Author Topic: CHIEFS  (Read 2128063 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline CHONGS

  • The Producer
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20117
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26000 on: December 21, 2024, 04:09:55 PM »
Must win today?

I just wanted to point out how much of a CHONGS post this CHONGS post is
They did it!

Offline Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15573
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26001 on: December 25, 2024, 11:52:03 AM »
Welp, my in-laws WiFi is already struggling with this stream.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67452
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26002 on: December 25, 2024, 02:57:45 PM »
 :driving:
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40535
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26003 on: December 25, 2024, 04:14:55 PM »
I don't think Mahomes will sit until the #1 seed is locked.
I think he will absolutely sit this weekend. If they lose, he'll play on Christmas. If they win, why start him?
They gambled and won big time. Mahomes now gets like 24/25 days off?

Offline Sandstone Outcropping

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11043
  • a punk who rarely ever took advice
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26004 on: December 26, 2024, 11:36:58 AM »

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40535
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26005 on: January 02, 2025, 03:34:28 PM »
chiefs pass rate under reid/mahomes

2018: 61.1% (11th)
2019: 61.6% (10th)
2020: 61.9% (10th)
2021: 62.0% (5th)
2022: 61.9% (7th)
2023: 61.4% (6th)
2024: 58.5% (12th)

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40535
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26006 on: January 02, 2025, 04:17:14 PM »
updated snowbrag heading into week 18

super bowl quality
1 baltimore
2 green bay
3 kansas city
4 detroit
5 buffalo
6 philadelphia
7 minnesota

good
8 tampa bay
9 la chargers
10 seattle
11 denver
12 pittsburgh
13 la rams

ok
14 san francisco
15 houston
16 arizona
17 washington
18 atlanta

not good
19 cincinnati
20 miami
21 indianapolis
22 ny jets
23 dallas
24 las vegas

very bad
25 chicago
26 new orleans
27 tennessee
28 cleveland
29 ny giants
30 jacksonville

extremely bad
31 carolina
32 new england

Offline Justwin

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1145
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26007 on: January 03, 2025, 12:45:41 PM »
I'm more worried about hopefully having Jaylen Watson back at some point in the playoffs.

I don't think he's coming back from a broken ankle this season.

https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/chiefs-designate-cb-jaylen-watson-to-return-from-ir

Obviously nothing guaranteed, but they're telling me there's a chance.

Offline Stupid Fitz

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6844
  • Go Cats
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26008 on: January 03, 2025, 01:05:24 PM »
I'm more worried about hopefully having Jaylen Watson back at some point in the playoffs.

I don't think he's coming back from a broken ankle this season.

https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/chiefs-designate-cb-jaylen-watson-to-return-from-ir

Obviously nothing guaranteed, but they're telling me there's a chance.

I tell my kid all the time that NFL players are basically aliens and not normal human beings, but having 2 guys break their legs and come back and play in the same season is just wild.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53907
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26009 on: January 03, 2025, 01:07:16 PM »
Rice is going to catch the winning toudie in the SB

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26010 on: January 05, 2025, 03:37:59 PM »
Carson get your crap together

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32519
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26011 on: January 05, 2025, 04:08:23 PM »
Poor Joe Burrow has to watch KC lose on purpose
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67452
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26012 on: January 05, 2025, 04:25:32 PM »
happy new year donks
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline Sandstone Outcropping

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11043
  • a punk who rarely ever took advice
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26013 on: January 05, 2025, 04:39:42 PM »
This is after thanksgiving dinner backyard type football.

Offline Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15573
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26014 on: January 05, 2025, 05:05:55 PM »
One thing is for certain, if the Chiefs ever lose about 18 of their starters at once, they’re in big trouble.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47951
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26015 on: January 05, 2025, 06:44:48 PM »
denver isn’t a bad team


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline DaBigTrain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12723
  • stuxnet, meltdown, spectre, Bitcoin, ffChamp
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26016 on: January 05, 2025, 11:27:07 PM »
Damn we suck guys
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"

https://blockstream.info/block/000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f

Offline Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15573
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26017 on: January 06, 2025, 07:35:34 AM »
denver isn’t a bad team

Are they going to beat Buffalo?

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40535
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26018 on: January 06, 2025, 08:49:38 AM »
happy new year donks
Happy new year to the kimcinnati carnesgals

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26019 on: January 06, 2025, 09:13:17 AM »

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40535
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26020 on: January 06, 2025, 10:15:00 AM »
mocat can you let snowbrag know we aren't going to get the 1 seed with 3 losses on the seas?

well well well

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67452
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26021 on: January 06, 2025, 02:25:23 PM »
Yesterdays win did absolutely nothing to help my fear of the bengals, in fact it made it worse

The difference between the chiefs and the bengals is when the Chiefs have 3 turnovers they win against a good team by 1 and when the bengals have 3 turnovers they lose to one of the worst teams in the league.

 :gocho:
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27689
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26022 on: January 07, 2025, 04:59:10 PM »
mocat can you let snowbrag know we aren't going to get the 1 seed with 3 losses on the seas?

well well well

If the Chiefs had 3 losses, the Bills would’ve played starters vs New England and they’d be the one seed. Not sure what you’re well welling about bud

Offline ben ji

  • Senior Moderator
  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 12305
  • Alot of people dont hit on an 18
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26023 on: January 08, 2025, 06:15:04 PM »
Went down an old school NFL rabbit hole and learned something new....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kansas_City_Cowboys_(NFL)

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40535
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #26024 on: January 09, 2025, 09:02:10 AM »
mocat can you let snowbrag know we aren't going to get the 1 seed with 3 losses on the seas?

well well well

If the Chiefs had 3 losses, the Bills would’ve played starters vs New England and they’d be the one seed. Not sure what you’re well welling about bud

what will the history books write?