Author Topic: Depth Chart  (Read 17205 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Depth Chart
« Reply #100 on: September 01, 2010, 12:40:05 PM »
Several good points brought up in this thread.

First, no doubt the depth chart is being used to push Harper a little bit.  No doubt he has some talent, but it could be that he needs to continue to mature.  I think he'll be fine.  Plus, even though he was here last year, once the season started he was likely a scout team guy, so while he was learning wide reciever skills, he wasn't learning our offense.  It wasn't until the spring that he would've been full time in our system, but that's not any different than any transfer/red shirt.  I have to think that starting out at QB at Oregon probably slowed him down a bit as well, but again, I think he'll be fine with time.

I've heard great things about Thompson, similar to Banks, but probably faster and a much more knowledgable about the system and what is expected of him.  He has a chance to be an impact player.

As far as Smith being a return man ahead of Thompson, a lot of times it takes time for younger guys to get the return game figured out.  I imagine before he's done here Thompson will be a very good return guy, but I think Smith will be too.

Offline Paul Moscow

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1844
    • View Profile
Re: Depth Chart
« Reply #101 on: September 01, 2010, 12:49:04 PM »
Several good points brought up in this thread.

First, no doubt the depth chart is being used to push Harper a little bit.  No doubt he has some talent, but it could be that he needs to continue to mature.  I think he'll be fine.  Plus, even though he was here last year, once the season started he was likely a scout team guy, so while he was learning wide reciever skills, he wasn't learning our offense.  It wasn't until the spring that he would've been full time in our system, but that's not any different than any transfer/red shirt.  I have to think that starting out at QB at Oregon probably slowed him down a bit as well, but again, I think he'll be fine with time.

I've heard great things about Thompson, similar to Banks, but probably faster and a much more knowledgable about the system and what is expected of him.  He has a chance to be an impact player.

As far as Smith being a return man ahead of Thompson, a lot of times it takes time for younger guys to get the return game figured out.  I imagine before he's done here Thompson will be a very good return guy, but I think Smith will be too.

No way Thompson is faster than Banks - Thompson even admitted it. He may be quicker and have more agility but he doesn't have the same straight away speed that Banks has.

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: Depth Chart
« Reply #102 on: September 01, 2010, 12:51:44 PM »
Very possible we may have 2 deep on kickoffs.  Saying Tremaine is faster than Banks may be asking a little too much.  Banks was one of the fastest players in college football.  Tramaine does look to have better size than Banks though.  I'm beginning to think some people don't have a real good idea of what the Wildcat formation is.  Simply lining up a RB at QB does not make it the wildcat formation.  You really don't add blocking backs to the formation, it's important that every play looks identical at the line of scrimmage.  The only changes come after the snap in terms of handoffs or possible throws.  And Harper was on the scout team last year but our offense isn't wildly different than any other out there.  We don't ask our WRs to do anything that they wouldn't be doing in any of the offenses the scout squad may attempt to emulate.  Chris should have a good grasp of what he needs to be doing.  If someone else is outplaying him or outworking him...

Offline MadCat

  • TIME's Person Of The Year - 2006
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13890
    • View Profile
Re: Depth Chart
« Reply #103 on: September 01, 2010, 12:56:51 PM »
Very possible we may have 2 deep on kickoffs.  Saying Tremaine is faster than Banks may be asking a little too much.  Banks was one of the fastest players in college football.  Tramaine does look to have better size than Banks though.  I'm beginning to think some people don't have a real good idea of what the Wildcat formation is.  Simply lining up a RB at QB does not make it the wildcat formation.  You really don't add blocking backs to the formation, it's important that every play looks identical at the line of scrimmage.  The only changes come after the snap in terms of handoffs or possible throws.  And Harper was on the scout team last year but our offense isn't wildly different than any other out there.  We don't ask our WRs to do anything that they wouldn't be doing in any of the offenses the scout squad may attempt to emulate.  Chris should have a good grasp of what he needs to be doing.  If someone else is outplaying him or outworking him...

I thought we always had 2 deep on kickoffs.   :dunno:

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37993
    • View Profile
Re: Depth Chart
« Reply #104 on: September 01, 2010, 12:58:02 PM »
I'm beginning to think some people don't have a real good idea of what the Wildcat formation is.  Simply lining up a RB at QB does not make it the wildcat formation.  You really don't add blocking backs to the formation, it's important that every play looks identical at the line of scrimmage.  The only changes come after the snap in terms of handoffs or possible throws.

That's why you create a new package similar to the wildcat that features blocking backs. We have 2 former quarterbacks playing on the offense at different positions. It seems like maybe we would want to take advantage of that.

Offline PoetWarrior

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2353
    • View Profile
Re: Depth Chart
« Reply #105 on: September 01, 2010, 01:00:01 PM »
Wildcat=Running QB in shotgun who is not normally your QB.

Let's leave it at that.

yoga-like_abana

  • Guest
Re: Depth Chart
« Reply #106 on: September 01, 2010, 01:31:28 PM »
Guys I looked over the offensive depth chart again and the only answer I can come up with as to why Harper is so low on the chart is because we have so many more offensive weapons. I think it may have been there idea to cancel the series.

Offline bonercat

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 857
    • View Profile
Re: Depth Chart
« Reply #107 on: September 01, 2010, 01:56:53 PM »
Why is everyone up in arms about Harper not starting again!?
[

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: Depth Chart
« Reply #108 on: September 01, 2010, 02:39:26 PM »
The Wildcat isn't a system, it's a single formation.  Anytime you deviate from it, you're running a different formation.  Sure, we could move all sorts of people around to take adavantage of some of the unique talents we may have.  Putting a running QB in with RBs and FBs in is more like a triple option attack than a wildcat.  Also, the more backs you have in the less WRs you have available for possible passes.  We didn't bring Harper in to play RB, we already have those.  We brought him in to catch passes.  The kid isn't a Percy Harvin type of players.  He's bigger but slower.

Offline Pett

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4250
  • KLI GOD
    • View Profile
Re: Depth Chart
« Reply #109 on: September 01, 2010, 03:24:08 PM »
Should I be concerened with this?:

RT 71 Ethan Douglas (6-6, 300, So.-SQ) OR
75 Clyde Aufner (6-5, 300, Jr.-2L)

I kind of am.




This is actually a very good thing. GoPo reported that Aufner was hurt badly again (re-injured the ankle he messed up during spring ball) and could miss the entire season. I had a little update on kstatriots.com that Clyde's injury wasn't as bad as originally thought. Looks like my source was right on.... :thumbsup:
« Last Edit: September 01, 2010, 03:26:59 PM by Pett »

Offline kstatefreak42

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2911
    • View Profile
Re: Depth Chart
« Reply #110 on: September 01, 2010, 03:24:48 PM »
Cool
EMAW

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37993
    • View Profile
Re: Depth Chart
« Reply #111 on: September 01, 2010, 03:38:46 PM »
The Wildcat isn't a system, it's a single formation.  Anytime you deviate from it, you're running a different formation.  Sure, we could move all sorts of people around to take adavantage of some of the unique talents we may have.  Putting a running QB in with RBs and FBs in is more like a triple option attack than a wildcat.  Also, the more backs you have in the less WRs you have available for possible passes.  We didn't bring Harper in to play RB, we already have those.  We brought him in to catch passes.  The kid isn't a Percy Harvin type of players.  He's bigger but slower.

I don't care if we run the wildcat. I want to see Chris Harper get the ball in space. If he's too shitty of a receiver to do that, then we need to come up with another way to make that happen. Also, when is the last time LHC Bill Snyder had a good offense that didn't feature a running QB with RBs and FBs?

What I would really like to see is the pistol formation with Thomas at QB and Harper at RB. The majority of the time, Thomas would run just as if it were the wildcat formation, but Harper would be a pitch option on any runs to the outside. This formation would still allow 3 WRs for pass plays, also.
« Last Edit: September 01, 2010, 03:42:11 PM by Nuts Kicked »

Offline DILLIGAF

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 179
    • View Profile
Re: Depth Chart
« Reply #112 on: September 01, 2010, 03:42:37 PM »
1991 thru 1996

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37993
    • View Profile
Re: Depth Chart
« Reply #113 on: September 01, 2010, 03:45:06 PM »

Offline wabashcannonball

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 133
    • View Profile
Re: Depth Chart
« Reply #114 on: September 01, 2010, 03:47:03 PM »
I was born in '91  :ksu:

u guys dont need to spread this crap ok

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: Depth Chart
« Reply #115 on: September 01, 2010, 10:45:01 PM »
JFC.  Why would anyone want the ball in the hands of any player that is not the best we have to offer.  If Harper is one of the best options we have, buy God get him the ball.  The spring game and the depth chart says he isn't.  Guess it's a good scapegoat for Saturday, either way.

Offline CrushNasty

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1000
  • Future Shooter Jones W.C.
    • View Profile
Re: Depth Chart
« Reply #116 on: September 01, 2010, 10:49:09 PM »

RB 8 Daniel Thomas (6-2, 228, Sr.-1L)
33 John Hubert (5-7, 185, Fr.-RS)




No Powell?   :dunno:

You didn't read my "nuggets" post did you?  :nono:

Offline CrushNasty

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1000
  • Future Shooter Jones W.C.
    • View Profile
Re: Depth Chart
« Reply #117 on: September 01, 2010, 10:49:55 PM »

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: Depth Chart
« Reply #118 on: September 01, 2010, 10:52:27 PM »
'preciate the love.  I'm not exactly sober here.

Offline 06wildcat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1666
    • View Profile
Re: Depth Chart
« Reply #119 on: September 02, 2010, 01:55:07 AM »
buy God get him the ball. 

 :love:

Nice thought, though Christians have been tithing for centuries and still haven't got him to appear. Meanwhile, we can't even get shitters on the upper deck.

Offline SwiftCat

  • #LIFE
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3618
  • Depth Charge
    • View Profile
Re: Depth Chart
« Reply #120 on: September 07, 2010, 01:01:21 PM »
KO 19 Josh Cherry (6-0, 190, Sr.-3L) OR
10 Anthony Cantele (5-10, 186, So.-SQ)

 :comehere:

I've heard some pretty insidery types saying this Cantele kid can regularly hit from 45+

Also that he can run 4.5 40. can you say fake FG attempt?

Just wanted to point out my sources were money with this one.

Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19406
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: Depth Chart
« Reply #121 on: September 07, 2010, 01:17:07 PM »
KO 19 Josh Cherry (6-0, 190, Sr.-3L) OR
10 Anthony Cantele (5-10, 186, So.-SQ)

 :comehere:

I've heard some pretty insidery types saying this Cantele kid can regularly hit from 45+

Also that he can run 4.5 40. can you say fake FG attempt?

Just wanted to point out my sources were money with this one.

kudos.

Also, the new Depth Chart has been released...
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: Depth Chart
« Reply #122 on: September 07, 2010, 01:20:06 PM »
KO 19 Josh Cherry (6-0, 190, Sr.-3L) OR
10 Anthony Cantele (5-10, 186, So.-SQ)

 :comehere:

I've heard some pretty insidery types saying this Cantele kid can regularly hit from 45+

Also that he can run 4.5 40. can you say fake FG attempt?

Just wanted to point out my sources were money with this one.

kudos.

Also, the new Depth Chart has been released...

http://www.kstatesports.com/auto_pdf/p_hotos/s_chools/ksu/sports/m-footbl/auto_pdf/DepthChart-MOST2

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: Depth Chart
« Reply #123 on: September 07, 2010, 01:22:20 PM »
KO 19 Josh Cherry (6-0, 190, Sr.-3L) OR
10 Anthony Cantele (5-10, 186, So.-SQ)

 :comehere:

I've heard some pretty insidery types saying this Cantele kid can regularly hit from 45+

Also that he can run 4.5 40. can you say fake FG attempt?

Just wanted to point out my sources were money with this one.

How bad would it suck to be Josh Cherry?   A senior who gets his position taken by a walk-on sophomore?  Guess it's nice that we're upgrading talent.

Offline MadCat

  • TIME's Person Of The Year - 2006
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13890
    • View Profile
Re: Depth Chart
« Reply #124 on: September 07, 2010, 01:57:31 PM »
Powell & Quarles on Kickoff Returns.