Author Topic: The Royals  (Read 5876169 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29369
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60375 on: April 25, 2016, 11:45:09 PM »

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60376 on: April 25, 2016, 11:46:17 PM »
that sonofabitch.   :curse:
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60377 on: April 26, 2016, 08:48:22 AM »
https://twitter.com/DBLesky/status/724954199310622720

This is a good reminder to me to enjoy these times when we are good.

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47974
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60378 on: April 26, 2016, 08:50:19 AM »
i'm officially announcing a 15 game suspension for lorenzo cain


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32550
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60379 on: April 26, 2016, 08:54:24 AM »
i'm officially announcing a 15 game suspension for lorenzo cain


That's rich considering you aren't even a week into serving your own.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40576
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60380 on: April 26, 2016, 08:57:19 AM »
remember in 2014 how important it was for the royals to score 4 or more runs?

2014:
4 or more: 83 times, 69-14 (.831)
under 4: 79 times, 20-59 (.253)

in 2015 it didn't matter quite as much because the royals were just better all around:
4 or more: 91 times, 74-17 (.813)
under 4: 71 times, 21-50 (.296)

so far 2016 feels like 2014:
4 or more: 11 times, 11-0 (1.000)
under 4: 8 times, 1-7 (.125)
« Last Edit: April 26, 2016, 09:01:41 AM by mocat »

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60381 on: April 26, 2016, 09:02:50 AM »
remember in 2014 how important it was for the royals to score 4 or more runs?

2014:
4 or more: 83 times, 69-14 (.831)
under 4: 79 times, 20-59 (.253)

in 2015 it didn't matter quite as much because the royals were just better all around:
4 or more: 91 times, 74-17 (.813)
under 4: 71 times, 21-50 (.296)

so far 2016 feels like 2014:
4 or more: 11 times, 11-0 (1.000)
under 4: 8 times, 1-7 (.125)

So we're on pace to score 4 or more at the same rate as the last two years?

Will take.

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40576
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60382 on: April 26, 2016, 09:07:47 AM »
remember in 2014 how important it was for the royals to score 4 or more runs?

2014:
4 or more: 83 times, 69-14 (.831)
under 4: 79 times, 20-59 (.253)

in 2015 it didn't matter quite as much because the royals were just better all around:
4 or more: 91 times, 74-17 (.813)
under 4: 71 times, 21-50 (.296)

so far 2016 feels like 2014:
4 or more: 11 times, 11-0 (1.000)
under 4: 8 times, 1-7 (.125)

So we're on pace to score 4 or more at the same rate as the last two years?

Will take.

it appears so.

_FAN, think about how amazing 2015 was. When the royals scored fewer than 4 runs, they still won almost 30% of the time. that is insane.
for comparison:
when royals OPPONENTS scored fewer than 4 runs, opponents won less than 16% of the time.
Royals held their opponents under 4 runs 83 times, and the royals won 70 of those games. pretty fantastic

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47974
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60383 on: April 26, 2016, 09:46:19 AM »
Hey clams, see ya in fifteen days you filthy animal.
listen you son of a bitch, i'll be the one handing out suspensions around here.  rubber arm young had a fluke couple of innings, big whoop.


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60384 on: April 26, 2016, 03:06:43 PM »
Yep MoCat, scoring 4+ runs is still a key factor in us winning games.  I'm sure its important for other teams too, but not a win % of 83.2 from 14-16'.  That's almost exactly winning 5 of every 6 games.


The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60385 on: April 26, 2016, 08:16:28 PM »
this game still doesnt start for like an hour  :curse:

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32550
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60386 on: April 26, 2016, 08:24:03 PM »
Guys our best starting pitcher is throwing tonight, and they are throwing their not best pitcher. 
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60387 on: April 26, 2016, 08:47:12 PM »
Guys our best starting pitcher is throwing tonight, and they are throwing their not best pitcher.
Try and break this down for lib^7 how this works.

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67517
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60388 on: April 26, 2016, 08:52:04 PM »
 :blank:
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67517
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60389 on: April 26, 2016, 08:56:26 PM »
i wonder if la's #1 will have to throw against our not #1.  oh crap that happened last night!  hmm, it's almost like all teams deal with that sort of thing
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60390 on: April 26, 2016, 09:00:22 PM »
yeah they do. thats not really the dilemma here tho, it's if YOU understand why.

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67517
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60391 on: April 26, 2016, 09:01:19 PM »
there is no dilemma here
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60392 on: April 26, 2016, 09:02:59 PM »
wacky's statement didnt seem weird or random  :dunno:

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67517
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60393 on: April 26, 2016, 09:04:58 PM »
wacky's statement didnt seem weird or random  :dunno:

not for wackycat08, that's for sure
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60394 on: April 26, 2016, 09:06:11 PM »
chill out lib, games about to start  :excited:

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67517
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60395 on: April 26, 2016, 09:07:29 PM »
yeah, i haven't eaten yet and it started raining again and i'm just  :angry:
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60396 on: April 26, 2016, 09:10:11 PM »
Guys our best starting pitcher is throwing tonight, and they are throwing their not best pitcher.

if the royals don't win tonight, i'm going to be very disappointed.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32550
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60397 on: April 26, 2016, 09:10:25 PM »
i forgot we torched these guys in the playoffs too. 
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60398 on: April 26, 2016, 09:11:18 PM »
like 2 years ago right?  i forget which order we torched all these teams in

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67517
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #60399 on: April 26, 2016, 09:11:53 PM »
dong
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite