Author Topic: CHIEFS  (Read 2116649 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27689
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23200 on: October 13, 2023, 11:06:51 AM »
They drove the ball at will, sucks they went 1 for 6 (?) on red zone TDs, but whatever Andy is not wasting the good plays against Denver. Butker is the best chiefs kicker in chiefs kicker history. The defense is so incred right now it made me think of Marty and DT watching this game together in heaven and then I started to get teary eyed. go cats

well said

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40534
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23201 on: October 13, 2023, 11:19:22 AM »
most difficult remaining schedules:

1 cincinnati
2 arizona
3 baltimore
4 seattle
5 carolina
6 denver
7 tennessee
8 philadelphia
9 san francisco
10 washington


easiest remaining schedules:

1 green bay
2 houston
3 indianapolis
4 atlanta
5 new orleans
6 detroit
7 kansas city
8 pittsburgh
9 buffalo
10 chicago

Your thing isn’t very good at ranking schedules.  I would rather play the niners schedule than ours and the bills remaining schedule is a gauntlet.

san francisco has to play more teams ranked #12 or better (6) than kansas city (3) or buffalo (4)

san francisco gets to play fewer teams ranked #20 or worse (4) than kansas city (7) or buffalo (6)


chiefs remaining opponents, ranked good to bad
#4
#5
#7
#16
#16
#20
#24
#25
#26
#26
#32 (last night)
#32

49ers remaning opponents, ranked good to bad
#4
#6
#8
#9
#11
#12
#15
#15
#23
#25
#27
#29

buffalo remaining opponents, ranked good to bad
#3
#4
#7
#8
#14
#16
#21
#24
#24
#25
#30
#32

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23202 on: October 13, 2023, 11:36:47 AM »
Mocat, I understand how it works, but it’s just wrong

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23203 on: October 13, 2023, 11:46:24 AM »
Take out their 5 easiest games and rerun it

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40534
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23204 on: October 13, 2023, 12:32:07 PM »
Take out their 5 easiest games and rerun it

which one of these looks most difficult in your bette davis eyes kim?

chiefs
#4
#5
#7
#16
#16
#20
#24

49ers
#4
#6
#8
#9
#11
#12
#15

bills
#3
#4
#7
#8
#14
#16
#21

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23205 on: October 13, 2023, 01:03:53 PM »
Mocat, all I know is I’d rather play the niners schedule than the chiefs

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40534
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23206 on: October 13, 2023, 01:22:25 PM »
that's why you're kim carnes

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23207 on: October 13, 2023, 01:38:37 PM »
Wait, do u disagree?

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40534
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23208 on: October 13, 2023, 01:54:09 PM »
Wait, do u disagree?

yes, the 49ers have a more difficult remaining schedule than the chiefs. feel free to provide a link to anyone besides internet poster kim carnes claiming otherwise

Online ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 18069
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23209 on: October 13, 2023, 03:12:39 PM »
The 49ers division is tougher than the Chiefs although I could see an argument there.  Cross-conference opponents give us the NFC North which is easier than the 49ers getting the AFC North. Intra-conference opponents give the 49ers the NFC East which is harder than the AFC South the Chiefs have. We do get the Eagles in the random 17th game whereas they get the Jags, which is where the 49ers have it easier.

I know the argument is for the remaining schedule, which is a little different, but I think the Chiefs have it pretty good.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23210 on: October 13, 2023, 03:49:55 PM »
My god guys, if you’re a middling team trying to make the playoffs then you could argue the niners schedule is harder, but we’re not.  The only scary teams on the niners schedule are the eagles and bengals (both of whom we play).  They are clear cut favorites in all of their other games.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23211 on: October 13, 2023, 04:01:47 PM »
And having tampa bay and indy at 8 and 11 is very suspect.  I would rather face either of those teams than the chargers. 

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40534
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23212 on: October 13, 2023, 04:47:04 PM »
My god guys, if you’re a middling team trying to make the playoffs then you could argue the niners schedule is harder, but we’re not. 

oh ok, i think the issue here is you are using a different definition of strength of schedule from the rest of the known universe

Offline Skipper44

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7629
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23213 on: October 14, 2023, 12:37:04 PM »
And having tampa bay and indy at 8 and 11 is very suspect.  I would rather face either of those teams than the chargers.
yes, i would like to see the qb next to the snobrag rating and this info would be useful for winning who makes the Super bowl bets

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32512
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23214 on: October 14, 2023, 01:01:06 PM »
The dude models the winner and exact spread of the Red River Rivalry and people still question his methods, smdh.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23215 on: October 14, 2023, 06:55:21 PM »
My god guys, if you’re a middling team trying to make the playoffs then you could argue the niners schedule is harder, but we’re not. 

oh ok, i think the issue here is you are using a different definition of strength of schedule from the rest of the known universe

The chiefs schedule is less favorable than the niners and it’s not debatable u nerd

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27689
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23216 on: October 15, 2023, 01:39:48 PM »
kim carnes I think you might be wrong about the Bengals. They are not good.

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40534
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23217 on: October 15, 2023, 03:42:12 PM »
My god guys, if you’re a middling team trying to make the playoffs then you could argue the niners schedule is harder, but we’re not. 

oh ok, i think the issue here is you are using a different definition of strength of schedule from the rest of the known universe

The chiefs schedule is less favorable than the niners and it’s not debatable u nerd

amaze

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23218 on: October 15, 2023, 06:42:02 PM »
kim carnes I think you might be wrong about the Bengals. They are not good.

I have no reason to believe they won’t be the same team they have been in years past by the end of the season.  They have all the same pieces, same coaches, their defense still looks good, burrow is getting healthier…

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27689
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23219 on: October 15, 2023, 07:57:29 PM »
kim carnes I think you might be wrong about the Bengals. They are not good.

I have no reason to believe they won’t be the same team they have been in years past by the end of the season.  They have all the same pieces, same coaches, their defense still looks good, burrow is getting healthier…

Perhaps

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40534
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23220 on: October 16, 2023, 07:14:44 AM »

Offline WildcatNkilt

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7002
  • Had the worst birthday ever on Dec. 5th of '98.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23221 on: October 16, 2023, 08:18:26 AM »
Chiefs tied for best record in NFL.   :cool:
Kansas City Blue Barbecue fan.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27689
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23222 on: October 16, 2023, 09:44:06 AM »
The wins against Jacksonville and the Jets looks p good right about now  :gocho:

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59523
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23223 on: October 16, 2023, 12:16:58 PM »
After their first 2 TD drives the Bengals offense couldn't do anything yesterday.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23224 on: October 16, 2023, 03:22:13 PM »
Folks, it’s a long season, if you want to allow mocats thing to think for you then by all means.  I prefer to use a variety of metrics to shape my opinion of the league.