Author Topic: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .  (Read 6787 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline wabash909

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6346
  • scattered all over like seeds in the wind
    • View Profile
Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
« Reply #25 on: September 29, 2010, 10:41:41 AM »
As annoying as Holthus can be and Harlan before him, these guys are simply at another level in terms of their grasp of the game and their ability to verbally encapsulate the in game action from sequence to sequence.


Honestly i never really pay attention. But i did catch part of the Chiefs game Sunday, and Mitch was damn good at describing what we going on, probably even too much detail. Some people have the gift, others don't.

You can't just fire a guy can you? I mean, GPC would go nuts, im guessing.


Yeah, I don't see a firing on the horizon as much as it should happen.  I think it's mostly a Learfield deal.  

All in all, we were pretty fracking lucky with Holthus and Sharpe during the DOD.  I can honestly say, I never really did appreciate that level of professionalism until having to be subjected to the last 8 years or whatever Wyatt-vision.



  
Texas Christian University coach Gary Patterson has been hired as Kansas State's 34th football coach, multiple sources have confirmed to GoPowercat.com.  Patterson replaces Ron Prince, who was fired Wednesday. - Tim Fitzgerald   Nov, 7, 2008

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45939
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
« Reply #26 on: September 29, 2010, 11:47:13 AM »
06 . . . now one of the goemawtards.



Nothing more  :powerespect: than starting a Stan and/or Wyatt thread.  Most don't give a crap gramps.  It's 2010, we don't gather around the old radio for War of the Worlds.  It was a nationally televised home game.  If you HAD to listen instead of watch you should be analyzing your decision making & why you were in that position instead of what they are saying.

Offline Acceleration Man

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 527
    • View Profile
Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
« Reply #27 on: September 29, 2010, 12:11:17 PM »
Hmm... This turned into a Wyatt thread --

Well, FWIW, I know Stanbot is kinda a homer, but I like it.  :dunno: I like how I can usually tell in the pre-game analysis he does (even though he's homering) how much of a chance he thinks we've got. You just have to kinda read between the lines. And his analysis isn't that bad... it's a whole lot better than any TV commentators (at least as far as being accurate).

Wyatt -- Not the worst guy out there, that's for SURE, but -- at times is very annoying. Especially like for instance on a critical 3rd and 10 he'll be all --

"Coffman down under center ... now drops back, looking to pass... he's in trouble! -- Oh, and a GREAT catch before he's pushed out of bounds!! And that was .... Thompson making the grab....

... but it looks like he's gonna short of the 1st down marker by about 2 yards."

And you can see Stan  :facepalm: and then says, "Yeah, Wyatt, it's going to be 4th down..."

Offline deputy dawg

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4210
  • Wait, wait....what?
    • View Profile
Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
« Reply #28 on: September 29, 2010, 01:57:17 PM »
Do you hear yourselves?  Good gawd, the sewer in flyover country has BOB DAVIS calling their games.  Between whining about every officiating call and homering for the gayhawks, I'm surprised Davis has time to clean his cooter between pee-pees.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59614
    • View Profile
Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
« Reply #29 on: September 29, 2010, 02:15:04 PM »
06 . . . now one of the goemawtards.



Nothing more  :powerespect: than starting a Stan and/or Wyatt thread.  Most don't give a crap gramps.  It's 2010, we don't gather around the old radio for War of the Worlds.  It was a nationally televised home game.  If you HAD to listen instead of watch you should be analyzing your decision making & why you were in that position instead of what they are saying.

You are perpetually on the rag ya little $!#* burp . . . I was at the game, or can't you read and comprehend??  Maybe if I posted using text language you'd understand.




Offline Saulbadguy

  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 9939
  • what
    • View Profile
Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
« Reply #30 on: September 29, 2010, 02:17:14 PM »
06 . . . now one of the goemawtards.



Nothing more  :powerespect: than starting a Stan and/or Wyatt thread.  Most don't give a crap gramps.  It's 2010, we don't gather around the old radio for War of the Worlds.  It was a nationally televised home game.  If you HAD to listen instead of watch you should be analyzing your decision making & why you were in that position instead of what they are saying.

You are perpetually on the rag ya little $!#* burp . . . I was at the game, or can't you read and comprehend??  Maybe if I posted using text language you'd understand.




Were you listening to Stan and Wyatt on the call while you were at the game?
Where did you get that overnight bag?

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59614
    • View Profile
Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
« Reply #31 on: September 29, 2010, 02:21:03 PM »
06 . . . now one of the goemawtards.



Nothing more  :powerespect: than starting a Stan and/or Wyatt thread.  Most don't give a crap gramps.  It's 2010, we don't gather around the old radio for War of the Worlds.  It was a nationally televised home game.  If you HAD to listen instead of watch you should be analyzing your decision making & why you were in that position instead of what they are saying.

You are perpetually on the rag ya little $!#* burp . . . I was at the game, or can't you read and comprehend??  Maybe if I posted using text language you'd understand.




Were you listening to Stan and Wyatt on the call while you were at the game?

http://www.kcconfidential.com/?p=20525#more-20525


Offline mcmwcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5313
  • trips: "MCMW"
    • View Profile
Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
« Reply #32 on: September 29, 2010, 02:56:01 PM »
who is GH?

Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19406
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
« Reply #33 on: September 29, 2010, 02:59:58 PM »
who is GH?

Greg Hall, i think. Used to work at the Star.
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

Offline Skipper44

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7629
    • View Profile
Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
« Reply #34 on: September 29, 2010, 03:15:56 PM »
who is GH?

Greg Hall, i think. Used to work at the Star.

Also, ghost writer for Big Sexy*



*unconfirmed

Offline deputy dawg

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4210
  • Wait, wait....what?
    • View Profile
Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
« Reply #35 on: September 29, 2010, 04:56:45 PM »
I look forward to listening to Stanbot call the games....it sure sucks being a tard.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45939
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
« Reply #36 on: September 29, 2010, 08:19:33 PM »
06 . . . now one of the goemawtards.



Nothing more  :powerespect: than starting a Stan and/or Wyatt thread.  Most don't give a crap gramps.  It's 2010, we don't gather around the old radio for War of the Worlds.  It was a nationally televised home game.  If you HAD to listen instead of watch you should be analyzing your decision making & why you were in that position instead of what they are saying.

You are perpetually on the rag ya little $!#* burp . . . I was at the game, or can't you read and comprehend??  Maybe if I posted using text language you'd understand.





Fantastic rant gramps, $!#* burp huh:cool: doesn't change the fact that you are calling people tards yet you seem to be giving your pacemaker a workout about radio announcers you don't even have to listen to.  You are a much better bb'er when you are obsessing over Mt. Oread or repeating the same straw man argument about a player or coach over and over.

We're cool bro, stop being mad.  :cheers: I want no part of you stroking out.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30948
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
« Reply #37 on: September 29, 2010, 08:35:37 PM »
06 . . . now one of the goemawtards.



Nothing more  :powerespect: than starting a Stan and/or Wyatt thread.  Most don't give a feces gramps.  It's 2010, we don't gather around the old radio for War of the Worlds.  It was a nationally televised home game.  If you HAD to listen instead of watch you should be analyzing your decision making & why you were in that position instead of what they are saying.

You are perpetually on the rag ya little $!#* burp . . . I was at the game, or can't you read and comprehend??  Maybe if I posted using text language you'd understand.





Fantastic rant gramps, $!#* burp huh:cool: doesn't change the fact that you are calling people tards yet you seem to be giving your pacemaker a workout about radio announcers you don't even have to listen to.  You are a much better bb'er when you are obsessing over Mt. Oread or repeating the same straw man argument about a player or coach over and over.

We're cool bro, stop being mad.  :cheers: I want no part of you stroking out.

Glad this got cleared up between you two.  I was all...


Offline nicname

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 17058
  • Deal with it.
    • View Profile
Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
« Reply #38 on: September 29, 2010, 08:37:22 PM »
Mods, please change MIR's screen name to Angry Black and give him this Avatar.  

BTW, MIR I agree with you. Also, listening to the game on headphones while at the game is beyond lame, unless you are EMAW headphone kid.
If there was a gif of nicname thwarting the attempted-flag-taker and then gesturing him to suck it, followed by motioning for all of Hilton Shelter to boo him louder, it'd be better than that auburn gif.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30948
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
« Reply #39 on: September 29, 2010, 08:38:59 PM »
No way Jose.  I'm pretty sure he would whip our asses if we did that.

Offline "storm"nut

  • SOCK (outed by The Laundromat)
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3004
    • View Profile
Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
« Reply #40 on: September 29, 2010, 08:43:54 PM »
No way Jose.  I'm pretty sure he would whip our asses if we did that.

RIP Fatty

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45939
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
« Reply #41 on: September 29, 2010, 08:55:40 PM »
Mods, please change MIR's screen name to Angry Black and give him this Avatar.  

BTW, MIR I agree with you. Also, listening to the game on headphones while at the game is beyond lame, unless you are EMAW headphone kid.

I'm a cool, calculated angry, I'd cut a dude before I let anyone make me look like that brotha.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59614
    • View Profile
Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
« Reply #42 on: September 29, 2010, 09:37:55 PM »
I rant in fewer words than you Rain . . . I am superior in every way.