0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Just a rinse repeat of 16. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote from: Pete on November 06, 2024, 06:30:33 AMQuoteThe Supreme Court has not specifically interpreted the Twenty-Second Amendment to determine whether a president is prohibited from serving more than two terms in total or just two consecutive terms. The amendment clearly states that no person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, but it does not explicitly address non-consecutive terms. As such, there is no Supreme Court ruling clarifying this aspect, and the general understanding remains that a president cannot serve more than two terms in total.I mean they'll try but the verbage is QuoteSection 1. No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.That first line is pretty damn cut and dry, regardless of consecutiveness. But hell why trust the supreme Court to agree with that.
QuoteThe Supreme Court has not specifically interpreted the Twenty-Second Amendment to determine whether a president is prohibited from serving more than two terms in total or just two consecutive terms. The amendment clearly states that no person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, but it does not explicitly address non-consecutive terms. As such, there is no Supreme Court ruling clarifying this aspect, and the general understanding remains that a president cannot serve more than two terms in total.
The Supreme Court has not specifically interpreted the Twenty-Second Amendment to determine whether a president is prohibited from serving more than two terms in total or just two consecutive terms. The amendment clearly states that no person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, but it does not explicitly address non-consecutive terms. As such, there is no Supreme Court ruling clarifying this aspect, and the general understanding remains that a president cannot serve more than two terms in total.
Section 1. No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.
Yea he's been pretty clear he just trusted the political establishment of the Republican Party to tell him who to appoint to most of the offices. That isn't going to happen this time.
Quote from: wetwillie on November 06, 2024, 07:03:52 AMYea he's been pretty clear he just trusted the political establishment of the Republican Party to tell him who to appoint to most of the offices. That isn't going to happen this time.This is a tough one to predict for me. Just like 2016, this Trump has no desire to push an agenda, he just wants power and to be adored. Last time he listened to the Republican establishment on how to get there. This time he is the establishment.
Quote from: catastrophe on November 06, 2024, 07:24:22 AMQuote from: wetwillie on November 06, 2024, 07:03:52 AMYea he's been pretty clear he just trusted the political establishment of the Republican Party to tell him who to appoint to most of the offices. That isn't going to happen this time.This is a tough one to predict for me. Just like 2016, this Trump has no desire to push an agenda, he just wants power and to be adored. Last time he listened to the Republican establishment on how to get there. This time he is the establishment.Agree with this. He never really wanted to be president. He just wanted to be adored and powerful. He has no idea how to run or work with in government and has/had zero interest in learning. Everyone that has worked with him prior either hates him or has been convicted of something. The people he is going to bring with him this time are there to say yes and/or get rich. Aside from RFK who is there to kill us all, but I guess that is a different problem.
Elon style population worriers vs RFK OTSS-ers?
Quote from: Cire on November 06, 2024, 06:20:53 AMJust a rinse repeat of 16. Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkEh you could argue 2016 was a fluke. This wasn't a fluke, it was a real shift.
Quote from: michigancat on November 06, 2024, 06:27:20 AMQuote from: Cire on November 06, 2024, 06:20:53 AMJust a rinse repeat of 16. Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkEh you could argue 2016 was a fluke. This wasn't a fluke, it was a real shift.Yeah the shift towards trump from Latinos is pretty incredible
Quote from: mocat on November 06, 2024, 07:39:02 AMQuote from: michigancat on November 06, 2024, 06:27:20 AMQuote from: Cire on November 06, 2024, 06:20:53 AMJust a rinse repeat of 16. Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkEh you could argue 2016 was a fluke. This wasn't a fluke, it was a real shift.Yeah the shift towards trump from Latinos is pretty incredibleWhat issues drive that?
I guess one Peggy Pos is that he won't have to do another January 6.When the autopsy is done on all this, I guess the blame will fall at Sleepy Joe's feet for not stepping down from the Interim Dictator role sooner?
Quote from: Pete on November 06, 2024, 07:39:55 AMQuote from: mocat on November 06, 2024, 07:39:02 AMQuote from: michigancat on November 06, 2024, 06:27:20 AMQuote from: Cire on November 06, 2024, 06:20:53 AMJust a rinse repeat of 16. Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkEh you could argue 2016 was a fluke. This wasn't a fluke, it was a real shift.Yeah the shift towards trump from Latinos is pretty incredibleWhat issues drive that?The entire R platform is to convince people that they are going to make it worse for "other people" than they have it. It doesn't really matter who the "other" people are. It doesn't even matter that their own lives won't be noticeably better, it just matters that others will have it worse.
Quote from: Stupid Fitz on November 06, 2024, 07:45:12 AMQuote from: Pete on November 06, 2024, 07:39:55 AMQuote from: mocat on November 06, 2024, 07:39:02 AMQuote from: michigancat on November 06, 2024, 06:27:20 AMQuote from: Cire on November 06, 2024, 06:20:53 AMJust a rinse repeat of 16. Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkEh you could argue 2016 was a fluke. This wasn't a fluke, it was a real shift.Yeah the shift towards trump from Latinos is pretty incredibleWhat issues drive that?The entire R platform is to convince people that they are going to make it worse for "other people" than they have it. It doesn't really matter who the "other" people are. It doesn't even matter that their own lives won't be noticeably better, it just matters that others will have it worse.That doesn't explain a double digit shift from 2020
Quote from: cfbandyman on November 06, 2024, 06:44:46 AMQuote from: Pete on November 06, 2024, 06:30:33 AMQuoteThe Supreme Court has not specifically interpreted the Twenty-Second Amendment to determine whether a president is prohibited from serving more than two terms in total or just two consecutive terms. The amendment clearly states that no person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, but it does not explicitly address non-consecutive terms. As such, there is no Supreme Court ruling clarifying this aspect, and the general understanding remains that a president cannot serve more than two terms in total.I mean they'll try but the verbage is QuoteSection 1. No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.That first line is pretty damn cut and dry, regardless of consecutiveness. But hell why trust the supreme Court to agree with that.Well that ones easy if he just declares an emergency and suspends future elections.
Quote from: mocat on November 06, 2024, 07:49:11 AMQuote from: Stupid Fitz on November 06, 2024, 07:45:12 AMQuote from: Pete on November 06, 2024, 07:39:55 AMQuote from: mocat on November 06, 2024, 07:39:02 AMQuote from: michigancat on November 06, 2024, 06:27:20 AMQuote from: Cire on November 06, 2024, 06:20:53 AMJust a rinse repeat of 16. Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkEh you could argue 2016 was a fluke. This wasn't a fluke, it was a real shift.Yeah the shift towards trump from Latinos is pretty incredibleWhat issues drive that?The entire R platform is to convince people that they are going to make it worse for "other people" than they have it. It doesn't really matter who the "other" people are. It doesn't even matter that their own lives won't be noticeably better, it just matters that others will have it worse.That doesn't explain a double digit shift from 2020Last night they were emphasizing that a big component of the demographic shifts in blacks and Latinos was among males specifically. The difference between now and 2020 is that the Democratic candidate (1) was not connected to Obama, and (2) was a woman.