That's fine no need to make it super long. Like I get that point of view but even the reason he was in that position was due to a democratic process even legitimizing him enough.
Yes you can argue what it means to be a democracy there, and I can see your point that it wasn't like the country voted to have enough nazis to make it be that way directly and of course what he did after was undemocratic AF but the Reichstag parties coalition voted on the enabling power (and still did every 4 years after but obv only they were the only legit party), which was still pretty democratic (or at least following the results of a vote, and not all were nazis). Hell all parliamentary groups do that to this day to make a coalition. They very effectively used the tools given to them.
I guess in my opinion, they used the guise of the democracy they were in to legitimize themselves, and they secured enough votes in the reichstag to give those powers by using not only fear and intimidation, but also making concessions and dealmaking to get his way.
