Author Topic: CHIEFS (Read 2173341 times)

Cartierfor3 · « **Reply #3750 on:** October 22, 2013, 02:14:51 PM »

Quote from: CFoD on October 22, 2013, 01:11:54 PM

Who from this board writes for Yahoo Sports?

CF3?

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/shutdown-corner-nfl-power-rankings-where-does-nfl-050709533--nfl.html

Quote
6. Kansas City Chiefs (7-0, LW: 5)
This might be too high, because among AFC contenders ranked lower I think New England or Cincinnati would beat them on a neutral field. But they deserve this spot because of their record, no matter the strength of schedule.

Which of those 5 ranked ahead of us are we better than? You're complaining about a ranking that has us ahead of New England and San Fran?

mocat · « **Reply #3751 on:** October 22, 2013, 02:23:02 PM »

did you guys see my power rankings? wow, pretty spot on IMO

Cartierfor3 · « **Reply #3752 on:** October 22, 2013, 02:24:25 PM »

Quote from: mocat on October 22, 2013, 02:23:02 PM

did you guys see my power rankings? wow, pretty spot on IMO

You're pretty good at power rankings mocat.

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #3753 on:** October 22, 2013, 02:40:35 PM »

Quote from: mocat on October 22, 2013, 02:23:02 PM

did you guys see my power rankings? wow, pretty spot on IMO

Would the Chiefs be #1 in your power rankings if Reid would have just scored a touchdown at the end of the game against Houston instead of taking a knee?

mocat · « **Reply #3754 on:** October 22, 2013, 02:44:47 PM »

nope still 2nd.

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #3755 on:** October 22, 2013, 02:45:35 PM »

Quote from: mocat on October 22, 2013, 02:44:47 PM

nope still 2nd.

Even if they had gone for 2 and made it?

Institutional Control · « **Reply #3756 on:** October 22, 2013, 05:25:43 PM »

Quote from: CartierFor3 on October 22, 2013, 02:14:51 PM

Quote from: CFoD on October 22, 2013, 01:11:54 PM
Who from this board writes for Yahoo Sports?

CF3?

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/shutdown-corner-nfl-power-rankings-where-does-nfl-050709533--nfl.html

Quote
6. Kansas City Chiefs (7-0, LW: 5)
This might be too high, because among AFC contenders ranked lower I think New England or Cincinnati would beat them on a neutral field. But they deserve this spot because of their record, no matter the strength of schedule.

Which of those 5 ranked ahead of us are we better than? You're complaining about a ranking that has us ahead of New England and San Fran?

I think I could make an argument we could beat any of those teams on a neutral field.

Dub · « **Reply #3757 on:** October 22, 2013, 07:26:21 PM »

Pendergast · « **Reply #3758 on:** October 22, 2013, 07:54:54 PM »

Quote from: CartierFor3 on October 22, 2013, 02:14:51 PM

Quote from: CFoD on October 22, 2013, 01:11:54 PM
Who from this board writes for Yahoo Sports?

CF3?

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/shutdown-corner-nfl-power-rankings-where-does-nfl-050709533--nfl.html

Quote
6. Kansas City Chiefs (7-0, LW: 5)
This might be too high, because among AFC contenders ranked lower I think New England or Cincinnati would beat them on a neutral field. But they deserve this spot because of their record, no matter the strength of schedule.

Which of those 5 ranked ahead of us are we better than? You're complaining about a ranking that has us ahead of New England and San Fran?

All of them. Records exist for a reason.

Cartierfor3 · « **Reply #3759 on:** October 22, 2013, 08:59:15 PM »

Quote from: CFoD on October 22, 2013, 05:25:43 PM

Quote from: CartierFor3 on October 22, 2013, 02:14:51 PM
Quote from: CFoD on October 22, 2013, 01:11:54 PM
Who from this board writes for Yahoo Sports?

CF3?

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/shutdown-corner-nfl-power-rankings-where-does-nfl-050709533--nfl.html

Quote
6. Kansas City Chiefs (7-0, LW: 5)
This might be too high, because among AFC contenders ranked lower I think New England or Cincinnati would beat them on a neutral field. But they deserve this spot because of their record, no matter the strength of schedule.

Which of those 5 ranked ahead of us are we better than? You're complaining about a ranking that has us ahead of New England and San Fran?

I think I could make an argument we could beat any of those teams on a neutral field.

Of course we're capable of that, but if that fictitious neutral field game happened, all 5 of those would be favored over us.

star seed 7 · « **Reply #3760 on:** October 22, 2013, 09:15:56 PM »

That's why they play the games CF3.

Cartierfor3 · « **Reply #3761 on:** October 22, 2013, 09:34:13 PM »

Quote from: seven on October 22, 2013, 09:15:56 PM

That's why they play the games CF3.

PowercatPat · « **Reply #3762 on:** October 22, 2013, 09:43:26 PM »

Quote from: CFoD on October 22, 2013, 05:25:43 PM

Quote from: CartierFor3 on October 22, 2013, 02:14:51 PM
Quote from: CFoD on October 22, 2013, 01:11:54 PM
Who from this board writes for Yahoo Sports?

CF3?

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/shutdown-corner-nfl-power-rankings-where-does-nfl-050709533--nfl.html

Quote
6. Kansas City Chiefs (7-0, LW: 5)
This might be too high, because among AFC contenders ranked lower I think New England or Cincinnati would beat them on a neutral field. But they deserve this spot because of their record, no matter the strength of schedule.

Which of those 5 ranked ahead of us are we better than? You're complaining about a ranking that has us ahead of New England and San Fran?

I think I could make an argument we could beat any of those teams on a neutral field.

Yeah especially New England. They just aren't that good this year. We are far more talented at almost every position except QB.

I think we would beat them pretty easily on a neutral site.

yoga-like_abana · « **Reply #3763 on:** October 22, 2013, 10:24:48 PM »

How can anyone take a guys opinion on sports serious when he looks like that. (not trying to mean but also sorry I'm not sorry)

star seed 7 · « **Reply #3764 on:** October 22, 2013, 10:30:47 PM »

tamba leaving a 1k tip on a $1600 bill? what a saint!

star seed 7 · « **Reply #3765 on:** October 23, 2013, 12:16:09 AM »

Station got some really BADASS Chiefs coasters. Best coasters I've ever seen, and I've seen a lot.

bones129 · « **Reply #3766 on:** October 23, 2013, 12:22:24 AM »

Coasters make it all good.

SkinnyBenny · « **Reply #3767 on:** October 23, 2013, 11:29:48 AM »

Coaster pics?

Winters · « **Reply #3768 on:** October 23, 2013, 12:33:03 PM »

star seed 7 · « **Reply #3769 on:** October 23, 2013, 12:40:07 PM »

Quote from: SkinnyBenny on October 23, 2013, 11:29:48 AM

Coaster pics?

Will do on red Friday (maybe red Thursday).

WillieWatanabe · « **Reply #3770 on:** October 23, 2013, 12:49:07 PM »

my god i love the Chiefs-o picture stuff ive been seeing on facebook lately.

wetwillie · « **Reply #3771 on:** October 23, 2013, 04:59:03 PM »

If we beat Cleveland at home and go on the road and beat buffalo I might get a raging chiefs boner that I should call a medical professional about.

mocat · « **Reply #3772 on:** October 23, 2013, 06:18:47 PM »

If we go 9-0 then 13-3 and have a bye week before a home playoff game, would you rather face Peyton or the Colts or the field?

wetwillie · « **Reply #3773 on:** October 23, 2013, 06:29:51 PM »

Quote from: mocat on October 23, 2013, 06:18:47 PM

If we go 9-0 then 13-3 and have a bye week before a home playoff game, would you rather face Peyton or the Colts or the field?

Peyton

Winters · « **Reply #3774 on:** October 23, 2013, 06:31:37 PM »

Quote from: mocat on October 23, 2013, 06:18:47 PM

If we go 9-0 then 13-3 and have a bye week before a home playoff game, would you rather face Peyton or the Colts or the field?

the field