In a related matter, I enjoyed this exchange on the Wabash....
gitrdone!
Post #3294
MyFanPage
Add Buddy
If KSU has to pay Prince, what are our chances of recovery against Krause? Reply
The more I read about the depositions this week the less confident I am of KSU getting out of paying Prince. I'm no attorney and am curious if we have a strong case against Krause to try recover our losses. It's a very unpleasant situation KSU finds itself in: to perhaps file suit against its former AD whose wife works for the university and in-laws are some of its biggest supporters. Have to feel bad for the Vaniers and Schultz and Currie to try and resolve this thing.
By the way, Krause's idea of taking out a life insurance policy on himself is almost certainly not something any life insurance underwriter would ever consider. There is no "insurable interest" that would pass muster. Stupid stupid idea.
KStateBate
Post #7910
MyFanPage
Add Buddy
Re: If KSU has to pay Prince, what are our chances of recovery against Krause?
Do you really want to piss off the "Vanier Family"? I would leave that one alone. We messed up by putting him in that position that he was not prepared/trained to handle. Period. EMAW
Is there really a reasonable expectation that going forward that the Vanier family will contribute more to the University than the amount that their son-in-law mumped us out of?

I honestly don't know, serious question.
While the Vaniers have obviously contributed a great deal in the past, it doesn't ensure that they'll contribute more in the future. Personally, I thought that the timeliness of Krause's wife ditching him was more of a play to prevent the attachment to Vanier family assets should Bob get his mother rough ridin' ass sued off. I say we do THAT.