Author Topic: luke winn  (Read 10782 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
luke winn
« on: November 20, 2010, 04:54:32 PM »


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88638
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: luke winn
« Reply #1 on: November 20, 2010, 08:07:11 PM »
Yeah, he's great. Also super emaw.

Offline mcmwcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5313
  • trips: "MCMW"
    • View Profile
Re: luke winn
« Reply #2 on: November 20, 2010, 08:26:33 PM »
do we have any chance at ever landing another top 100 RSCI

 :blindfold:

Offline mcmwcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5313
  • trips: "MCMW"
    • View Profile
Re: luke winn
« Reply #3 on: November 20, 2010, 08:32:49 PM »
PGs have biggest impact.  expected, i guess.
 
predicted Selby impact ?  i'm guessing huge.  especially considering the rest of KU's team is loaded w/ JRs and SRs



Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19406
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: luke winn
« Reply #5 on: December 09, 2010, 03:30:33 PM »
 :frown:
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles


Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: luke winn
« Reply #7 on: December 09, 2010, 03:46:24 PM »
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/luke_winn/12/07/freshmen.who.fit/index.html

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/luke_winn/12/09/power.rankings/index.html

We dropped three slots because of free throw shooting?

:facepalm:

a)  don't be Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)
b)  duke didn't retain the #1 spot because of who assisted who
c)  the 1st article is far more interesting
d)  don't be Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Online michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55975
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: luke winn
« Reply #8 on: December 09, 2010, 03:48:53 PM »
15 seems about right.  don't see final four personnel, but whatevs.

good articles, overall.

Offline mcmwcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5313
  • trips: "MCMW"
    • View Profile
Re: luke winn
« Reply #9 on: December 09, 2010, 03:51:07 PM »

 :love:

Offline EllToPay

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5174
  • Typical EMAW
    • View Profile
Re: luke winn
« Reply #10 on: December 09, 2010, 03:52:53 PM »
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/luke_winn/12/07/freshmen.who.fit/index.html

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/luke_winn/12/09/power.rankings/index.html

We dropped three slots because of free throw shooting?

:facepalm:

a)  don't be Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)
b)  duke didn't retain the #1 spot because of who assisted who
c)  the 1st article is far more interesting
d)  don't be Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

Duke is #1 because they're #1, and they didn't do anything to deserve to be dropped.

I was commenting on the second article, I didn't feel a need to comment on the first.

It's not a Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) question to ask why a team, who went on the road to a Pac-10 team and win, drops three spots.


Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: luke winn
« Reply #12 on: December 09, 2010, 04:31:41 PM »
b)  duke didn't retain the #1 spot because of who assisted who


Duke is #1 because they're #1, and they didn't do anything to deserve to be dropped.

It's not a Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) question to ask why a team, who went on the road to a Pac-10 team and win, drops three spots.

each team's commentary does not explain, or attempt to justify, the team's ranking.  they are just interesting observos or snippets of analysis.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline AzCat

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 966
    • View Profile
Re: luke winn
« Reply #13 on: December 09, 2010, 04:35:34 PM »
15 seems about right.  don't see final four personnel, but whatevs.

good articles, overall.

Still 5-10 spots too high. 

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38102
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: luke winn
« Reply #14 on: December 09, 2010, 04:36:07 PM »

 :love:


This is the kind of graphic that deserves a theme song.   :love:

Offline EllToPay

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5174
  • Typical EMAW
    • View Profile
Re: luke winn
« Reply #15 on: December 09, 2010, 04:47:11 PM »
b)  duke didn't retain the #1 spot because of who assisted who


Duke is #1 because they're #1, and they didn't do anything to deserve to be dropped.

It's not a Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) question to ask why a team, who went on the road to a Pac-10 team and win, drops three spots.

each team's commentary does not explain, or attempt to justify, the team's ranking.  they are just interesting observos or snippets of analysis.

That's fine, I agree with the 15 ranking.

But again, why the drop?

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: luke winn
« Reply #16 on: December 09, 2010, 05:03:50 PM »
But again, why the drop?

who cares?  this isn't kenpom.  he's just the most interesting mainstream (maybe allstream) bball writer working right now.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20997
    • View Profile
Re: luke winn
« Reply #17 on: December 09, 2010, 05:56:56 PM »
But again, why the drop?

who cares?  this isn't kenpom.  he's just the most interesting mainstream (maybe allstream) bball writer working right now.

You know what was kenpom?  This gloriously awkward exchange:

Quote
I asked the Jayhawks' Markieff Morris, "You're leading the nation in defensive rebounding -- can you explain why you've been so good at it this season?"

His response: "I'm leading the nation in defensive rebounding?"

"Not in raw numbers, but percentage-wise, yeah. You're getting like 36 percent." (It was actually 36.6, but saying that, and getting into a kenpom.com discussion, didn't seem like a good idea at the time.)

"In actual numbers, probably not -- I'm only playing 20 minutes a game."

"Anyway, is there any kind of technique to it, or philosophy of getting boards?"

"I've got quick twitches, you know? Once the ball goes up, I just find out where it's coming off. Most of the time, I don't even block out. Because I've got a knack for just going and getting it. Most of the time I just outsmart them -- go around them, fight around them, things like that."

Read more: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/luke_winn/12/09/power.rankings/index.html#ixzz17f6kqOBY

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88638
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: luke winn
« Reply #18 on: December 09, 2010, 05:58:26 PM »
Luke is very good

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20997
    • View Profile
Re: luke winn
« Reply #19 on: December 09, 2010, 06:04:03 PM »
Luke is very good

He did 16 blog entries with original analysis.  Lazy turds all over the place never do that.

At some point each year, everyone should force themselves to read a Rick Reilly column or two.  It will be an experience so profound, it may change your politics.

Offline Immaculate1

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 330
    • View Profile
Re: luke winn
« Reply #20 on: December 09, 2010, 10:19:05 PM »
Gtown at 5 looks great right about now... :rolleyes:

Offline mcmwcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5313
  • trips: "MCMW"
    • View Profile

Offline EllToPay

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5174
  • Typical EMAW
    • View Profile
Re: luke winn
« Reply #22 on: December 10, 2010, 08:48:36 AM »
But again, why the drop?

who cares?  this isn't kenpom.  he's just the most interesting mainstream (maybe allstream) bball writer working right now.

so the most interesting mainstream writer cites the terrible FT% as our biggest concern, and it's not discussed? considering that FT% is frowned upon around here as a dumb topic?

interesting.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: luke winn
« Reply #23 on: December 10, 2010, 09:02:00 AM »
But again, why the drop?

who cares?  this isn't kenpom.  he's just the most interesting mainstream (maybe allstream) bball writer working right now.

so the most interesting mainstream writer cites the terrible FT% as our biggest concern, and it's not discussed? considering that FT% is frowned upon around here as a dumb topic?

interesting.

FT% staying under 60% is a legitimate concern, but I was pleased to see a 55% FTrate vs Alcorn.  

Overall I think there have been improvements; Pullen is nearly up to 70% and Samuels is shooting over 60% (best in his career), and Kelly is back up above 50% and was 7-11 vs Alcorn.  Those 3 are going to shoot the bulk of our FTs and if they get to the line and shoot what they should, our %-age will increase pretty quickly.

Sprads also showed he can hit big FTs at the end of our game and is our best FT shooter and Russell has shot very well.

The concern really comes from the absolutely terrible shooting of just a few players.  I can't help but think Irving's numbers will get much better if he's playing; he showed last year he's much better than a 1-9 FT shooter.  Same with Judge, he won't be much over 50%, but he's better than the 2-12 so far.

Then you have JHR and Asprilla (both are 7-20), and I don't know how much better they can be.  JHR should be able to shoot around the 50% he shot last year.  The real problem could be Asprilla, as a FR he led FIU in attempts (by A LOT with 142 attempts) and only shot 45%.  So he has proven he's going to get fouled a lot and not make half.
« Last Edit: December 10, 2010, 09:03:31 AM by ksu_FAN »

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45942
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: luke winn
« Reply #24 on: December 10, 2010, 09:07:16 AM »
But again, why the drop?

who cares?  this isn't kenpom.  he's just the most interesting mainstream (maybe allstream) bball writer working right now.

so the most interesting mainstream writer cites the terrible FT% as our biggest concern, and it's not discussed? considering that FT% is frowned upon around here as a dumb topic?

interesting.

Not interesting at all.  Everyone knitters that ft's are a problem at this point.  The percentage is far away from an acceptable deviance of the ncaa average.  Most importantly attempts and makes are way down.  I wouldn't care that we are shooting 50% if there were 50 attempts a game.