Author Topic: O'Donnell (O'Donnell Bush Master Thread)  (Read 28593 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jeffy

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1590
  • Hello Wilbur.
    • View Profile
Re: O'Donnell
« Reply #125 on: October 29, 2010, 10:14:48 AM »
Must be nice to be a liberal and not have any morals or expectations to live up to.

Online Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: O'Donnell
« Reply #126 on: October 29, 2010, 10:18:48 AM »
Must be nice to be a liberal and not have any morals or expectations to live up to.

Must be nice to be able to say that you have better morals than your opponent and that you have strong Christian values while you go whore yourself out on Halloween with some dude you don't even know.

Offline Jeffy

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1590
  • Hello Wilbur.
    • View Profile
Re: O'Donnell
« Reply #127 on: October 29, 2010, 10:27:38 AM »
Must be nice to be a liberal and not have any morals or expectations to live up to.

Must be nice to be able to say that you have better morals than your opponent and that you have strong Christian values while you go whore yourself out on Halloween with some dude you don't even know.

BOOM, ROASTED!

 :facepalm:

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20997
    • View Profile
Re: O'Donnell
« Reply #128 on: October 29, 2010, 10:31:30 AM »
What does consensual sex have to do with morals?  Answer:  Almost nothing.

Sugar Dick

  • Guest
Re: O'Donnell
« Reply #129 on: October 29, 2010, 10:31:45 AM »
Must be nice to be a liberal and not have any morals or expectations to live up to.

Must be nice to be able to say that you have better morals than your opponent and that you have strong Christian values while you go whore yourself out on Halloween with some dude you don't even know.

I don't know enough about C O'D to know if she'd be a good "leader", but do you seriously believe that story is true?

Online Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: O'Donnell
« Reply #130 on: October 29, 2010, 10:33:43 AM »
What does consensual sex have to do with morals?  Answer:  Almost nothing.

It's not having consensual sex that is immoral. It is condemning others for having consensual sex while you participate in the activity yourself.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88576
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: O'Donnell
« Reply #131 on: October 29, 2010, 10:41:11 AM »
Guys, her verjyna sounds gross.  Just a fwiw here. 

Online Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: O'Donnell
« Reply #132 on: October 29, 2010, 11:08:01 AM »
Guys, her verjyna sounds gross.  Just a fwiw here. 

Somebody should send her this for Christmas.

Offline Dirty Sanchez

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1749
    • View Profile
Re: O'Donnell
« Reply #133 on: October 29, 2010, 12:01:33 PM »
What does consensual sex have to do with morals?  Answer:  Almost nothing.

Would you go out and have consensual sex with someone other than your wife?

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20997
    • View Profile
Re: O'Donnell
« Reply #134 on: October 29, 2010, 12:18:56 PM »
What does consensual sex have to do with morals?  Answer:  Almost nothing.

Would you go out and have consensual sex with someone other than your wife?

Cheating is the morals part.

Offline Jeffy

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1590
  • Hello Wilbur.
    • View Profile
Re: O'Donnell
« Reply #135 on: October 29, 2010, 12:22:40 PM »
So what is a sexless one-night stand?

Offline 06wildcat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1666
    • View Profile
Re: O'Donnell
« Reply #136 on: October 29, 2010, 12:33:11 PM »
What does consensual sex have to do with morals?  Answer:  Almost nothing.

Would you go out and have consensual sex with someone other than your wife?

Since I'm not married, sure. Unless there' O'Donnell bush  :horrorsurprise:

Sugar Dick

  • Guest
Re: O'Donnell
« Reply #137 on: October 29, 2010, 01:07:07 PM »
What does consensual sex have to do with morals?  Answer:  Almost nothing.

Almost nothing?

I love you self-defeating posts.  This was one of my favorites

I do not think any honest reading of the personal beliefs, practices or intent of the founders of the Declaration and Constitution would deserve the designation "founded on religious principles" in any meaningful way.  Religion has clearly shaped the history of United States, like every civilization in recorded history.  The United States remains much more religious than Europe and other states that have a history of state sponsored religion.  The religious diversity and inter-faith relationships in the United States is a strength where for others it continues to be a weakness.

 :lol:

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20997
    • View Profile
Re: O'Donnell (O'Donnell Bush Master Thread)
« Reply #138 on: October 29, 2010, 01:12:00 PM »
No idea what you are trying to do there.  Really no clue.

Sugar Dick

  • Guest
Re: O'Donnell (O'Donnell Bush Master Thread)
« Reply #139 on: October 29, 2010, 01:17:55 PM »
No idea what you are trying to do there.  Really no clue. I'm probably definitely sure I don't know exactly what you're saying.

this better suits you

Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7076
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile
Re: O'Donnell (O'Donnell Bush Master Thread)
« Reply #140 on: October 29, 2010, 01:25:24 PM »
she should try selling pictures of her hairy bush to pay rent rather than using campaign contributions..... just a thought

http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2010/10/29/business-financial-impact-us-delaware-senate-poll_8057939.html?boxes=Homepagebusinessnews

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20997
    • View Profile
Re: O'Donnell (O'Donnell Bush Master Thread)
« Reply #141 on: October 29, 2010, 01:25:35 PM »
No idea what you are trying to do there.  Really no clue. I'm probably definitely sure I don't know exactly what you're saying.

this better suits you

What was incompatiable?  I can't believe both things?

Sugar Dick

  • Guest
Re: O'Donnell (O'Donnell Bush Master Thread)
« Reply #142 on: October 29, 2010, 01:43:34 PM »
No idea what you are trying to do there.  Really no clue. I'm probably definitely sure I don't know exactly what you're saying.

this better suits you

What was incompatiable?  I can't believe both things?

Not when you start by saying one isn't true.  Unless you believe the untruth of the matter to be true  :horrorsurprise:  perception is reality

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7833
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: O'Donnell (O'Donnell Bush Master Thread)
« Reply #143 on: October 29, 2010, 01:46:55 PM »
She sounds like a tease that likes a few drinks.  :users:

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88576
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: O'Donnell (O'Donnell Bush Master Thread)
« Reply #144 on: October 29, 2010, 09:12:12 PM »
Me: You know that uppity running for congress lady who hates abortions and sex and doesn't know about the supreme court?
Mrs. dave:  Yeah
Me: She doesn't handle her landscaping and it's all jungley and gross
Mrs. dave:  No wonder she hates sex and abortions
 :surprised:

Offline Dirty Sanchez

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1749
    • View Profile
Re: O'Donnell (O'Donnell Bush Master Thread)
« Reply #145 on: October 30, 2010, 07:14:03 AM »
You read it on the internet, so it must be true.

Online Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile

Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7076
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile
Re: O'Donnell (O'Donnell Bush Master Thread)
« Reply #147 on: November 03, 2010, 03:22:00 PM »
my favorite part about her is that she didn't understand that the first amendmant prevented her from being burned at the stake for being a witch.


Online Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: O'Donnell (O'Donnell Bush Master Thread)
« Reply #148 on: November 03, 2010, 05:29:16 PM »
my favorite part about her is that she didn't understand that the first amendmant prevented her from being burned at the stake for being a witch.



Talk about a singed minge.

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Support Christine O'Donnell: contribute to her rent errr campaign
« Reply #149 on: December 29, 2010, 11:20:51 PM »
Christine O'Donnell, ex-Senate candidate, subject of federal campaign funds probe


 Discussion Policy
By Jerry Markon and Sandhya Somashekhar
Washington Post Staff Writers
Wednesday, December 29, 2010; 10:36 PM
The Justice Department is investigating whether former U.S. Senate candidate Christine O'Donnell violated federal law by diverting campaign funds for personal use, law enforcement sources said Wednesday.

THIS STORY
Christine O'Donnell, ex-Senate candidate, subject of federal campaign funds probe
Despite record spending, politicians still have $400 million in campaign funds
In 2012, Democrats plan to fight cash with cash
View All Items in This Story
The probe of the Delaware Republican arose in response to a complaint from Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. The watchdog group alleged in September that O'Donnell had used campaign funds for rent, meals and other personal expenses.

O'Donnell stunned the political world that month by riding a wave of tea party support to defeat veteran Rep. Michael N. Castle in the Republican primary. But her campaign was dogged by questions about her personal and campaign finances, and a trail of controversial statements arose, including her 1999 acknowledgment that she had "dabbled" in witchcraft. She lost the general election to Democrat Chris Coons.

The federal inquiry by the U.S. attorney's office in Delaware and the FBI was first reported by the Associated Press. But law enforcement sources said it is very preliminary and has not progressed to a full-fledged criminal investigation, as the AP reported. The sources spoke on condition of anonymity because the probe is ongoing.

O'Donnell called the allegations politically motivated and suggested Wednesday that the Obama administration - particularly Vice President Biden, who represented Delaware in the Senate for decades - was behind them.

"Given that the king of the Delaware political establishment just so happens to be the vice president of the most liberal presidential administration in U.S. history, it is no surprise that misuse and abuse of the FBI would not be off the table," she said in a statement.

O'Donnell added: "If anything does materialize from this rumor, we will continue to fully cooperate, as we have made every attempt to ensure we are in compliance with all rules and regulations."

O'Donnell's run was her third attempt for the Senate, and questions persisted this fall about whether, during her 2008 race against Biden, she had used campaign funds to pay for personal expenditures.

Jon Moseley, who ran her primary campaign in 2008 and briefly served as treasurer, said Wednesday that the candidate was "honest to a fault" about her campaign finances and "very cautious about doing the right thing."

But Kristin Murray, a former O'Donnell campaign manager, recorded a robocall to Delaware voters this year alleging that O'Donnell was "living on campaign donations . . . while leaving her workers unpaid and piling up thousands in debt." Murray declined to comment Wednesday.

O'Donnell, who has acknowledged having financial problems, has said she used campaign funds to pay part of the rent on her townhouse because it doubled as her campaign headquarters.

The CREW complaint to federal prosecutors cited an affidavit signed by David Keegan, a former aide to O'Donnell. He said that in 2009, O'Donnell paid two months rent out of her campaign funds, and also used the funds for meals, gas and a bowling outing.

It is unclear if the federal inquiry is examining O'Donnell's 2010 Senate run, earlier campaigns or both.

O'Donnell raised $7.3 million for her campaign this year. She spent $6.4 million and had $925,000 left in the bank in the middle of November, federal reports show.

Melanie Sloan, CREW's executive director, said Wednesday that she welcomed the inquiry. "It's quite clear that O'Donnell was misappropriating money for personal expenses," Sloan said. "My understanding is that she treated the whole thing like her piggy bank."
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting