0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: royals&ksu_FAN on November 02, 2015, 01:39:23 PMI think its somewhat fair to say that Joe Pos was once the D Scott of the Roys. Anyway, this is enjoyable: http://sportsworld.nbcsports.com/posnanski-royals-win-world-series/wow!
I think its somewhat fair to say that Joe Pos was once the D Scott of the Roys. Anyway, this is enjoyable: http://sportsworld.nbcsports.com/posnanski-royals-win-world-series/
Quote from: sys on November 02, 2015, 01:50:14 PMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on November 02, 2015, 11:40:34 AMQuote from: WildcatNkilt on November 02, 2015, 11:38:21 AMIs that math right? 1 in 34.7m? I want to use that stat for conversation piece. The math is right, but it's only an accurate figure if you believe in Fangraphs' ability to place an accurate win % in the first place.the math is nothing close to correct. even mocat would get closer.What number are you getting?
Quote from: Rage Against the McKee on November 02, 2015, 11:40:34 AMQuote from: WildcatNkilt on November 02, 2015, 11:38:21 AMIs that math right? 1 in 34.7m? I want to use that stat for conversation piece. The math is right, but it's only an accurate figure if you believe in Fangraphs' ability to place an accurate win % in the first place.the math is nothing close to correct. even mocat would get closer.
Quote from: WildcatNkilt on November 02, 2015, 11:38:21 AMIs that math right? 1 in 34.7m? I want to use that stat for conversation piece. The math is right, but it's only an accurate figure if you believe in Fangraphs' ability to place an accurate win % in the first place.
Is that math right? 1 in 34.7m? I want to use that stat for conversation piece.
Quote from: Rage Against the McKee on November 02, 2015, 02:11:33 PMQuote from: sys on November 02, 2015, 01:50:14 PMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on November 02, 2015, 11:40:34 AMQuote from: WildcatNkilt on November 02, 2015, 11:38:21 AMIs that math right? 1 in 34.7m? I want to use that stat for conversation piece. The math is right, but it's only an accurate figure if you believe in Fangraphs' ability to place an accurate win % in the first place.the math is nothing close to correct. even mocat would get closer.What number are you getting?the 1 in 34.7 million is for the prob of winning 7 of 7 games in which their lowest win expectancy were the listed %s. the royals didn't win 7 of 7 of that group of games. they won 7 of 12 games in which they had a win% below whatever the arbitrary win% cutoff was that includes those games but excludes their other 4 wins.
s
sorry for deadspin but just look at thishttp://deadspin.com/here-is-your-gallery-of-sad-mets-fans-1740013674
Salvy really is a master with that jug.
since i missed 30 pages, did anyone post the pic of Hosmer sliding into home and the Mets fans all going :o :o :o :o in the background?
Amazing photo
Quote from: WillieWatanabe on November 02, 2015, 02:45:01 PMsince i missed 30 pages, did anyone post the pic of Hosmer sliding into home and the Mets fans all going :o :o :o :o in the background?Quote from: steve dave on November 02, 2015, 06:29:51 AMAmazing photo