Author Topic: CHIEFS  (Read 2116376 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26150 on: January 18, 2025, 05:42:11 PM »
Buck and aikman are playing a little fast and loose with their commentary

Online mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40534
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26151 on: January 18, 2025, 05:43:47 PM »
That was a back breaking drive
That drive took them from down by 1 score to down by 1 score

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26152 on: January 18, 2025, 05:55:05 PM »
Keep em coming mo

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32511
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26153 on: January 18, 2025, 06:23:23 PM »
Easy two score W.  Bring on Baltimore.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67437
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26154 on: January 18, 2025, 06:30:01 PM »
i like demeo and stroud, pretty good little team they have going.
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15571
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26155 on: January 18, 2025, 06:35:08 PM »
Was the spread 9?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Online mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40534
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26156 on: January 18, 2025, 06:37:07 PM »
Houston never had the lead in that game, but they should hang a banner for winning the back breaking drives competition

Online mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40534
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26157 on: January 18, 2025, 06:38:38 PM »
Was the spread 9?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I think it was -8.5 all week but jumped to -9.5 late. Crazy bad beat for folks who for some reason got the chiefs at -9.5

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26158 on: January 18, 2025, 06:48:23 PM »
That was a helluva game

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47951
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26159 on: January 18, 2025, 07:09:46 PM »
i cannot believe that we’re heading to another conference championship game (at home).  this has to be the single greatest run in any sport ever in the history of sports


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline _33

  • The Inventor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10540
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26160 on: January 18, 2025, 07:18:50 PM »
NFL Twitter is not handling this well. I’ve never seen anything like it.

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 22867
  • Gentleman | Polymath | Renowned Lover
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26161 on: January 18, 2025, 07:19:38 PM »
i cannot believe that we’re heading to another conference championship game (at home).  this has to be the single greatest run in any sport ever in the history of sports

I was just thinking the same thing.
My winning smile and can-do attitude.

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32511
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26162 on: January 18, 2025, 07:27:22 PM »
i cannot believe that we’re heading to another conference championship game (at home).  this has to be the single greatest run in any sport ever in the history of sports

How long do you think it will last? Seems like Mahomes has another 6-7 good seasons left in him. I don't know if Andy has that many left.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline ben ji

  • Senior Moderator
  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 12300
  • Alot of people dont hit on an 18
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26163 on: January 18, 2025, 08:09:18 PM »
Was the spread 9?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I think it was -8.5 all week but jumped to -9.5 late. Crazy bad beat for folks who for some reason got the chiefs at -9.5
I put an Alexander Hamilton on the Texans right before the game at +9.5....I was feeling pretty confident most of the game, then "oh well chefs still won", then "OMG LOL" when the punter ran out of the endzone.

Online mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40534
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26164 on: January 18, 2025, 08:55:26 PM »
NFL Twitter is not handling this well. I’ve never seen anything like it.

There were a couple egregious calls that went the chiefs' way

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67437
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26165 on: January 18, 2025, 09:00:22 PM »
Pretty weak, yeah.
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26166 on: January 18, 2025, 09:40:52 PM »
What calls

Offline ben ji

  • Senior Moderator
  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 12300
  • Alot of people dont hit on an 18
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26167 on: January 18, 2025, 09:48:05 PM »
Feels good to be America's team getting all the calls.

Offline CHONGS

  • The Producer
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20117
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26168 on: January 18, 2025, 10:19:42 PM »
Big game next week.  Big game.

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67437
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26169 on: January 18, 2025, 10:29:22 PM »
Big game next week.  Big game.

must win
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Online mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40534
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26170 on: January 19, 2025, 08:49:19 AM »
The entire nfc north crashing out before the championship game is a surprise

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27689
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26171 on: January 19, 2025, 11:17:19 AM »
NFL Twitter is not handling this well. I’ve never seen anything like it.

There were a couple egregious calls that went the chiefs' way

There were 2 50/50 calls in the game. A roughing the passer, and a catch on the sideline. Each team got one. The one where Pat is sliding is a penalty all day despite that baby Aikman crying.

Maybe cover Kelce, make a FG, don't give up 8 sacks, and don't lead with your helmet.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27689
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26172 on: January 19, 2025, 11:21:32 AM »
Also when you have multiple players and the coach saying "We knew it was us against everyone coming it" you've already lost. Chiefs are poised and focused in big moments. The rest of the NFL can't handle pressure.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26173 on: January 19, 2025, 11:35:04 AM »
NFL Twitter is not handling this well. I’ve never seen anything like it.

There were a couple egregious calls that went the chiefs' way

There were 2 50/50 calls in the game. A roughing the passer, and a catch on the sideline. Each team got one. The one where Pat is sliding is a penalty all day despite that baby Aikman crying.

Maybe cover Kelce, make a FG, don't give up 8 sacks, and don't lead with your helmet.

The roughing the passer call was fine.  The second penalty, which I believe was unnecessary roughness was more borderline bc of how long he waited to go down.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27689
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26174 on: January 19, 2025, 11:38:53 AM »
After the Kelce TD, the Chiefs should've gone for 2. I'm worried Andy's cute red zone scheme or lack of aggression on 4th, or not knowing when to go for 2 could bite us this round.