Author Topic: Rank the new Big 12  (Read 9450 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline GregKSU1027

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3759
  • Cats, man
    • View Profile
Re: Rank the new Big 12
« Reply #100 on: September 24, 2023, 11:06:31 AM »
Maybe I'm just not gE enough and I'm doing it wrong but don't you want your conference to be filled with a bunch of teams you don't like?

The way all fans have gotten during realignment makes it hard to mock rednecks for sec-sec-sec.

We don't get to form a gang with the teams in our conference and go fight the other conferences/gangs.
I hate all teams in our conference that aren't the KSU Cats. In the words of Robert Muldoon "They should all be destroyed"
“He plays for Kansas State. He doesn't play for Will Howard University." -Chris Klieman 10/14/2023

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Rank the new Big 12
« Reply #101 on: September 24, 2023, 12:22:59 PM »
That tech game was one of the hardest games left on WVU's schedule. If I were a fan I'd be pissed, it's really obvious they aren't going anywhere but he's going to squeeze a bowl game out of this team. It's post Jake Waters LHC Bill Snyder.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: Rank the new Big 12
« Reply #102 on: September 25, 2023, 11:10:06 AM »
That tech game was one of the hardest games left on WVU's schedule. If I were a fan I'd be pissed, it's really obvious they aren't going anywhere but he's going to squeeze a bowl game out of this team. It's post Jake Waters LHC Bill Snyder.

Yeah, they probably go 4-4 down the stretch to finish 7-5.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29284
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: Rank the new Big 12
« Reply #103 on: September 25, 2023, 12:06:17 PM »
That Mizzou game left such a bad taste in my mouth that it’s going to take probably 4 more wins in a row to cleanse my palate. Luckily, we will probably get them.

Offline cfbandyman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9386
  • To da 'ville.
    • View Profile
Re: Rank the new Big 12
« Reply #104 on: September 25, 2023, 12:14:51 PM »
That Mizzou game left such a bad taste in my mouth that it’s going to take probably 4 more wins in a row to cleanse my palate. Luckily, we will probably get them.

Agree with this entire statement, being 4-0 would feel so different. Next 4 are very winnable
A&M Style: 1/19/13 Co-Champion of THE ED's College Basketball Challenge

The art of the deal with it poors

OG Elon hater with a tesla


Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22252
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: Rank the new Big 12
« Reply #105 on: September 25, 2023, 12:58:57 PM »
That tech game was one of the hardest games left on WVU's schedule. If I were a fan I'd be pissed, it's really obvious they aren't going anywhere but he's going to squeeze a bowl game out of this team. It's post Jake Waters LHC Bill Snyder.
Bowl game or not, Neal Brown likely was going to retain his job after this year.  His buyout is still $13m even after this season.


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline nicname

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15862
  • Deal with it.
    • View Profile
Re: Rank the new Big 12
« Reply #106 on: September 30, 2023, 09:36:14 PM »
Aside from KSU, Utah and CU under Prime, this conference is poop. We should be in the ccg at least every other year.
If there was a gif of nicname thwarting the attempted-flag-taker and then gesturing him to suck it, followed by motioning for all of Hilton Shelter to boo him louder, it'd be better than that auburn gif.

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30445
    • View Profile
Re: Rank the new Big 12
« Reply #107 on: September 30, 2023, 09:51:39 PM »
Aside from KSU, Utah and CU under Prime, this conference is poop. We should be in the ccg at least every other year.

TCU, Baylor, TTU all have the resources and fan support to be contenders.  Once OSU rids themselves of Gundy they can be solid again too.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19428
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: Rank the new Big 12
« Reply #108 on: September 30, 2023, 10:50:40 PM »
Ha ha eff TCU.  They seem like a dirty team, they hurt a lot of players.

Offline TheProdigiousTalent

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 433
    • View Profile
Re: Rank the new Big 12
« Reply #109 on: September 30, 2023, 11:06:04 PM »
Aside from KSU, Utah and CU under Prime, this conference is poop. We should be in the ccg at least every other year.

TCU, Baylor, TTU all have the resources and fan support to be contenders.  Once OSU rids themselves of Gundy they can be solid again too.
Seems to me that Mike Gundy is the best thing not named Boone Pickens to happen to OSU football since the invention of the Apple IIe.  Weird take.  "Get rid of that one exceptionally successful head coach, you guys, and the sky's the limit!"

Maybe Gundy's spray tan or his politics annoy you.  Get over it, and stop giving moustache aggie bad advice.

Offline cfbandyman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9386
  • To da 'ville.
    • View Profile
Re: Rank the new Big 12
« Reply #110 on: September 30, 2023, 11:15:04 PM »
Week 5 overreactions.

S tier (will be in Jerry World)
Tejas, was interesting there for a bit, but they walked away with an easy win over blue wings
OU, was interesting also for a bit, but some pick 6s made it too easy

A tier (still good and could be there)
K-State, sleepycat.gif
West Virginia, holy crap, are they actually a decent team? Another solid win.

B tier (looked good but still iffy long term)
TCU, tough loss, but WVU is kinda legit
BYU, first Big 12 win, even if it's not really a big 12 win. But they're a solid team
KU, I get it, Texas is good, and really this is more cause they couldn't keep it close, tough loss.

C tier (either better than I thought or worse than I thought)
No one this week

D tier (going to be a long season)
Texas Tech, a win, but Houston made that too interesting for too long, no movement yet
Baylor, you get a bump for that crazy comeback, but ass is there
Cincy, not a bad game, but still not looking great now
UCF, I mean, wow, how do you do that, biggest drop of the week
Iowa State, I still gotta bit of a soft spot I guess, not a good performance, they will have to keep themselves from F tier if not careful

F tier (complete ass)
Houston, keep dat ass going
Oklahoma State, keep dat ass going on bye week
A&M Style: 1/19/13 Co-Champion of THE ED's College Basketball Challenge

The art of the deal with it poors

OG Elon hater with a tesla


Offline nicname

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15862
  • Deal with it.
    • View Profile
Re: Rank the new Big 12
« Reply #111 on: September 30, 2023, 11:15:26 PM »
Sonny Dykes will run TCU into the ground if they don’t run him out of town quick.
If there was a gif of nicname thwarting the attempted-flag-taker and then gesturing him to suck it, followed by motioning for all of Hilton Shelter to boo him louder, it'd be better than that auburn gif.

Offline cfbandyman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9386
  • To da 'ville.
    • View Profile
Re: Rank the new Big 12
« Reply #112 on: September 30, 2023, 11:18:07 PM »
Aside from KSU, Utah and CU under Prime, this conference is poop. We should be in the ccg at least every other year.

I tend to agree, there really though isn't much to say why not us for the foreseeable future
A&M Style: 1/19/13 Co-Champion of THE ED's College Basketball Challenge

The art of the deal with it poors

OG Elon hater with a tesla


Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Rank the new Big 12
« Reply #113 on: October 01, 2023, 09:44:28 AM »
Aside from KSU, Utah and CU under Prime, this conference is poop. We should be in the ccg at least every other year.

What the hell has Colorado done to be included on that list? KU is a better program, by miles right now.

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 21466
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: Rank the new Big 12
« Reply #114 on: October 01, 2023, 11:21:34 AM »
You tell 'em, MIR!

Offline nicname

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15862
  • Deal with it.
    • View Profile
Re: Rank the new Big 12
« Reply #115 on: October 01, 2023, 11:24:35 AM »
Aside from KSU, Utah and CU under Prime, this conference is poop. We should be in the ccg at least every other year.

What the hell has Colorado done to be included on that list? KU is a better program, by miles :D right now.

I think all the signs are there that the Primes will continue to rise until Deion moves on. Don’t think it will be more than 5 years total, but they will get dudes on dudes imo. KU and the PrimeBuffs are about equal rn iyam. I’m more sold on Prime/CU than Lance/KU.



If there was a gif of nicname thwarting the attempted-flag-taker and then gesturing him to suck it, followed by motioning for all of Hilton Shelter to boo him louder, it'd be better than that auburn gif.

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30445
    • View Profile
Re: Rank the new Big 12
« Reply #116 on: October 01, 2023, 11:30:25 AM »
UCF is going to continue to stack talent. They have 9(!) 4 star recruits in the 2024 class. 
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7639
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Rank the new Big 12
« Reply #117 on: October 01, 2023, 12:33:49 PM »
UCF is going to continue to stack talent. They have 9(!) 4 star recruits in the 2024 class.

For sure. Now that they're a P4 program, Florida talent will seriously consider their program over UF, Miami, and FSU.

Offline Katpappy

  • I got my eye on you
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12817
  • Party on gE
    • View Profile
Re: Rank the new Big 12
« Reply #118 on: October 01, 2023, 03:29:25 PM »
Let this season be a forebearer to the new PAC 4 next season.   The 4 new teams have a total of 1 win so far, and the only win was when they played each other.  The hateful 8 won't lay down.  Also, I got this overwhelming feeling that neither Texas nor OU will be in the CCG.
Hot time in Kat town tonight.

Offline nicname

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15862
  • Deal with it.
    • View Profile
Re: Rank the new Big 12
« Reply #119 on: October 01, 2023, 07:39:18 PM »
Let this season be a forebearer to the new PAC 4 next season.   The 4 new teams have a total of 1 win so far, and the only win was when they played each other.  The hateful 8 won't lay down.  Also, I got this overwhelming feeling that neither Texas nor OU will be in the CCG.

Brah, our very own ksu cats are the only thing standing in the way of OUT flipping all of us the double bird otw out of here and leaving every new-new B12 team feeling like chumps.
« Last Edit: October 01, 2023, 09:41:15 PM by nicname »
If there was a gif of nicname thwarting the attempted-flag-taker and then gesturing him to suck it, followed by motioning for all of Hilton Shelter to boo him louder, it'd be better than that auburn gif.

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 21466
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: Rank the new Big 12
« Reply #120 on: October 01, 2023, 08:12:54 PM »
O/UT is coming after YOU. The 'cats are just standing in the way.

Offline cfbandyman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9386
  • To da 'ville.
    • View Profile
Re: Rank the new Big 12
« Reply #121 on: October 01, 2023, 08:41:05 PM »
They will get this, no doubt (may cats champs) the question is how many wins
A&M Style: 1/19/13 Co-Champion of THE ED's College Basketball Challenge

The art of the deal with it poors

OG Elon hater with a tesla


Offline cfbandyman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9386
  • To da 'ville.
    • View Profile
Re: Rank the new Big 12
« Reply #122 on: October 08, 2023, 12:04:48 PM »
Week 6 overreactions.

S tier (will be in Jerry World)
OU, big win, crazy game, best in the league rn
Tejas, no shame in a crazy game, but loss is a loss

A tier (still good and could be there)
West Virginia, sleepymountaineer.gif
KU, legit good, great win for them

B tier (looked good but still iffy long term)
BYU, sleepymormon.gif

C tier (either better than I thought or worse than I thought)
K-State, horribly game, and yet still in it. But horrible game, going to have to figure it out vs a TT turning it around finally.
Texas Tech, a win, and Baylor is ass, but righting the ship
Iowa State, big win vs TCU, they got a shot of going bowling
TCU, if they aren't careful they will fall to d-tier. They just don't have it. But a ton of t-rex's is hard to overcome tbh.

D tier (going to be a long season)
Cincy, sleepybearcat.gif
Oklahoma State, big win, outplayed the cats, but will it stick?

F tier (complete ass)
Houston, keep dat ass going while sleepycougar.gif
Baylor, back to ass
UCF, what a fall, they are ass
A&M Style: 1/19/13 Co-Champion of THE ED's College Basketball Challenge

The art of the deal with it poors

OG Elon hater with a tesla


Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 46514
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: Rank the new Big 12
« Reply #123 on: October 08, 2023, 12:52:55 PM »
ucf belongs no lower than d tier


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline cfbandyman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9386
  • To da 'ville.
    • View Profile
Re: Rank the new Big 12
« Reply #124 on: October 16, 2023, 04:52:30 AM »
Week 6 overreactions.

S tier (will be in Jerry World)
OU, sleepydirtburglar.gif
Tejas, sleepybevo.gif

A tier (still good and could be there)
None this week

B tier (looked good but still iffy long term)
K-State, defense had some moments, but wow is Avery good. Hard to argue this team when the offense clicks. Turning around TCU next
KU, and the regression came, is OSU actual not that bad? Is ku good? They seem to fade in games. OU awaits
Iowa State, they are a decent team, no other way to say it. They should be bowling, maybe even 7 wins.

C tier (either better than I thought or worse than I thought)
TCU, no movement, but a very impressive win.
OSU, turns out it did stick, and that was an impressive win.
WVU, had to fall a lot, it was Houston.

D tier (going to be a long season)
BYU, what an ass whooping, careful or they maybe ass
Houston, probably shouldn't get out of ass, but a win is a win and you get out the doghouse
Texas Tech, I get it was a freshman QB, but the other team had one too and that went from a close game to a laugher.

F tier (complete ass)
Cincy, I think it's time to face it they are ass, ISU is actual a decent team, but wow
Baylor, sleepybear.gif
UCF, sleepyknight.gif
A&M Style: 1/19/13 Co-Champion of THE ED's College Basketball Challenge

The art of the deal with it poors

OG Elon hater with a tesla