Author Topic: CHIEFS  (Read 1501579 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1075 on: April 10, 2012, 11:26:19 AM »
Oh, man would it be awesome talking to the Chiefs fans who said "signing Peyton Manning is mortgaging the future" after the Chiefs draft Tannehill.

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1076 on: April 10, 2012, 11:35:13 AM »
I really doubt that KC is interested in Tannehill.  A sketchy first round quarterback is exactly the opposite of Scott Peoli.
yeah where will some crappy defensive LSU player go if the Chiefs don't draft em.
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline Winters

  • The King of Real Zeal
  • Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *********
  • Posts: 16044
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1077 on: April 17, 2012, 06:45:31 PM »
Monday night game vs. Steelers  :D
Best #heel and/or #babyface on this blogsite



If it were up to me, Wintz would be on a fan scholarship, full ride.

Offline PowercatPat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4427
  • #BID
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1078 on: April 17, 2012, 07:40:53 PM »
Tannehill sucks. Would rather have Russell Wilson or Weeden.

Offline joda

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3757
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1079 on: April 17, 2012, 11:14:56 PM »
Tannehill sucks. Would rather have Russell Wilson or Weeden.

Right now my ideal draft scenario for the Chiefs would be to take DeCasto at 11 and Weeden in the 2nd.

Offline Jackie Moon

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 92
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1080 on: April 17, 2012, 11:37:13 PM »
Tannehill sucks. Would rather have Russell Wilson or Weeden.

Right now my ideal draft scenario for the Chiefs would be to take DeCasto at 11 and Weeden in the 2nd.

Would not be against this. Still need to address the nose tackle though. Anyone out there in free agency?

Offline AbeFroman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8330
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1081 on: April 18, 2012, 12:28:22 AM »
Hearing more and more reports that the Chiefs interested in Ryan Tannehill at #11 if he's still there. Thoughts?

pfffffft

If the Chiefs draft him I will  :lol: forever. Taking a 3rd round (at best) QB with the 11th pick. That is so Chiefy

As for the schedule I count 12 losses. Should be a fun season of watching Chiefs fans try and figure out why they suck again
« Last Edit: April 18, 2012, 12:33:54 AM by AbeFroman »

Offline joda

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3757
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1082 on: April 18, 2012, 01:03:44 AM »
Tannehill sucks. Would rather have Russell Wilson or Weeden.

Right now my ideal draft scenario for the Chiefs would be to take DeCasto at 11 and Weeden in the 2nd.

Would not be against this. Still need to address the nose tackle though. Anyone out there in free agency?

Don't know, just hope they don't take Poe. He has bust written all over him. I'd rather they gamble on the Jean-Baptiste kid from Baylor.

Offline PowercatPat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4427
  • #BID
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1083 on: April 18, 2012, 08:53:49 AM »
Tannehill sucks. Would rather have Russell Wilson or Weeden.

Right now my ideal draft scenario for the Chiefs would be to take DeCasto at 11 and Weeden in the 2nd.

Would not be against this. Still need to address the nose tackle though. Anyone out there in free agency?

Don't know, just hope they don't take Poe. He has bust written all over him. I'd rather they gamble on the Jean-Baptiste kid from Baylor.

Poe has potential and he is athletic. At 346 lbs, he ran a 4.87 forty and ran a 1.7 10-yard split. That's pretty impressive for his size.

Offline joda

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3757
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1084 on: April 18, 2012, 12:06:15 PM »
Tannehill sucks. Would rather have Russell Wilson or Weeden.

Right now my ideal draft scenario for the Chiefs would be to take DeCasto at 11 and Weeden in the 2nd.

Would not be against this. Still need to address the nose tackle though. Anyone out there in free agency?

Don't know, just hope they don't take Poe. He has bust written all over him. I'd rather they gamble on the Jean-Baptiste kid from Baylor.

Poe has potential and he is athletic. At 346 lbs, he ran a 4.87 forty and ran a 1.7 10-yard split. That's pretty impressive for his size.

And he did absolutely nothing in the CUSA. There's plenty of athletic D-lineman who have failed in the NFL (remember the guy who jumped out of a swimming pool a few years back?). It's impressive, but most of the time the impressive combine numbers+poor production=bust

Offline Jackie Moon

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 92
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1085 on: April 18, 2012, 01:04:42 PM »
I agree that Poe has the possibility of a bust, but this draft seems to have a decent amount of good nose tackles. Would like to see us address this position in the 2nd round.

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17593
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1086 on: April 20, 2012, 04:57:29 PM »
Tannehill sucks. Would rather have Russell Wilson or Weeden.

Right now my ideal draft scenario for the Chiefs would be to take DeCasto at 11 and Weeden in the 2nd.

Would not be against this. Still need to address the nose tackle though. Anyone out there in free agency?

Don't know, just hope they don't take Poe. He has bust written all over him. I'd rather they gamble on the Jean-Baptiste kid from Baylor.

Poe has potential and he is athletic. At 346 lbs, he ran a 4.87 forty and ran a 1.7 10-yard split. That's pretty impressive for his size.

And he did absolutely nothing in the CUSA. There's plenty of athletic D-lineman who have failed in the NFL (remember the guy who jumped out of a swimming pool a few years back?). It's impressive, but most of the time the impressive combine numbers+poor production=bust

I don't think its a stretch to think that he was poorly coached at Memphis and the scheme didn't fit.  DT is one of the positions that relies most on those things.  I would be happy if the Chiefs took him.  I like his up side and think Romeo will be able to get the most out of him.  A dominant DT is key to a 3-4 and maybe the toughest position to fill in all of football.

Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17145
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1087 on: April 21, 2012, 01:43:02 PM »
It looks like Miami is planning on drafting Tannehill.

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17593
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1088 on: April 22, 2012, 09:17:31 AM »
It looks like Miami is planning on drafting Tannehill.

Somebody should tell them he isn't very good

Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17145
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1089 on: April 22, 2012, 09:20:23 AM »
It looks like Miami is planning on drafting Tannehill.

Somebody should tell them he isn't very good

Chiefs fans better not. It could save them from making a really bad 1st round draft pick.

Offline Winters

  • The King of Real Zeal
  • Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *********
  • Posts: 16044
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1090 on: April 26, 2012, 11:13:47 AM »
Lets hope for Kuechley or DeCastro  :driving:
Best #heel and/or #babyface on this blogsite



If it were up to me, Wintz would be on a fan scholarship, full ride.

Offline joda

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3757
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1091 on: April 26, 2012, 11:37:13 AM »
Lets hope for Kuechley or DeCastro  :driving:

 :crossfingers: my top 2 choices also, not true needs for the team, but most likely to be impact players at their positions

Offline AppleJack

  • AppleJack
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6337
  • How are you doing today?
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1092 on: April 26, 2012, 11:48:20 AM »
Give me Hightower.
When one person, for whatever reason, has a chance to lead an exceptional life, he has no right to keep it to himself.

Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17145
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1093 on: April 26, 2012, 05:46:52 PM »
DeCastro.

Offline SabiNation

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2089
  • USA Handball - Rio 2016
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1094 on: April 26, 2012, 07:09:44 PM »
Mark Barron!    :crossfingers:
"If i worked for the NY times, and my boss told me 'hey. if you keep ranking ksu so high, we may fire you' i would tell my boss to 'bring it on.'"  -FFF

Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19427
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1095 on: April 26, 2012, 07:09:54 PM »
and with the 11th pick of the NFL Draft the Chiefs select Ryan Tannehill...

:lol:

Offline PowercatPat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4427
  • #BID
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1096 on: April 26, 2012, 07:36:04 PM »
and with the 11th pick of the NFL Draft the Chiefs select Ryan Tannehill...

:lol:

I think Miami will take him at number 8.

Offline kitten_mittons

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 4587
  • Clawing at your furnitures.
    • View Profile
Re: Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1097 on: April 26, 2012, 07:46:22 PM »
and with the 11th pick of the NFL Draft the Chiefs select Ryan Tannehill...

:lol:

I think Miami will take him at number 8.
You better hope so.

Sent from my Kindle Fire using Tapatalk 2

Offline kitten_mittons

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 4587
  • Clawing at your furnitures.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1098 on: April 26, 2012, 07:50:50 PM »
You dodged a bullet, there.

Sent from my Kindle Fire using Tapatalk 2

Offline AppleJack

  • AppleJack
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6337
  • How are you doing today?
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1099 on: April 26, 2012, 08:09:15 PM »
rough ridin' awful  :flush:
When one person, for whatever reason, has a chance to lead an exceptional life, he has no right to keep it to himself.