Author Topic: It’s time to have a conversation about Jerome Tang  (Read 24068 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline nicname

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16870
  • Deal with it.
    • View Profile
Re: It’s time to have a conversation about Jerome Tang
« Reply #150 on: January 14, 2025, 12:10:10 PM »
Don't invoke KSO over here.

People are talking about things exactly as the occurred during the course of the season.

Suggestion for Jerome Tang and company: Don't come off of 10 days of practice looking like hot garbage and getting worked by Drake and 2 transfers from Northwest Missouri State.  Then get back into the game, then produce a hot garbage Weberesque out of a time out last shot play.  Then have a guy who was bitching about conditioning on a podcast be completely gassed at crunch and clanking critical FT's.

Lose the game . . . take responsibility for it, which is fine. Then start having your player (and you) start throwing in the completely unnecessary references to mean Tweets . . . which in turn undermines or waters down you taking responsibility for not having your team ready to play.

You cannot demand butts in seats, get not one but two pay raises in 2 years, be out there on the circuit openly brow beating the grass roots (and BMD's) for NIL money, be given that NIL money to go get dudes . . . produce this product, and then expect people to just sit back and accept what they're seeing.

That's not the way it works in this world, dude.

Did you mention openly testing job market?

That being said anyone who tweets at any player is a weirdo

Word is the dude who tweeted the real
Mean stuff wasn’t even a cat fan, but a disgruntled gambler
Do we think a gambler will physically attack a player someday in the US? I bet there's a good chance. (Heh)

There is a great chance.

https://newrepublic.com/article/189263/online-sports-betting-alito-losses

I completely foreswore sports betting after losing a big bet on K-State beating Arky St. after j rake told me it was a sure thing because Arky St had a COVID outbreak. I genuinely thank him for that.

As far as the best argument that I and many others used to make about bringing black markets public....I have to admit I'm not quite as sure about it any more. Who is the more efficient and ruthless capitalist? Tony Soprano or Wall Street?

I am typing this from Vegas where I am visiting some family for the holidays and the entire city is a monument to inequality, pleasure and misery. It is the most American city because it reflects America back to ourselves.

I think a slight improvement would be to remove the sports betting from phones/internet and decouple the insanely addictive dopamine hit of the phone, the anonymity and comfort of placing the bet in shameful isolation.

You want to place a bet? Great. Go hang out at the dog tracks, horse tracks, OTBs, sports books and casinos. Smell the cigarette smoke and look around and see if this is what you want.

Quote
Perhaps the striking finding by the SMU team, however, was the confirmation of the oldest data point in the history of gambling: The house always wins. Fewer than 5 percent of the gamblers that its survey tracked withdrew more money than they deposited from online sports betting apps. This is unsurprising, partly because the odds are always tilted in the sportsbook’s favor and partly because sports betting companies go to great lengths to freeze out gamblers with a track record of success. The Wall Street Journal reported in July on how some winning bettors will find themselves unable to place more than a few dollars or even as little as 50 cents in future bets, limiting the sportsbook’s potential losses—and the customer’s potential success.

While sportsbooks suppress the winners, they take extraordinary pains to keep everyone else chasing their losses. This can be particularly dangerous when addiction is a factor. The Athletic profiled an Arizona man who lost more than $110,000 during a 15-month betting spree, which saw him take out multiple loans and contemplate suicide to erase his debts before coming clean to his wife and seeking help. Like many addicts, he hoped that one big win could help erase dozens of smaller losses.

He hated himself. Several times, he tried quitting and would go days without placing a bet. Then his phone would ping. It was his VIP representative from FanDuel with a text message.

Hey Jordan … I just gave you a $200 bonus bet into your account.

Beautiful
If there was a gif of nicname thwarting the attempted-flag-taker and then gesturing him to suck it, followed by motioning for all of Hilton Shelter to boo him louder, it'd be better than that auburn gif.

Offline cfbandyman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10941
  • To da 'ville.
    • View Profile
Re: It’s time to have a conversation about Jerome Tang
« Reply #151 on: January 14, 2025, 01:44:47 PM »
Don't invoke KSO over here.

People are talking about things exactly as the occurred during the course of the season.

Suggestion for Jerome Tang and company: Don't come off of 10 days of practice looking like hot garbage and getting worked by Drake and 2 transfers from Northwest Missouri State.  Then get back into the game, then produce a hot garbage Weberesque out of a time out last shot play.  Then have a guy who was bitching about conditioning on a podcast be completely gassed at crunch and clanking critical FT's.

Lose the game . . . take responsibility for it, which is fine. Then start having your player (and you) start throwing in the completely unnecessary references to mean Tweets . . . which in turn undermines or waters down you taking responsibility for not having your team ready to play.

You cannot demand butts in seats, get not one but two pay raises in 2 years, be out there on the circuit openly brow beating the grass roots (and BMD's) for NIL money, be given that NIL money to go get dudes . . . produce this product, and then expect people to just sit back and accept what they're seeing.

That's not the way it works in this world, dude.

Did you mention openly testing job market?

That being said anyone who tweets at any player is a weirdo

Word is the dude who tweeted the real
Mean stuff wasn’t even a cat fan, but a disgruntled gambler
Do we think a gambler will physically attack a player someday in the US? I bet there's a good chance. (Heh)

There is a great chance.

https://newrepublic.com/article/189263/online-sports-betting-alito-losses

I completely foreswore sports betting after losing a big bet on K-State beating Arky St. after j rake told me it was a sure thing because Arky St had a COVID outbreak. I genuinely thank him for that.

As far as the best argument that I and many others used to make about bringing black markets public....I have to admit I'm not quite as sure about it any more. Who is the more efficient and ruthless capitalist? Tony Soprano or Wall Street?

I am typing this from Vegas where I am visiting some family for the holidays and the entire city is a monument to inequality, pleasure and misery. It is the most American city because it reflects America back to ourselves.

I think a slight improvement would be to remove the sports betting from phones/internet and decouple the insanely addictive dopamine hit of the phone, the anonymity and comfort of placing the bet in shameful isolation.

You want to place a bet? Great. Go hang out at the dog tracks, horse tracks, OTBs, sports books and casinos. Smell the cigarette smoke and look around and see if this is what you want.

Quote
Perhaps the striking finding by the SMU team, however, was the confirmation of the oldest data point in the history of gambling: The house always wins. Fewer than 5 percent of the gamblers that its survey tracked withdrew more money than they deposited from online sports betting apps. This is unsurprising, partly because the odds are always tilted in the sportsbook’s favor and partly because sports betting companies go to great lengths to freeze out gamblers with a track record of success. The Wall Street Journal reported in July on how some winning bettors will find themselves unable to place more than a few dollars or even as little as 50 cents in future bets, limiting the sportsbook’s potential losses—and the customer’s potential success.

While sportsbooks suppress the winners, they take extraordinary pains to keep everyone else chasing their losses. This can be particularly dangerous when addiction is a factor. The Athletic profiled an Arizona man who lost more than $110,000 during a 15-month betting spree, which saw him take out multiple loans and contemplate suicide to erase his debts before coming clean to his wife and seeking help. Like many addicts, he hoped that one big win could help erase dozens of smaller losses.

He hated himself. Several times, he tried quitting and would go days without placing a bet. Then his phone would ping. It was his VIP representative from FanDuel with a text message.

Hey Jordan … I just gave you a $200 bonus bet into your account.

I concur, and it's sort of the same reason we keep voting for a certain someone to be prez (not wanting to pit this up tho). Vegas is not necessarily the most extreme version of America, it's more the most unfettered reality of it.

Also, JFC is that gross what the books do, though not surprised. 
A&M Style: 1/19/13 Co-Champion of THE ED's College Basketball Challenge

The art of the deal with it poors

OG Elon hater


Offline Skipper44

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7629
    • View Profile
Re: It’s time to have a conversation about Jerome Tang
« Reply #152 on: January 14, 2025, 08:14:32 PM »
this Tech crowd is late stage Asbury bad  :'bye cruel world:

Offline Sandstone Outcropping

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10706
  • a punk who rarely ever took advice
    • View Profile
Re: It’s time to have a conversation about Jerome Tang
« Reply #153 on: January 14, 2025, 08:43:37 PM »
this Tech crowd is late stage Asbury bad  :'bye cruel world:
Classic midweek grinder!

Offline HerrSonntag

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3443
    • View Profile
Re: It’s time to have a conversation about Jerome Tang
« Reply #154 on: January 14, 2025, 09:02:12 PM »
are we allowed to get excited about a 10-0 run or is everyone already too #BID?

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55873
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: It’s time to have a conversation about Jerome Tang
« Reply #155 on: January 14, 2025, 09:07:50 PM »
are we allowed to get excited about a 10-0 run or is everyone already too #BID?

enjoy it! our friend DNG is playing hard!

Offline EMAWzifried

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3281
    • View Profile
Re: It’s time to have a conversation about Jerome Tang
« Reply #156 on: January 14, 2025, 09:23:57 PM »
Team doing a lot right, but still can't rebound.

Offline EMAWzifried

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3281
    • View Profile
Re: It’s time to have a conversation about Jerome Tang
« Reply #157 on: January 14, 2025, 09:30:45 PM »
SIGH. We had our moment.

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47839
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: It’s time to have a conversation about Jerome Tang
« Reply #158 on: January 14, 2025, 09:30:50 PM »
what does tacos and tequila night consist of?


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline Kid In the Hall

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1413
    • View Profile
Re: It’s time to have a conversation about Jerome Tang
« Reply #159 on: January 14, 2025, 09:32:40 PM »
what does tacos and tequila night consist of?

Presumably pulling the self-trigger in the bathroom after every run of 10+ we give up...

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55873
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: It’s time to have a conversation about Jerome Tang
« Reply #160 on: January 14, 2025, 09:38:58 PM »
Not dead yet!

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55873
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: It’s time to have a conversation about Jerome Tang
« Reply #161 on: January 14, 2025, 09:55:32 PM »
jesus this team

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55873
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: It’s time to have a conversation about Jerome Tang
« Reply #162 on: January 14, 2025, 09:58:02 PM »
It's unreal we're only down 2 in the last 2 minutes

Offline Kid In the Hall

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1413
    • View Profile
Re: It’s time to have a conversation about Jerome Tang
« Reply #163 on: January 14, 2025, 09:58:57 PM »
Can we give both teams a loss?

Jesus christ the last 5 minutes have been awful both ways

Offline EMAWzifried

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3281
    • View Profile
Re: It’s time to have a conversation about Jerome Tang
« Reply #164 on: January 14, 2025, 10:01:29 PM »
We found a team that handles the ball worse than we do. Unreal. Let's hoot more 3s

Offline EMAWzifried

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3281
    • View Profile
Re: It’s time to have a conversation about Jerome Tang
« Reply #165 on: January 14, 2025, 10:03:33 PM »
Totally litting we lost by giving up an offensive rebound.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55873
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: It’s time to have a conversation about Jerome Tang
« Reply #166 on: January 14, 2025, 10:05:02 PM »
pretty incredible finish by both teams




Offline Kid In the Hall

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1413
    • View Profile
Re: It’s time to have a conversation about Jerome Tang
« Reply #167 on: January 14, 2025, 10:10:25 PM »
I still haven't made up my mind which is worse - the fact that this team full of upperclassmen is so soft/mentally weak/low b-ball IQ or the fact that this coaching staff can't figure out how to prevent them from being that way.

Our possessions the last 5 minutes of the game (when Tech was begging us to take the W):

05:14   KState   - Missed 3PT jumper by KState #33 hawkins, coleman
04:54   KState   - Missed 3PT jumper by KState #0 mcdaniel, dug
04:02   KState   - Missed 3PT jumper by KState #10 castillo, david
03:30   KState   - Turnover by KState #33 hawkins, coleman
02:42   KState   - Missed 3PT jumper by KState #11 hausen, brendan
01:57   KState   - Turnover by KState #10 castillo, david
01:15   KState   - Missed layup by KState #10 castillo, david
00:49   KState   - Missed 3PT jumper by KState #33 hawkins, coleman
00:12   KState   - Missed 3PT jumper by KState #10 castillo, david
00:08   KState   - Offensive rebound by KState #33 hawkins, coleman
00:06   KState   - Missed layup by KState #33 hawkins, coleman

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55873
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: It’s time to have a conversation about Jerome Tang
« Reply #168 on: January 14, 2025, 10:13:09 PM »
Most of the 3s in that stretch were pretty decent shots. The turnovers would be unfathomably bad for a high school team

Offline KST8FAN

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3495
    • View Profile
Re: It’s time to have a conversation about Jerome Tang
« Reply #169 on: January 14, 2025, 10:15:32 PM »
pretty incredible finish by both teams


LoL.  I had to screen shot that too.  5 min drought only down 2.


Tom

Sent from my SM-S916U using Tapatalk


Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55873
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: It’s time to have a conversation about Jerome Tang
« Reply #170 on: January 14, 2025, 10:17:42 PM »
pretty incredible finish by both teams


LoL.  I had to screen shot that too.  5 min drought only down 2.


Tom

Sent from my SM-S916U using Tapatalk

5 minute drought by BOTH TEAMS

Offline Kid In the Hall

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1413
    • View Profile
Re: It’s time to have a conversation about Jerome Tang
« Reply #171 on: January 14, 2025, 10:18:08 PM »
Most of the 3s in that stretch were pretty decent shots. The turnovers would be unfathomably bad for a high school team

Castillo shooting is never a good shot at this point.

And after the first two or three didn't go down, have some situational awareness and drive the ball.

We scored 3 effing points in the last 9 minutes of this basketball game.

Good shot, bad shot, whatever - that's a colossally poor performance by the coaches and the players. It's just so completely inept.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55873
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: It’s time to have a conversation about Jerome Tang
« Reply #172 on: January 14, 2025, 10:23:38 PM »
Most of the 3s in that stretch were pretty decent shots. The turnovers would be unfathomably bad for a high school team

Castillo shooting is never a good shot at this point.

And after the first two or three didn't go down, have some situational awareness and drive the ball.

We scored 4 effing points in the last 9 minutes of this basketball game.

Good shot, bad shot, whatever - that's a colossally poor performance by the coaches and the players. It's just so completely inept.

Yeah obviously the results stink but man with some of those turnovers that are just like an inability to dribble or complete a pass I don't know what you expect anyone to do other than blow up the roster

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55873
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: It’s time to have a conversation about Jerome Tang
« Reply #173 on: January 14, 2025, 10:27:49 PM »
 IMO this team's biggest problem on offense is you got a bunch of guys afraid to attack in any way so like any decent look at a three feels like a major win

Offline BIG APPLE CAT

  • smelly poor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7600
  • slide rule enthusiast
    • View Profile
Re: It’s time to have a conversation about Jerome Tang
« Reply #174 on: January 14, 2025, 10:29:06 PM »
We’re going to need as many moral victories as we can get this year so keep em coming