Author Topic: CHIEFS  (Read 1498901 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13560
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #20200 on: January 18, 2022, 02:00:32 PM »
I’m so gd nervous about this game

Offline WildcatNkilt

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6930
  • Had the worst birthday ever on Dec. 5th of '98.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #20201 on: January 18, 2022, 02:33:00 PM »
For sure.  Bills can be lethal, and they can also look like crap.  I hope we get the crap version since we already experienced the lethal version. 
Kansas City Blue Barbecue fan.

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19757
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #20202 on: January 18, 2022, 02:33:02 PM »
Bills played the weakest schedule in the nfl

They Will be a handful but if kc plays an A game chiefs win


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39143
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #20203 on: January 18, 2022, 04:49:21 PM »
F yeah, keep giving me all of this kind of stupid crap. i will eat it up like an idiot

https://twitter.com/RickGosselin9/status/1483542548375351300?s=20

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29278
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #20204 on: January 18, 2022, 07:30:23 PM »
F yeah, keep giving me all of this kind of stupid crap. i will eat it up like an idiot

https://twitter.com/RickGosselin9/status/1483542548375351300?s=20

Does that mean they had the second most penalties called or second least? :dunno:

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39143
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #20205 on: January 18, 2022, 07:34:04 PM »
Second fewest penalties

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 21427
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #20206 on: January 18, 2022, 07:34:12 PM »
F yeah, keep giving me all of this kind of stupid crap. i will eat it up like an idiot

https://twitter.com/RickGosselin9/status/1483542548375351300?s=20

Does that mean they had the second most penalties called or second least? :dunno:

With that hussey, you never know.

Offline Phil Titola

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15304
  • He took it out!
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #20207 on: January 18, 2022, 09:50:02 PM »
What a hussey

Offline Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14960
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #20208 on: January 19, 2022, 08:28:05 AM »
What a hussey


hus·sy -  noun
a girl or woman who behaves in a disrespectful or inappropriate way or who has many casual sexual relationships.

Offline Shooter Jones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5634
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #20209 on: January 19, 2022, 10:47:54 AM »
If I were the DC, I'd have a great gameplan w/ no Sorenson or Niemann and Gay spying Allen. I would be very confident (why am I not an NFL DC?)

But, I have very little confidence that Spags will do the right thing, and that is why I am kinda stressed.

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 21427
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #20210 on: January 19, 2022, 11:08:40 AM »
If I were the DC, I'd have a great gameplan w/ no Sorenson or Niemann and Gay spying Allen. I would be very confident (why am I not an NFL DC?)

But, I have very little confidence that Spags will do the right thing, and that is why I am kinda stressed.

This game is downright frightening.

Offline yoga-like_abana

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13242
  • Don't @ me boy, cause I ain't said crap
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #20211 on: January 19, 2022, 11:44:20 AM »
If I were the DC, I'd have a great gameplan w/ no Sorenson or Niemann and Gay spying Allen. I would be very confident (why am I not an NFL DC?)

But, I have very little confidence that Spags will do the right thing, and that is why I am kinda stressed.

This game is downright frightening.
Hopefully the man in the back says everyone attack and it turns into a ballroom blitz

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13560
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #20212 on: January 19, 2022, 11:54:28 AM »
If I were the DC, I'd have a great gameplan w/ no Sorenson or Niemann and Gay spying Allen. I would be very confident (why am I not an NFL DC?)

But, I have very little confidence that Spags will do the right thing, and that is why I am kinda stressed.

Ya we’ve gone to the super bowl both years he’s been dc, he sucks.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #20213 on: January 19, 2022, 11:56:07 AM »
 :lol:

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39143
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #20214 on: January 19, 2022, 11:57:40 AM »
i forced myself to watch the week 5 highlights, and my goodness that was a flukey game. the chiefs had 4 turnovers (one of which was a pick-6), plus a turnover on downs, had an interception called back due to a BS roughing the passer call, no Chris Jones, no Charvarius Ward. and Mahomes was in his "throw balls away in the dirt rather than dump off to the RB" phase
EDIT: also no Melvin Ingram, obvs
i feel way better after watching. seriously go watch the highlights, they can't hurt you anymore.
« Last Edit: January 19, 2022, 12:20:54 PM by mocat »

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13560
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #20215 on: January 19, 2022, 12:12:05 PM »
Our earlier loss has absolutely no bearing on me being nervous. If anything, it actually makes me feel better about this game.

Offline kstate4life

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 938
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #20216 on: January 19, 2022, 12:42:26 PM »
i forced myself to watch the week 5 highlights, and my goodness that was a flukey game. the chiefs had 4 turnovers (one of which was a pick-6), plus a turnover on downs, had an interception called back due to a BS roughing the passer call, no Chris Jones, no Charvarius Ward. and Mahomes was in his "throw balls away in the dirt rather than dump off to the RB" phase
EDIT: also no Melvin Ingram, obvs
i feel way better after watching. seriously go watch the highlights, they can't hurt you anymore.

Just re-watched.  Man you are right, super flukey!  Defense was WEAK (damn you Sorensen) that first half, but did a great job of adjusting in the 2nd, even without Jones and Ward.  We should be able to take some things away from that.  Those turnovers were awful too.  They scored at least 14 pts right after they happened.  A couple dropped balls for first downs, and awful penalty calls that screwed us.  I am glad we played already this year and lost.  Now all the pressure is on Allen to get past Mahomes in the playoffs.  We should be motivated and loose for this one, just can't come out tentative again.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #20217 on: January 19, 2022, 12:45:31 PM »
I was at that Bills game, so it still haunts me a little bit, but I also haven't watched us lose at home in the playoffs for quite sometime, so we got this.

Offline Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14960
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #20218 on: January 19, 2022, 01:07:07 PM »
I blame week 5 loss on the all red uniforms.

Offline kstate4life

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 938
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #20219 on: January 19, 2022, 01:31:48 PM »
I blame week 5 loss on the all red uniforms.

Same. I have it in my head that it's a curse.

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 21427
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #20220 on: January 19, 2022, 01:33:16 PM »
I've been saying that for years. You guys need to ketchup.

Offline Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14960
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #20221 on: January 19, 2022, 01:34:02 PM »
I've been saying that for years. You guys need to ketchup.
'Your grammar is terrible.  It's catsup. 

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39143
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #20222 on: January 19, 2022, 01:35:06 PM »
i was at the sunday night game in 2018 where we trucked the bengals 45-10 in all reds.   :don'tcare:

Offline kstate4life

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 938
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #20223 on: January 19, 2022, 02:16:46 PM »
2-2 in all reds with Mahomes (6-5 overall)
2 wins - Bengals, Broncos
2 losses - Colts, Bills

.500 winning percentage is far less than his overall... it's def a curse!

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 46496
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #20224 on: January 19, 2022, 07:10:55 PM »
while I want the chiefs to win because how about them chiefs, i really hate this “the bills mafia” thing that was invented like two years ago while they act like they’ve been around for decades so crushing the bills mafioso faces will be equally as good as the chiefs advancing


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.