Author Topic: The Royals  (Read 4770831 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53679
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #61400 on: May 10, 2016, 10:41:12 PM »
Dax, you're over 50 in gods land. It's near midnight there. Take care of your family. What did you do before the Internet?

 :lol: 

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #61401 on: May 10, 2016, 10:47:13 PM »
Tap out noted, daxipad! :lol:

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53679
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #61402 on: May 10, 2016, 10:50:28 PM »
Yes, the old "take care of your family" always forces a tap out, you're such a bad ass WT.    :ohno:

Offline kslim

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 10531
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #61403 on: May 11, 2016, 09:35:42 AM »
 :goodbyecruelworld:

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #61404 on: May 11, 2016, 04:43:43 PM »

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 46688
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #61405 on: May 11, 2016, 06:25:49 PM »
bases loaded in the 1st w/ 1 out, good sign

sal 3 run dong! 


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30586
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #61406 on: May 11, 2016, 06:35:30 PM »
Hitting a sac fly instead of into a double play from Gordon made me very happy.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13593
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #61407 on: May 11, 2016, 06:58:28 PM »
Our rotation is so effed

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #61408 on: May 11, 2016, 07:46:44 PM »
Mo had the 1 good game with HR, 2 hits, 4 RBI.

15 of his last other 16 gms....5 hits, 6 total bases in 55 ABs

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #61409 on: May 11, 2016, 07:48:40 PM »
I'm going to miss the lead in this game


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30586
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #61410 on: May 11, 2016, 07:56:59 PM »
Mo had the 1 good game with HR, 2 hits, 4 RBI.

15 of his last other 16 gms....5 hits, 6 total bases in 55 ABs


I went to go see how god awful he is relative to the mlb and found Albert Pujols, Mark Texiara, Joey Bautista, Tulo, Prince Fielder and Justin Upton right there next to him.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #61411 on: May 11, 2016, 08:01:51 PM »
It seems really hard to win a game right now. It was nice when it seemed like winning was easy.

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #61412 on: May 11, 2016, 08:33:52 PM »
52 strikes 46 balls.  Not exactly a stellar outing, but he only gave up 3 runs in 6.0 because he got a few big outs

Last 3 starts, he has allowed 29 runners in 14 Innings. But what is also troublesome is only 5 Ks and very few swing and misses, especially on the FB

Offline bones129

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12132
  • RUN! Tell all the other curs the Law's coming!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #61413 on: May 11, 2016, 08:34:34 PM »
MO!!

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #61414 on: May 11, 2016, 09:28:07 PM »
Thanks guys.

Offline cfbandyman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9520
  • To da 'ville.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #61415 on: May 11, 2016, 09:30:44 PM »
Needed that win. Felt good. :royals:
A&M Style: 1/19/13 Co-Champion of THE ED's College Basketball Challenge

The art of the deal with it poors

OG Elon hater with a tesla


Offline bones129

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12132
  • RUN! Tell all the other curs the Law's coming!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #61416 on: May 11, 2016, 09:33:13 PM »
 :royals:

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30586
    • View Profile
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #61418 on: May 11, 2016, 09:56:58 PM »
Posse Stat of the night...

Last year, we won 84% of the time when our starter gave up 2 ER or less, going at least 5.0 Innings. But we won 28 times when our starter didn't do that.

Tonight was only the 2nd time we had won this year when our starter failed to go at least 5.0 giving up 2 or less ERs. 

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39255
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #61419 on: May 12, 2016, 08:10:46 AM »
remember in 2014 how important it was for the royals to score 4 or more runs?

2014:
4 or more: 83 times, 69-14 (.831)
under 4: 79 times, 20-59 (.253)

in 2015 it didn't matter quite as much because the royals were just better all around:
4 or more: 91 times, 74-17 (.813)
under 4: 71 times, 21-50 (.296)

so far 2016 feels like 2014:
4 or more: 18 times, 15-3 (.833)
under 4: 15 times, 1-14 (.067)

yeesh, need to win some 3-2 and 2-1 type games

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 46688
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #61421 on: May 12, 2016, 08:28:28 AM »
nedcuses


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39255
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #61422 on: May 12, 2016, 08:39:07 AM »
Nedcuses are the opposite of Brucecuses, because oscar's are meant to throw players under the bus, while Ned's are meant to protect players from criticism

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #61423 on: May 12, 2016, 08:54:33 AM »
Yes, Mocat really nailed this one. If anything, he's protecting Dayton on these signings.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #61424 on: May 12, 2016, 01:41:44 PM »