, i agree with you. 5 years is too much for a 32 year old and $16M is too much for the Royals. id do 4 for 50 and thats probably as high as id go.

Duffy and Ventura had lower ERAs.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #26568 on: October 09, 2014, 10:31:23 AM »
James was our 3rd best starter and will be 4th best if Finnegan moves into the rotation. I don't think 5 for 80 makes any sense.
Listen bud. I'm going crazy over Finnegan as well, but wait for him to have a full season under his belt before claiming he's better than big game James.

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #26569 on: October 09, 2014, 10:31:44 AM »
Shields getting offered a pretty large contract by the Royals???
It's interesting because we'll get like $10M in extra revenue by making the ALCS

wait what
Old article, but the same sharing rules are in place. It will depend on # of games played and ticket sales. www.fangraphs.com/blogs/estimating-postseason-revenue-for-players-and-teams/
:adios:

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #26570 on: October 09, 2014, 10:32:13 AM »
the qualifying offer is 15+.  obviously, he'll get that.  i could see a two year offer for a little more per year.  can't imagine the royals will offer a long contract at that price level.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #26571 on: October 09, 2014, 10:34:25 AM »
He's not going to want anything under 3 years. He's too smart for that.

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #26572 on: October 09, 2014, 10:34:37 AM »
James was our 3rd best starter and will be 4th best if Finnegan moves into the rotation. I don't think 5 for 80 makes any sense.

argued this this morning with my bros. he did have the lowest ERA and most innings among the starters. hes consistent... however, i agree with you. 5 years is too much for a 32 year old and $16M is too much for the Royals. id do 4 for 50 and thats probably as high as id go.

Duffy and Ventura had lower ERAs.
Shields had a better FIP and xFIP, indicating that there was a fair amount of luck involved in Ventura and Duffy having lower ERAs. Shields is our most valuable pitcher.
:adios:

Offline The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9740
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #26573 on: October 09, 2014, 10:34:48 AM »
James was our 3rd best starter and will be 4th best if Finnegan moves into the rotation. I don't think 5 for 80 makes any sense.

argued this this morning with my bros. he did have the lowest ERA and most innings among the starters. hes consistent... however, i agree with you. 5 years is too much for a 32 year old and $16M is too much for the Royals. id do 4 for 50 and thats probably as high as id go.

Duffy and Ventura had lower ERAs.

Ventura has a 0.01 lower ERA and yes, Duffy's was lower. He didn't show up bold as a starter for some reason on ESPN... my bad.
I think what my friend Mitch is trying to say is that true love is blind.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27694
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #26574 on: October 09, 2014, 10:35:14 AM »
James was our 3rd best starter and will be 4th best if Finnegan moves into the rotation. I don't think 5 for 80 makes any sense.
Listen bud. I'm going crazy over Finnegan as well, but wait for him to have a full season under his belt before claiming he's better than big game James.

Probably not today, but over the next 5 years I'd take Big Game Brandon