CHIEFS

[PandaXpanda]

I am a fan of Kim Carnes but this is out of control

Not completely out of control. Freeman has a cannon, which is step one to making it to greatness.

[j-dub]

I am a fan of Kim Carnes but this is out of control

same. also, kim, a 1st rounder? really?

tweet from this evening "ESPN's Chris Mortensen on Josh Freeman's trade value: "They would probably take anything for him at this point."

['taterblast]

i would absolutely take freeman for the chiefs.

having said that, i still want the chiefs to draft their own franchise quarter back ASAP, so it might conflict a little bit.

[420seriouscat69]

Carnes fantasy team:

QB: Freeman
RB: Bryce Brown

Results: Pick, fumble, fumble, pick, fumble, pick.

Rinse and repeat...

[mocat]

I'm going to enjoy 3-0 on Sunday morning at 7:30 am (that's when the gates open). It's going to be in the 40's and sunny, warming up to the mid 70's. I'm going to get fairly pak'd on doses of mimosas and you losers can argue about how the quarterback of the franchise is not a franchise quarterback.

[8manpick]

I'm going to enjoy 3-0 on Sunday morning at 7:30 am (that's when the gates open). It's going to be in the 40's and sunny, warming up to the mid 70's. I'm going to get fairly pak'd on doses of mimosas and you losers can argue about how the quarterback of the franchise is not a franchise quarterback.

Champagne and cocaine?

[8manpick]

Carnes fantasy team:

QB: Freeman
RB: Bryce Brown

Results: Pick, fumble, fumble, pick, fumble, pick.

Rinse and repeat...

FWIW, at that point in their careers, Smith had a similar, if not worse INT rate than Freeman, and Charles had a similar fumble rate to Brown.

[mocat]

I'm going to enjoy 3-0 on Sunday morning at 7:30 am (that's when the gates open). It's going to be in the 40's and sunny, warming up to the mid 70's. I'm going to get fairly pak'd on doses of mimosas and you losers can argue about how the quarterback of the franchise is not a franchise quarterback.

Champagne and cocaine?

oh yeah i hate you too 

[Institutional Control]

I like the new thread title.

[mocat]

Everybody post your parking lot locales tomorrow morning!

[Cire]

I effing hate the "chiefs kingdom" moniker

[_33]

I effing hate the "chiefs kingdom" moniker

I accidentally listened to part of the "Chiefs Kingdom" radio show earlier this year and my goodness it was just awful.  Like embarrassingly bad.  Do all NFL teams have terrible live shows with a crowd like that or is it unique to the Chiefs?

[mocat]

N46

[lopakman]

4-0 guys, I can feel it.   

[Lucas Scoopsalot]

I think the Chiefs are a blessing to us Cat fans this year. The Cats are bad so the Chiefs have given us something to believe in. 

[Pett]

No Flowers today. Going to be hard to stop Cruz/Nicks

[ChiComCat]

No Flowers today. Going to be hard to stop Cruz/Hicks

Pass rush will stop Cruz/Hicks :crossesfingers:

[Pete]

So, if we win this today to get to 4-0, I was thinking that we are set, but here are the numbers for teams that went 4-0

A 4-0 team would seem to have established that it will win more than it will lose. But in the prior 24 NFL seasons, the 69 teams to start 4-0 averaged 11.3 wins on the season, according to Neil Paine of Sports Reference. That means they won an average of 7.3 more games while losing an average of 4.7 games, equivalent to winning a mere 60.8% of their games. Moreover, there was a lot of variation behind that average: One-third of the 4-0 teams won 50% or fewer of their remaining games, finishing with 10 or fewer wins. So a team that’s started 4-0 has given some indication that it’s better than average, but not much, and it’s far from a guarantee — only two-thirds of teams have been better than average over the rest of the season.

http://blogs.wsj.com/dailyfix/2012/10/04/nfl-2012-4-0-undefeated-arizona-cardinals/


I will still take.

[ChiComCat]

So, if we win this today to get to 4-0, I was thinking that we are set, but here are the numbers for teams that went 4-0

A 4-0 team would seem to have established that it will win more than it will lose. But in the prior 24 NFL seasons, the 69 teams to start 4-0 averaged 11.3 wins on the season, according to Neil Paine of Sports Reference. That means they won an average of 7.3 more games while losing an average of 4.7 games, equivalent to winning a mere 60.8% of their games. Moreover, there was a lot of variation behind that average: One-third of the 4-0 teams won 50% or fewer of their remaining games, finishing with 10 or fewer wins. So a team that’s started 4-0 has given some indication that it’s better than average, but not much, and it’s far from a guarantee — only two-thirds of teams have been better than average over the rest of the season.

http://blogs.wsj.com/dailyfix/2012/10/04/nfl-2012-4-0-undefeated-arizona-cardinals/


I will still take.

Not surprising considering how rare even 12 wins has become.  4-0 means we can go .500 the rest of the season and still probably make the playoffs.    Pretty nice cushion

[Pete]

It's going to be really hard to make Eli Manning be 0-4, though. 

[Pete]

This D is rough ridin' filthy in pass rush.  Just awesome.

[_33]

Dexter McCluster has to be the worst return man in the NFL.

[420seriouscat69]

This defense is badass and fun to watch.

[_33]

Dexter McCluster has to be the worst return man in the NFL.

jk

[joda]

Dexter McCluster has to be the worst return man in the NFL.

jk