Author Topic: CHIEFS  (Read 1501320 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14960
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22550 on: February 13, 2023, 02:09:10 PM »
Philly has been killing teams with the QB sneak all year long.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22551 on: February 13, 2023, 02:20:29 PM »
I don't know how they got Hurts all the way through an NFL season running him like that.

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19761
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22552 on: February 13, 2023, 03:00:44 PM »
I mean, he was out several weeks with a shoulder injury.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22553 on: February 13, 2023, 03:10:30 PM »
I don't think that Goedert catch was a catch.

100% was not, neither was the one by the eagles receiver in the first half and I don't give two shits about the chiefs

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39169
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22554 on: February 13, 2023, 03:16:30 PM »
I don't think that Goedert catch was a catch.

100% was not, neither was the one by the eagles receiver in the first half and I don't give two shits about the chiefs

it was really close, but when Goedert finally got control, his back foot had not come off the ground yet. his front foot then came down in bounds. catch.

Offline DaBigTrain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11816
  • stuxnet, meltdown, spectre, Bitcoin, ffChamp
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22555 on: February 13, 2023, 03:24:16 PM »
So what if we won like, 7-8 more ships with Mahomes? Why not us huh?
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"

https://blockstream.info/block/000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f

Offline Phil Titola

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15308
  • He took it out!
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22556 on: February 13, 2023, 03:48:28 PM »
I can't believe how much media was really behind the eagles.  The griping, bitching about that flag outed a lot of dorks.

I feel like it's mostly because of how it made the end of a great game just kind peter out.

Offline Phil Titola

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15308
  • He took it out!
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22557 on: February 13, 2023, 03:49:47 PM »
So what if we won like, 7-8 more ships with Mahomes? Why not us huh?

Seems like next couple years are basically a lock. Really hoping we are in the 2024 season SB. Want to experience a SB in New Orleans.

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 21448
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22558 on: February 13, 2023, 03:50:40 PM »
I can't believe how much media was really behind the eagles.  The griping, bitching about that flag outed a lot of dorks.

I feel like it's mostly because of how it made the end of a great game just kind peter out.

Yeah. For Iggles fans ...

Offline Phil Titola

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15308
  • He took it out!
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22559 on: February 13, 2023, 03:52:57 PM »
I can't believe how much media was really behind the eagles.  The griping, bitching about that flag outed a lot of dorks.

I feel like it's mostly because of how it made the end of a great game just kind peter out.

Yeah. For Iggles fans ...

and any neutral fan but yeah I was a-okay with it!

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39169
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22560 on: February 13, 2023, 04:10:28 PM »
final snowbrag rankings. the chiefs finally passed the bills and should hang a banner.

1. kansas city 82.8
2. buffalo 82.3
3. cincinnati 78.8
4. san francisco 77.9
5. philadelphia 77.7
6. dallas 67.6
7. miami 65.2
8. baltimore 63.4
9. ny jets 56.3
10. new england 55.8


also every ranking system has the same top 5 grouped together in some order, with dallas at #6

538
1. kansas city 1733
2. cincinnati 1688
3. philadelphia 1677
4. buffalo 1661
5. san francisco 1644
6. dallas 1631
7. baltimore 1599
8. la chargers 1535
9. minnesota 1534
10. jacksonville 1531

sagarin
1. kansas city 27.14
2. cincinnati 26.89
3. san francisco 26.39
4. buffalo 26.13
5. philadelphia 25.77
6. dallas 25.07
7. la chargers 22.36
8. green bay 21.72
9. baltimore 21.58
10. jacksonville 21.09

massey
1. kansas city 9.29
2. philadelphia 9.12
3. cincinnati 9.06
4. buffalo 9.03
5. san francisco 9.00
6. dallas 8.88
7. baltimore 8.63
8. minnesota 8.60
9. pittsburgh 8.55
10. miami 8.47

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39169
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22561 on: February 13, 2023, 04:13:35 PM »
System is flawed if it thinks Miami is the 7th best team in the NFL

rank teams 7-10 from this pile:

miami
baltimore
ny jets
new england
la chargers
minnesota
jacksonville
green bay
pittsburgh

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64043
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22562 on: February 13, 2023, 04:49:30 PM »
Pile of trash
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline WildcatNkilt

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6930
  • Had the worst birthday ever on Dec. 5th of '98.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22563 on: February 13, 2023, 05:02:01 PM »
I don't know how they got Hurts all the way through an NFL season running him like that.

Hurts is a really good QB, and he won't last long in the league if they keep running him like that.  Eagles should be grabbing OL in the draft as Kelce and I think one other are close to retirement. 
Kansas City Blue Barbecue fan.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27092
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22564 on: February 13, 2023, 08:12:26 PM »
System is flawed if it thinks Miami is the 7th best team in the NFL

rank teams 7-10 from this pile:

miami
baltimore
ny jets
new england
la chargers
minnesota
jacksonville
green bay
pittsburgh

Jax
LA
‘Sota
Balt
Pitt
Mia
The rest

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27092
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22565 on: February 13, 2023, 08:13:24 PM »
Please tell me CEH is off the team starting at the end of the parade

Offline Phil Titola

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15308
  • He took it out!
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22566 on: February 13, 2023, 08:50:36 PM »
This parade is going to be double as busy as LIV. Popping bottles at 8am at my place

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53336
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22567 on: February 13, 2023, 09:00:36 PM »
Ain't no party like at #fanningbrag level party  :thumbsup:

Offline tdaver

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1887
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22568 on: February 13, 2023, 09:20:21 PM »
I am interested in why the announcer said Ju-Ju's full name every single time he said his name.  That's a really long name to say.  Why not pick a player with a shorter name if you are going to decide to say just one player's full name every time?  It made no sense.

Showing off for casual watchers.  His name sounds funny and is a little tricky to spit the whole thing out, so gotta let everyone know how good he is at this broadcasting craft.  Heard it a lot with Felix this season as well.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22569 on: February 14, 2023, 09:33:30 AM »
I don't know how they got Hurts all the way through an NFL season running him like that.

Hurts is a really good QB, and he won't last long in the league if they keep running him like that.  Eagles should be grabbing OL in the draft as Kelce and I think one other are close to retirement.

Yeah, but you can have the best OL ever assembled and your QB is still going to take a lot of shots if you run a bunch of designed QB draws.

Offline Sandstone Outcropping

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8692
  • a punk who rarely ever took advice
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22570 on: February 14, 2023, 09:35:41 AM »
Probably discussed earlier ITT and I know it was the right call by advanced metrics, etc but it is was still very weird for me to see the Chiefs down the ball instead of taking the TD at the end of the game. Basically, Butker just has to connect on a PAT which is close to a sure thing but still not 100%. Worked out perfectly for the Chiefs, I guess.

Also, is it weird that the Chiefs offense is so good without a household name (eg Emmitt Smith, Jamaal Charles, Beastmode) as a starting RB?

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22571 on: February 14, 2023, 09:40:36 AM »
Probably discussed earlier ITT and I know it was the right call by advanced metrics, etc but it is was still very weird for me to see the Chiefs down the ball instead of taking the TD at the end of the game. Basically, Butker just has to connect on a PAT which is close to a sure thing but still not 100%. Worked out perfectly for the Chiefs, I guess.

Also, is it weird that the Chiefs offense is so good without a household name (eg Emmitt Smith, Jamaal Charles, Beastmode) as a starting RB?

The Patriots won a lot of super bowls without a household name at RB.

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39169
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22572 on: February 14, 2023, 10:01:51 AM »
UPDATED

the chiefs in the patrick mahomes era

playoff records
11 games, 8-3 record, 32.4-25.5 (+6.8)
mahomes: 3381 yds, 28 td, 7 int, 8.0 y/a; 55 rush, 323 yds, 5 td, 5.9 y/a

playoff records
14 games, 11-3 record, 31.7-25.4 (+6.3)
mahomes: 4084 yds, 35 td, 7 int, 7.8 y/a; 67 rush, 383 yds, 5 td, 5.7 y/a


as a starter in the regular season, mahomes is 64-16 (.800)
as a starter in the postseason, mahomes is 11-3 (.786)

DUMB!

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39169
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22573 on: February 14, 2023, 10:02:37 AM »
Probably discussed earlier ITT and I know it was the right call by advanced metrics, etc but it is was still very weird for me to see the Chiefs down the ball instead of taking the TD at the end of the game. Basically, Butker just has to connect on a PAT which is close to a sure thing but still not 100%. Worked out perfectly for the Chiefs, I guess.

Also, is it weird that the Chiefs offense is so good without a household name (eg Emmitt Smith, Jamaal Charles, Beastmode) as a starting RB?

the goal at the end was to ensure the eagles never got the ball back.

RB's don't matter, and paying one superstar money is a poor use of resources.

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39169
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #22574 on: February 14, 2023, 10:03:28 AM »
did you guys know in his last ever game, tom brady lost to the team that lost to the team that lost to the team that lost to patrick mahomes? wow