Author Topic: CHIEFS  (Read 2049655 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26325 on: January 27, 2025, 10:40:52 AM »
the eagles present a tremendous challenge, and it’s not one to be taken lightly

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20612
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26326 on: January 27, 2025, 11:09:04 AM »
NFC was garbage.

Offline SkinnyBenny

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16746
  • good time rock-n-roll plastic banana FM type
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26327 on: January 27, 2025, 11:23:38 AM »
If anyone gets a ticket hookup and decides not to go, holler at ya boi SB
"walking around mhk and crying in the rain because of love lost is the absolute purest and best thing in the world.  i hope i fall in love during the next few weeks and get my heart broken and it starts raining just to experience it one last time."   --Dlew12

Offline wELLsculptedbrows

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 678
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26328 on: January 27, 2025, 11:34:24 AM »
the eagles present a tremendous challenge, and it’s not one to be taken lightly

Are we looking at the possibility of multiple backbreakers in this game?

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27688
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26329 on: January 27, 2025, 11:54:04 AM »
If anyone gets a ticket hookup and decides not to go, holler at ya boi SB

I promise if I get a free Super Bowl ticket and decide not to attend, to give you the ticket.

Online mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40449
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26330 on: January 27, 2025, 12:17:22 PM »
mocat who do you think gets the most targets tomorrow? then predict 2nd most and 3rd most. more carries for Isaiah or Kareem?

the chiefs have now played 4 real games since hollywood brown came back (vs houston, @ pittsburgh, vs houston, vs buffalo)

the average targets over those 4 games is absolutely perfect, no notes:

xavier 8.3
kelce 7.5
hollywood 5.5
d-hop 2.8
juju 1.8
perine 1.8
gray 1.3
kareem 1.3
pacheco 1.3
watson 0.8

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27688
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26331 on: January 27, 2025, 12:39:20 PM »
The Watson 2 pt play was an all timer

Offline Sandstone Outcropping

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10857
  • a punk who rarely ever took advice
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26332 on: January 27, 2025, 03:24:18 PM »
Which coaching hires in any sport over the past 20 years would you rank ahead of Andy Reid?

Offline Skipper44

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7629
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26333 on: January 27, 2025, 03:43:30 PM »
Which coaching hires in any sport over the past 20 years would you rank ahead of Andy Reid?
Saban was hired in 2007

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67276
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26334 on: January 27, 2025, 03:57:57 PM »
Minor leagues don't count lmfao
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59250
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26335 on: January 27, 2025, 04:03:34 PM »
The only thing that stopped the Chiefs offense yesterday was the Chiefs.

The fumble in the first half and far too conservative play calling in the 3rd quarter.  Otherwise, the Bills did not stop them.


Offline DaBigTrain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12691
  • stuxnet, meltdown, spectre, Bitcoin, ffChamp
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26336 on: January 27, 2025, 04:23:04 PM »
I think we roll the Eagles in our annual spring game classic tbh.
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"

https://blockstream.info/block/000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47909
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26337 on: January 27, 2025, 09:55:53 PM »


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67276
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26338 on: January 27, 2025, 10:02:14 PM »
BITB
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67276
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26339 on: January 27, 2025, 10:11:30 PM »
https://x.com/ClayWendler/status/1883761735477453160

This has been one of my favorite series over the last few years. Other team's radio is so awful and all the huds are so god damn hudsy.
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline SkinnyBenny

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16746
  • good time rock-n-roll plastic banana FM type
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26340 on: January 28, 2025, 11:53:27 AM »

Superdome was lit up Chiefs colors last night bros, we’ve got this in the bag. And when they light it up green tonight I will ignore it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"walking around mhk and crying in the rain because of love lost is the absolute purest and best thing in the world.  i hope i fall in love during the next few weeks and get my heart broken and it starts raining just to experience it one last time."   --Dlew12

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67276
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26341 on: January 28, 2025, 12:13:14 PM »
Ratings are coming in around 60 million. America's team.
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32443
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26342 on: January 28, 2025, 12:30:54 PM »
Is that normal? That seems like an astronomical number.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67276
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26343 on: January 28, 2025, 12:32:02 PM »
Highest since TV had 3 channels and a knob tuner
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline WildcatNkilt

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7002
  • Had the worst birthday ever on Dec. 5th of '98.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26344 on: January 28, 2025, 03:49:50 PM »
Yea since like 1988 or something. 

Last year's Super Bowl had record 123.4 million viewers.  This AFC Championship being 50% of that is amazing.  We are America's team (for the lovers and the haters). 
Kansas City Blue Barbecue fan.

Offline IPA4Me

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7218
  • El Guapo
    • View Profile
    • Life Advice
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26345 on: January 29, 2025, 07:02:03 AM »
Hate watching. America's favorite pastime.

Online mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40449
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26346 on: January 30, 2025, 12:11:13 PM »
went to look at past SB betting lines

LIV
kansas city -1.5 vs san francisco
o/u = 53
result: favorite won & covered, game went under (51)

LV
kansas city -3 vs tampa bay
o/u = 55
result: underdog won & covered, game went under (40)

LVI
la rams -4.5 vs cincinnati
o/u = 48.5
result: favorite won, underdog covered, game went under (43)

LVII
philadelphia -1.5 vs kansas city
o/u = 51.5
result: underdog won & covered, game went over (73)

LVIII
san francisco -2.5 vs kansas city
o/u = 46.5
result: underdog won & covered, game went over (47)

LIX
kansas city -1.5 vs philadelphia
o/u = 48.5
result: ???

Online mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40449
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26347 on: January 30, 2025, 12:25:07 PM »
snowbrag predictos for those same super bowls

LIV
#2 kansas city 25
#1 san francisco 25

result:
kansas city 31
san francisco 20

LV
#2 kansas city 25
#1 tampa bay 27

result:
kansas city 9
tampa bay 31

LVI
#10 cincinnati 23
#1 la rams 26

result:
cincinnati 20
la rams 23

LVII
#1 kansas city 25
#5 philadelphia 25

result:
kansas city 38
philadelphia 35

LVIII
#2 kansas city 21
#3 san francisco 23

result (OT):
kansas city 25
san francisco 22

LIX
#4 kansas city 22
#3 philadelphia 23

result: ???

Offline Justwin

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1140
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26348 on: January 30, 2025, 12:53:48 PM »
Does snowbrag include Week 18 games in its data?

Online mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40449
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26349 on: January 30, 2025, 01:07:25 PM »
Does snowbrag include Week 18 games in its data?

yes. haven't figured out the best way to handle that. normally not that big of a deal but 38-0 is definitely having an impact.