Author Topic: The Royals  (Read 4686398 times)

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Alpinist

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 140
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #8075 on: December 25, 2013, 09:31:34 PM »
Here's some news.  My wife saw Billy and his wife at LuluLemon @ 119 yesterday.  He wears an XL jacket, his wife is only so-so for a pro athlete's wife, but her rock is "ginormous" (I hate this made up word).
Its 2 words, that are already synonyms, needlessly combined into one new word, that still means the same thing.
"enormic" is a much better version

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27092
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #8076 on: January 01, 2014, 01:25:48 PM »
2014 is our year. We will win the division and make at least the ALCS.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #8077 on: January 01, 2014, 04:59:31 PM »
2014 is our year. We will win the division and make at least the ALCS.

 :surprised:


Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13574
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #8078 on: January 01, 2014, 05:00:42 PM »
_fan hates the royals guys

Offline sunny_cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14367
  • eff off
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #8079 on: January 01, 2014, 05:01:59 PM »
_fan hates the royals guys

Apparently, your ban had no effect on _FAN.

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20499
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #8080 on: January 01, 2014, 06:42:10 PM »
2014 is our year. We will win the division and make at least the ALCS.

 :lol:

Offline j-dub

  • fattyfest dance champion '14
  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 4782
  • "I wanna get hurt!"
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #8081 on: January 05, 2014, 04:03:30 PM »
2014 is our year. We will win the division and make at least the ALCS.

 :surprised:



i believe.
"I started calling him John during the game, cause he was rocking it like No. 7 -- like Elway," Harper said."

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #8082 on: January 05, 2014, 04:04:22 PM »
Royals, man.

Offline j-dub

  • fattyfest dance champion '14
  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 4782
  • "I wanna get hurt!"
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #8083 on: January 05, 2014, 04:08:01 PM »
"I started calling him John during the game, cause he was rocking it like No. 7 -- like Elway," Harper said."

Offline Dub

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3014
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #8084 on: January 05, 2014, 04:29:18 PM »
http://www.rotoworld.com/headlines/mlb/417318/royals-could-be-in-mix-for-kendrys-morales

well guys, thoughts?

Feel like him and Billy are the same player?? I guess if there was a team that wanted Billy and we could get him for less?

Offline Diamond Dave

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 101
  • Rock the EMAW
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #8085 on: January 05, 2014, 05:34:49 PM »
Hell and no on Morales. Older, lower projected WAR and more expensive.

Offline Dub

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3014
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #8086 on: January 05, 2014, 05:51:03 PM »
Hell and no on Morales. Older, lower projected WAR and more expensive.

He killed Billy's WAR this year?   :dunno:

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20499
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #8087 on: January 05, 2014, 10:09:08 PM »
Morales would be a terrible move.

I think the royals should try to sign Santana.

Offline EMAWmeister

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 8957
  • Livin' it up
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #8088 on: January 05, 2014, 11:07:45 PM »
Hell and no on Morales. Older, lower projected WAR and more expensive.

He killed Billy's WAR this year?   :dunno:

You sure about that?

Offline Dub

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3014
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #8089 on: January 05, 2014, 11:19:23 PM »
Hell and no on Morales. Older, lower projected WAR and more expensive.

He killed Billy's WAR this year?   :dunno:

You sure about that?

Morales WAR = 2.7
Butler WAR = 1.5

 :dunno:

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #8090 on: January 05, 2014, 11:21:02 PM »
Morales would be a terrible move.

I think the royals should try to sign Santana.

If we signed Santana I would literally run to KC and jerk off Glass and GMDM

Offline Dub

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3014
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #8091 on: January 05, 2014, 11:22:23 PM »
Morales would be a terrible move.

I think the royals should try to sign Santana.

If we signed Santana I would literally run to KC and jerk off Glass and GMDM

It would be a pretty boss move.

Offline j-dub

  • fattyfest dance champion '14
  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 4782
  • "I wanna get hurt!"
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #8092 on: January 05, 2014, 11:27:55 PM »
Morales would be a terrible move.

I think the royals should try to sign Santana.

If we signed Santana I would literally run to KC and jerk off Glass and GMDM

halvesies?!?
"I started calling him John during the game, cause he was rocking it like No. 7 -- like Elway," Harper said."

Offline bones129

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12132
  • RUN! Tell all the other curs the Law's coming!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #8093 on: January 05, 2014, 11:29:01 PM »
Morales would be a terrible move.

I think the royals should try to sign Santana.

If we signed Santana I would literally run to KC and jerk off Glass and GMDM

I understand your enthusiasm if we sign ES, but your suggested reponse might be a bit extreme. Let us know if you follow through IF we get ES signed.

Offline Diamond Dave

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 101
  • Rock the EMAW
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #8094 on: January 06, 2014, 02:05:33 AM »
Hell and no on Morales. Older, lower projected WAR and more expensive.

He killed Billy's WAR this year?   :dunno:

Fangraphs had Butler at a 1.4 and Morales at a 1.2. Keep in mind we'd also be forfeiting a first round pick.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27092
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #8095 on: January 08, 2014, 10:20:00 PM »
Frank Thomas, Tom Glavine, Greg Maddux,

Three studs in the HOF

Offline bones129

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12132
  • RUN! Tell all the other curs the Law's coming!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #8096 on: January 09, 2014, 01:00:17 PM »

 :thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs:

Offline KSU-Krazie

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 198
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #8097 on: January 09, 2014, 03:15:11 PM »
How did none of the Killer Bs get in? HOF voting is so rough ridin' dumb.

Offline TownieCat

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 6993
  • I have no rhythm.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #8098 on: January 09, 2014, 03:43:08 PM »
How did none of the Killer Bs get in? HOF voting is so rough ridin' dumb.

Biggio just barely missed and will likely get in next year. Everyone thinks Bagwell did PEDs. Berkman is still playing.

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: The Royals
« Reply #8099 on: January 09, 2014, 08:55:21 PM »
I'm ready for baseball season again you guys! :royals: