Author Topic: CHIEFS  (Read 1502356 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline cfbandyman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9377
  • To da 'ville.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #24875 on: March 01, 2024, 08:38:44 AM »
It would be wild if we drafted the Tech DB who doesn't believe in space or planets.
:lol:

Someone texted me about this earlier. I don’t understand how some of these people have survived this long in life.

Like, maybe possibly thinking this is really really stupid, but saying this to a team that you want to pay you millions of dollars is on a whole other level of stupid.

It's impressive really
A&M Style: 1/19/13 Co-Champion of THE ED's College Basketball Challenge

The art of the deal with it poors

OG Elon hater with a tesla


Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #24876 on: March 01, 2024, 02:46:41 PM »
Who cares, can he blanket a receiver?
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51510
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #24877 on: March 01, 2024, 04:10:24 PM »
There's what? 7-11 chiefs games, maybe 5 concerts, and possibly a college game/futbol exhibition in the average year? 20 dates is probably generous. I'm glad the chiefs recognize how useless building an entertainment district would be. Maybe an attached hotel could pull enough.

Adding MORE parking and the cheapest of basic updates to the actual stadium is fantastically lol though

You know goddam well F'ing Chesney would make that money back every summer.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13574
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #24878 on: March 03, 2024, 07:34:59 PM »
If we were to draft a guy like xavier worthy with our first round pick I would never recover from it, I would never heal.

Online wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30434
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #24879 on: March 03, 2024, 08:02:56 PM »
We aren't drafting a WR in the first, it's not happening.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13574
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #24880 on: March 03, 2024, 09:24:58 PM »
I won’t rest easy until that 32nd pick is read off

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29281
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #24881 on: March 03, 2024, 09:46:19 PM »
How do you guys feel about the “always draft your highest rated available player” philosophy?

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19761
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #24882 on: March 03, 2024, 09:57:47 PM »
How do you guys feel about the “always draft your highest rated available player” philosophy?
*And also a need


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Online wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30434
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #24883 on: March 03, 2024, 10:04:05 PM »
We have plenty of sample size and Veach doesn't draft WR's in the 1st round. Plus the WR class is silly deep this year.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 46510
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #24884 on: March 03, 2024, 10:58:59 PM »
trade mahomes for two starting WR’s?


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29281
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #24885 on: March 04, 2024, 07:43:13 AM »
There always seem to be a lot of NFL pundits who advocate always taking the highest rated available player, but I wonder how many GM's really stick to that?

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27092
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #24886 on: March 04, 2024, 08:16:43 AM »
We have plenty of sample size and Veach doesn't draft WR's in the 1st round. Plus the WR class is silly deep this year.

just because he hasn't doesn't mean he won't

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29281
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #24887 on: March 04, 2024, 08:27:24 AM »
I think Veach has earned my trust 3 times over.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27092
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #24888 on: March 04, 2024, 08:34:21 AM »
He's not a great 1st round picker right after a super bowl win guy tho.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27092
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #24889 on: March 04, 2024, 09:15:26 AM »
Evans is staying with the Bucs

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39169
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #24890 on: March 04, 2024, 10:08:30 AM »
We have plenty of sample size and Veach doesn't draft WR's in the 1st round.

he's drafted (4) players in the first round so far: (2) DE, (1) CB, (1) RB


Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27092
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #24891 on: March 04, 2024, 10:27:43 AM »
Based on sample size looks like its a 25% chance he picks a RB 1st round.

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17593
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #24892 on: March 04, 2024, 10:50:17 AM »
At the money he's getting and the type of WR he is, I'm glad Evans is off the market.

Online wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30434
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #24893 on: March 04, 2024, 10:56:50 AM »
Based on sample size looks like its a 25% chance he picks a RB 1st round.

I can't tell if you are just giving me the ol cf3 business or if you think they are going to draft a WR in the 1st round?  Seems kind of a weird thing to do with the emergence of Rice and how much talent will likely still be left in the 2nd round at WR.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27092
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #24894 on: March 04, 2024, 11:00:39 AM »
Mostly the CF3 business, but I think a WR is a possibility that shouldn't be written off

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39169
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #24895 on: March 04, 2024, 11:14:10 AM »
you think they are going to draft a WR in the 1st round?  Seems kind of a weird thing to do with the emergence of Rice and how much talent will likely still be left in the 2nd round at WR.

these are real reasons to think they might avoid drafting a WR in the 1st round. Veach's drafting history in the 1st round is not.

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39169
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #24896 on: March 04, 2024, 11:31:47 AM »
in the first three rounds they should probably do some combination of tackle, defensive line, and WR. the order doesn't particularly matter to me.

if they get another 2nd rd pick from trading LJ, probably should try to find another versatile CB/S there

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13574
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #24897 on: March 04, 2024, 12:19:23 PM »
I probably would’ve just held onto mvs since he only had 1 year remaining

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27092
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #24898 on: March 04, 2024, 12:27:37 PM »
I probably would’ve just held onto mvs since he only had 1 year remaining

h no

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39169
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #24899 on: March 04, 2024, 12:35:09 PM »
unserious poster