Author Topic: CHIEFS  (Read 1584480 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Phil Titola

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15360
  • He took it out!
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #21625 on: January 06, 2023, 11:18:37 AM »
So the only way for the Chiefs to host would be for us to play a team other than the Bills or the Bengals?
Or if the bills and Bengals both lose this weekend, meaning neither of them could have had a chance at the 1 seed with another game anyway
Actually if the chiefs win tomorrow, the Bengals are irrelevant. If the chiefs win and bills lose, conf champ game would be at arrowhead

Accurate. Amazing how many people are getting this so wrong. Small chance this neutral thing even comes into play. I don't think the Bills can win three straight to even make it a factor.

But if they do, see you in Indy!

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39266
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #21626 on: January 06, 2023, 12:11:10 PM »
Indy or Detroit AFC CCG makes me want to puke

Offline WildcatNkilt

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6946
  • Had the worst birthday ever on Dec. 5th of '98.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #21627 on: January 06, 2023, 12:16:43 PM »
Why?
Kansas City Blue Barbecue fan.

Offline Skipper44

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7576
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #21628 on: January 06, 2023, 12:28:19 PM »
not sure could pick a stade with worse juju for the Chiefs than Indy - i would rather play the Bills in Buffalo 

Offline DreamWeaver69

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2128
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #21629 on: January 06, 2023, 12:32:02 PM »
Detroit makes me want to barf and that would definitely be a home game for Buffalo fans. Cheap flights. Not a terrible drive.

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39266
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #21630 on: January 06, 2023, 12:40:11 PM »
not sure could pick a stade with worse juju for the Chiefs than Indy - i would rather play the Bills in Buffalo

Yep this and also just dome in general is barf city to me

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29434
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #21631 on: January 06, 2023, 01:47:16 PM »
Vegas is the right answer for the possible neutral site game.

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19897
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #21632 on: January 06, 2023, 01:49:21 PM »
Chiefs should be 1 seed and host.  Sorry your guy got hurt and the game got cancelled.

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17662
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #21633 on: January 06, 2023, 01:55:19 PM »
Vegas is the right answer for the possible neutral site game.

Without a doubt.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27140
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #21634 on: January 06, 2023, 02:52:11 PM »
Imagine the game at the Bill  :love:

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13595
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #21635 on: January 06, 2023, 03:03:20 PM »
The bills didn’t play the hardest game on their schedule, like wtf…

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39266
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #21636 on: January 06, 2023, 03:10:28 PM »
The bills didn’t play the hardest game on their schedule, like wtf…
The chiefs are better than the Bengals, sorry kim

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13595
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #21637 on: January 06, 2023, 03:13:11 PM »
The bills didn’t play the hardest game on their schedule, like wtf…
The chiefs are better than the Bengals, sorry kim

We lost to the bengals, and I’d rather play the chiefs at home than the bengals on the road

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37188
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #21638 on: January 06, 2023, 03:46:42 PM »
The Bengals also had the lead. So I'm assuming if the game would have been finished, the Bills would have to resume from a point where the Bengals had the ball, the lead, and some time was off the clock. Way less than 50% chance they end up winning.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29434
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #21639 on: January 06, 2023, 07:54:11 PM »
The bills didn’t play the hardest game on their schedule, like wtf…
The chiefs are better than the Bengals, sorry kim

We lost to the bengals, and I’d rather play the chiefs at home than the bengals on the road
I wonder what the result would be if you polled every HC in the NFL and asked them whether they’d like to face KC or Cincy?

Offline Phil Titola

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15360
  • He took it out!
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #21640 on: January 07, 2023, 10:21:34 AM »
The bills didn’t play the hardest game on their schedule, like wtf…
The chiefs are better than the Bengals, sorry kim

We lost to the bengals, and I’d rather play the chiefs at home than the bengals on the road

This sentence is a wreck.

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39266
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #21641 on: January 07, 2023, 03:16:37 PM »
Oh good Steve levy and Dan O

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27140
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile

Offline DreamWeaver69

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2128
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #21643 on: January 07, 2023, 04:43:38 PM »
Give me that 1 seed, baby!

Offline DaBigTrain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12047
  • stuxnet, meltdown, spectre, Bitcoin, ffChamp
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #21644 on: January 07, 2023, 08:24:51 PM »
Watched the game outside today! Was a really nice day to clinch.
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"

https://blockstream.info/block/000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f

Offline DreamWeaver69

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2128
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #21645 on: January 07, 2023, 08:51:12 PM »
Watched the game outside today! Was a really nice day to clinch.
Where do you live now?

Offline DaBigTrain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12047
  • stuxnet, meltdown, spectre, Bitcoin, ffChamp
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #21646 on: January 07, 2023, 11:30:24 PM »
Watched the game outside today! Was a really nice day to clinch.
Where do you live now?
I’d rather not say for fear of being personally attacked when I say something that triggers you.
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"

https://blockstream.info/block/000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f

Offline DreamWeaver69

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2128
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #21647 on: January 08, 2023, 07:49:05 AM »
 :lol:

We get it. You live in San Antonio.

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39266
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #21648 on: January 08, 2023, 10:17:13 AM »
the chiefs in the patrick mahomes era

W-L, ppg-opponents ppg (margin)
2018: 12-4 (1 seed), 35.3-26.3 (+9.0)
2019: 12-4 (2 seed), 28.2-19.3 (+8.9)
2020: 14-2 (1 seed), 29.6-22.5 (+7.1)
2021: 12-5 (2 seed), 28.2-21.4 (+6.8)
2022: 14-3 (1 seed), 29.2-21.7 (+7.5)

mahomes stats
2018: 5097 yds, 50 td, 9 int, 8.8 y/a; 60 rush, 272 yds, 2 td, 4.5 y/a
2019: 4031 yds, 26 td, 5 int, 8.3 y/a; 43 rush, 218 yds, 2 td, 5.1 y/a
2020: 4740 yds, 38 td, 6 int, 8.1 y/a; 62 rush, 308 yds, 2 td, 5.0 y/a
2021: 4839 yds, 37 td, 13 int, 7.4 y/a; 66 rush, 381 yds, 2 td, 5.8 y/a
2022: 5250 yds, 41 td, 12 int, 8.1 y/a; 61 rush, 358 yds, 4 td, 5.9 y/a

reg season records (2018-2022)
home: 32-9 (.780)
away: 32-9 (.780)

vs afc west: 26-4 (.867)
vs afc overall: 45-15 (.750)
vs nfc: 19-3 (.864)
overall: 64-18 (.780)


playoff records
11 games, 8-3 record, 32.4-25.5 (+6.8)
mahomes: 3381 yds, 28 td, 7 int, 8.0 y/a; 55 rush, 323 yds, 5 td, 5.9 y/a

Offline waks

  • this blog's dick pic expert
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3459
  • Aggieville's Original Gastropub
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #21649 on: January 08, 2023, 10:20:06 AM »
:lol:

We get it. You live in San Antonio.
Lol, it took you less than 9 hours to make his point.