2024 Presidential Race

[Dugout DickStone]

Besides IVF what other treatments should
Be entirely free?

1.  Lap band
2.  BBL
3.  Abortion

Others?

[Stupid Fitz]

Besides IVF what other treatments should
Be entirely free?

1.  Lap band
2.  BBL
3.  Abortion

Others?

being sick???

[Dugout DickStone]

Agreed.  I was just thinking now that maga wants taxpayer funded care that kills babies there are some new ones on the table

[bucket]

You guys already happily voted for a racist war monger who by numerous accounts and evidence provided by his own family was selling access across the globe to the tune of $30 million and counting.  Only avoiding impeachment by not running again and a DOJ that purposely slow rolled the process. Enabled by one of the biggest disinformation campaigns in modern world history.

 

[sonofdaxjones]

When you're embarrassed AF that the "Border Czar" (rewrite notwithstanding) was and is an utter failure, then you search for just about anything trying to deflect away from said failure.

This is the life and times of #blueanongE

Just looking forward to the next pre-recorded interview (and likely edited) with the emotional support whack-a-doo Veep candidate holding her hand.

Good point. We should def put an obese senior citizen that lies non stop, can't talk in complete sentences and/or do grade school math in charge!!!!

Can't defend your candidate?  . . . make it about Don Trump 

That is like part of choosing who to vote for? Also, who said she was my candidate? Also, on top of being an obese senior citizen in obvious cognitive decline, he's also a convicted sexual assaulter and felon.

You guys already happily voted for a racist war monger who by numerous accounts and evidence provided by his own family was selling access across the globe to the tune of $30 million and counting.  Only avoiding impeachment by not running again and a DOJ that purposely slow rolled the process. Enabled by one of the biggest disinformation campaigns in modern world history.

This on top of voting for another racist war monger and sexual predator facilitator in 2016 who was also selling/pre-selling access to the SOS/POTUS across the globe to the tune of tens of millions of dollars.

But that has virtually nothing to do with the repeated failures of your POTUS candidate in her role as VPOTUS.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I would hope that any President or candidate would be convicted of and serve significant time for participating in any of those activities regardless of political affiliation.

Now you go.....

Don Trump couldn’t sell access. He wasn’t in office.

But again, that has nothing to do with the failings of VPOTUS Harris.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Narrator....he didn't go

Again, you know the record of your candidate blows every level of ass when it comes to the topic I brought up, so the only thing you’ve got is to try to somehow deflect back on to Don Trump, something wholly unrelated to the topic.

Very #onbrand of you and the rest of #blueanongE




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Stupid Fitz]

You guys already happily voted for a racist war monger who by numerous accounts and evidence provided by his own family was selling access across the globe to the tune of $30 million and counting.  Only avoiding impeachment by not running again and a DOJ that purposely slow rolled the process. Enabled by one of the biggest disinformation campaigns in modern world history.

 

Didn't the R's threaten and like try and impeach him several times only to never really have any evidence other than "internet things" that even current R's wouldn't get behind and hold a vote for? What's stopping them now? Why is there always this imaginary road block or excuse every single time.

[Stupid Fitz]

When you're embarrassed AF that the "Border Czar" (rewrite notwithstanding) was and is an utter failure, then you search for just about anything trying to deflect away from said failure.

This is the life and times of #blueanongE

Just looking forward to the next pre-recorded interview (and likely edited) with the emotional support whack-a-doo Veep candidate holding her hand.

Good point. We should def put an obese senior citizen that lies non stop, can't talk in complete sentences and/or do grade school math in charge!!!!

Can't defend your candidate?  . . . make it about Don Trump 

That is like part of choosing who to vote for? Also, who said she was my candidate? Also, on top of being an obese senior citizen in obvious cognitive decline, he's also a convicted sexual assaulter and felon.

You guys already happily voted for a racist war monger who by numerous accounts and evidence provided by his own family was selling access across the globe to the tune of $30 million and counting.  Only avoiding impeachment by not running again and a DOJ that purposely slow rolled the process. Enabled by one of the biggest disinformation campaigns in modern world history.

This on top of voting for another racist war monger and sexual predator facilitator in 2016 who was also selling/pre-selling access to the SOS/POTUS across the globe to the tune of tens of millions of dollars.

But that has virtually nothing to do with the repeated failures of your POTUS candidate in her role as VPOTUS.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I would hope that any President or candidate would be convicted of and serve significant time for participating in any of those activities regardless of political affiliation.

Now you go.....

Don Trump couldn’t sell access. He wasn’t in office.

But again, that has nothing to do with the failings of VPOTUS Harris.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Narrator....he didn't go

Again, you know the record of your candidate blows every level of ass when it comes to the topic I brought up, so the only thing you’ve got is to try to somehow deflect back on to Don Trump, something wholly unrelated to the topic.

Very #onbrand of you and the rest of #blueanongE




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

who is my candidate?

[sonofdaxjones]

When you're embarrassed AF that the "Border Czar" (rewrite notwithstanding) was and is an utter failure, then you search for just about anything trying to deflect away from said failure.

This is the life and times of #blueanongE

Just looking forward to the next pre-recorded interview (and likely edited) with the emotional support whack-a-doo Veep candidate holding her hand.

Good point. We should def put an obese senior citizen that lies non stop, can't talk in complete sentences and/or do grade school math in charge!!!!

Can't defend your candidate?  . . . make it about Don Trump 

That is like part of choosing who to vote for? Also, who said she was my candidate? Also, on top of being an obese senior citizen in obvious cognitive decline, he's also a convicted sexual assaulter and felon.

You guys already happily voted for a racist war monger who by numerous accounts and evidence provided by his own family was selling access across the globe to the tune of $30 million and counting.  Only avoiding impeachment by not running again and a DOJ that purposely slow rolled the process. Enabled by one of the biggest disinformation campaigns in modern world history.

This on top of voting for another racist war monger and sexual predator facilitator in 2016 who was also selling/pre-selling access to the SOS/POTUS across the globe to the tune of tens of millions of dollars.

But that has virtually nothing to do with the repeated failures of your POTUS candidate in her role as VPOTUS.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I would hope that any President or candidate would be convicted of and serve significant time for participating in any of those activities regardless of political affiliation.

Now you go.....

Don Trump couldn’t sell access. He wasn’t in office.

But again, that has nothing to do with the failings of VPOTUS Harris.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Narrator....he didn't go

Again, you know the record of your candidate blows every level of ass when it comes to the topic I brought up, so the only thing you’ve got is to try to somehow deflect back on to Don Trump, something wholly unrelated to the topic.

Very #onbrand of you and the rest of #blueanongE




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

who is my candidate?

  Just stop with this bullshit

[sonofdaxjones]

You guys already happily voted for a racist war monger who by numerous accounts and evidence provided by his own family was selling access across the globe to the tune of $30 million and counting.  Only avoiding impeachment by not running again and a DOJ that purposely slow rolled the process. Enabled by one of the biggest disinformation campaigns in modern world history.

 

Didn't the R's threaten and like try and impeach him several times only to never really have any evidence other than "internet things" that even current R's wouldn't get behind and hold a vote for? What's stopping them now? Why is there always this imaginary road block or excuse every single time.

Unlike #blueanon's mindset, what is the worth of impeaching a POTUS who is a mentally incapacitated old man who already checked out and will only be in office for a few more months? (we'll leave the 3.5 years of gaslighting on that topic for another time) They also know that unlike #blueanon, Pubs don't get their rocks off on meaningless show trials.

"all the Internet stuff" . . . you mean like a laptop which was deemed real by our own FBI which essentially laid out the entire playbook of The Grifters Biden? That "Internet stuff"? 

Unlike #blueanon who gets mad about phone calls and gets easily manipulated by Russian intelligence feeding a former British intelligence officer mis-information, who in turn sells that to a political campaign . . . only proving that the whole lot are the easiest marks on the planet, but somehow still managed to make continuous proclamations of having evidence of Trump-Russian COLUSION and yet producing nothing. 

Impeachment processes are traditionally protracted and thorough, and not hyper-partisan show trials.

But again, this has virtually nothing to do with the failures of Kamala Harris as "border czar"

But I'll happily keep  at your deflection.

[Stupid Fitz]

You guys already happily voted for a racist war monger who by numerous accounts and evidence provided by his own family was selling access across the globe to the tune of $30 million and counting.  Only avoiding impeachment by not running again and a DOJ that purposely slow rolled the process. Enabled by one of the biggest disinformation campaigns in modern world history.

 

Didn't the R's threaten and like try and impeach him several times only to never really have any evidence other than "internet things" that even current R's wouldn't get behind and hold a vote for? What's stopping them now? Why is there always this imaginary road block or excuse every single time.

Unlike #blueanon's mindset, what is the worth of impeaching a POTUS who is a mentally incapacitated old man who already checked out and will only be in office for a few more months? (we'll leave the 3.5 years of gaslighting on that topic for another time) They also know that unlike #blueanon, Pubs don't get their rocks off on meaningless show trials.

"all the Internet stuff" . . . you mean like a laptop which was deemed real by our own FBI which essentially laid out the entire playbook of The Grifters Biden? That "Internet stuff"? 

Unlike #blueanon who gets mad about phone calls and gets easily manipulated by Russian intelligence feeding a former British intelligence officer mis-information, who in turn sells that to a political campaign . . . only proving that the whole lot are the easiest marks on the planet, but somehow still managed to make continuous proclamations of having evidence of Trump-Russian COLUSION and yet producing nothing. 

Impeachment processes are traditionally protracted and thorough, and not hyper-partisan show trials.

But again, this has virtually nothing to do with the failures of Kamala Harris as "border czar"

But I'll happily keep  at your deflection.

haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Holy crap. Have a real one Dax. Haaaaaaaa

[star seed 7]

He's a crazy person

[Stupid Fitz]

He's a crazy person

that might be the craziest crap he's ever said on this here bbs. Crazy and oblivious is the ultimate cult combo. Its perfect.

[sonofdaxjones]

You guys already happily voted for a racist war monger who by numerous accounts and evidence provided by his own family was selling access across the globe to the tune of $30 million and counting.  Only avoiding impeachment by not running again and a DOJ that purposely slow rolled the process. Enabled by one of the biggest disinformation campaigns in modern world history.

 

Didn't the R's threaten and like try and impeach him several times only to never really have any evidence other than "internet things" that even current R's wouldn't get behind and hold a vote for? What's stopping them now? Why is there always this imaginary road block or excuse every single time.

Unlike #blueanon's mindset, what is the worth of impeaching a POTUS who is a mentally incapacitated old man who already checked out and will only be in office for a few more months? (we'll leave the 3.5 years of gaslighting on that topic for another time) They also know that unlike #blueanon, Pubs don't get their rocks off on meaningless show trials.

"all the Internet stuff" . . . you mean like a laptop which was deemed real by our own FBI which essentially laid out the entire playbook of The Grifters Biden? That "Internet stuff"? 

Unlike #blueanon who gets mad about phone calls and gets easily manipulated by Russian intelligence feeding a former British intelligence officer mis-information, who in turn sells that to a political campaign . . . only proving that the whole lot are the easiest marks on the planet, but somehow still managed to make continuous proclamations of having evidence of Trump-Russian COLUSION and yet producing nothing. 

Impeachment processes are traditionally protracted and thorough, and not hyper-partisan show trials.

But again, this has virtually nothing to do with the failures of Kamala Harris as "border czar"

But I'll happily keep  at your deflection.

haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Holy crap. Have a real one Dax. Haaaaaaaa

All of this because you're too embarrassed to discuss your candidates track record.

Sad 

[sonofdaxjones]

He's a crazy person

that might be the craziest crap he's ever said on this here bbs. Crazy and oblivious is the ultimate cult combo. Its perfect.

StalkerBot (and now you) is the biggest deflectocon on this board.

I don't blame you guys. When your part of a movement who will believe every insane anti-Pub thing that your leadership puts out there.

Remember when you guys got all horned up when Schumer and Pelosi marched the impeachment papers between houses?   

This whole exercise because SF is embarrassed by Kamala 

[Kat Kid]

You guys already happily voted for a racist war monger who by numerous accounts and evidence provided by his own family was selling access across the globe to the tune of $30 million and counting.  Only avoiding impeachment by not running again and a DOJ that purposely slow rolled the process. Enabled by one of the biggest disinformation campaigns in modern world history.

 

Didn't the R's threaten and like try and impeach him several times only to never really have any evidence other than "internet things" that even current R's wouldn't get behind and hold a vote for? What's stopping them now? Why is there always this imaginary road block or excuse every single time.

Unlike #blueanon's mindset, what is the worth of impeaching a POTUS who is a mentally incapacitated old man who already checked out and will only be in office for a few more months? (we'll leave the 3.5 years of gaslighting on that topic for another time) They also know that unlike #blueanon, Pubs don't get their rocks off on meaningless show trials.

"all the Internet stuff" . . . you mean like a laptop which was deemed real by our own FBI which essentially laid out the entire playbook of The Grifters Biden? That "Internet stuff"? 

Unlike #blueanon who gets mad about phone calls and gets easily manipulated by Russian intelligence feeding a former British intelligence officer mis-information, who in turn sells that to a political campaign . . . only proving that the whole lot are the easiest marks on the planet, but somehow still managed to make continuous proclamations of having evidence of Trump-Russian COLUSION and yet producing nothing. 

Impeachment processes are traditionally protracted and thorough, and not hyper-partisan show trials.

But again, this has virtually nothing to do with the failures of Kamala Harris as "border czar"

But I'll happily keep  at your deflection.

haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Holy crap. Have a real one Dax. Haaaaaaaa

All of this because you're too embarrassed to discuss your candidates track record.

Sad 

[Stevesie60]

When you're embarrassed AF that the "Border Czar" (rewrite notwithstanding) was and is an utter failure, then you search for just about anything trying to deflect away from said failure.

This is the life and times of #blueanongE

Just looking forward to the next pre-recorded interview (and likely edited) with the emotional support whack-a-doo Veep candidate holding her hand.

Good point. We should def put an obese senior citizen that lies non stop, can't talk in complete sentences and/or do grade school math in charge!!!!

Can't defend your candidate?  . . . make it about Don Trump 

dax I hope we can agree that I'm not combative with you so hopefully you can tell this is an honest inquiry. You're mocking someone for only attacking the opposing candidate, not pointing out the positives of their own. So I ask, what are the positives that Trump has done/do you expect him to do if he is elected?

[sonofdaxjones]

You guys already happily voted for a racist war monger who by numerous accounts and evidence provided by his own family was selling access across the globe to the tune of $30 million and counting.  Only avoiding impeachment by not running again and a DOJ that purposely slow rolled the process. Enabled by one of the biggest disinformation campaigns in modern world history.

 

Didn't the R's threaten and like try and impeach him several times only to never really have any evidence other than "internet things" that even current R's wouldn't get behind and hold a vote for? What's stopping them now? Why is there always this imaginary road block or excuse every single time.

Unlike #blueanon's mindset, what is the worth of impeaching a POTUS who is a mentally incapacitated old man who already checked out and will only be in office for a few more months? (we'll leave the 3.5 years of gaslighting on that topic for another time) They also know that unlike #blueanon, Pubs don't get their rocks off on meaningless show trials.

"all the Internet stuff" . . . you mean like a laptop which was deemed real by our own FBI which essentially laid out the entire playbook of The Grifters Biden? That "Internet stuff"? 

Unlike #blueanon who gets mad about phone calls and gets easily manipulated by Russian intelligence feeding a former British intelligence officer mis-information, who in turn sells that to a political campaign . . . only proving that the whole lot are the easiest marks on the planet, but somehow still managed to make continuous proclamations of having evidence of Trump-Russian COLUSION and yet producing nothing. 

Impeachment processes are traditionally protracted and thorough, and not hyper-partisan show trials.

But again, this has virtually nothing to do with the failures of Kamala Harris as "border czar"

But I'll happily keep  at your deflection.

haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Holy crap. Have a real one Dax. Haaaaaaaa

All of this because you're too embarrassed to discuss your candidates track record.

Sad 

Relative to McCarthy - I think you'll also agree that your movement is now the New McCarthyites - and his actions were widely criticized from within his own party.

Lying under oath and obstruction of justice is not an impeachable offense?  Interesting, but telling . . . noted

[sonofdaxjones]

When you're embarrassed AF that the "Border Czar" (rewrite notwithstanding) was and is an utter failure, then you search for just about anything trying to deflect away from said failure.

This is the life and times of #blueanongE

Just looking forward to the next pre-recorded interview (and likely edited) with the emotional support whack-a-doo Veep candidate holding her hand.

Good point. We should def put an obese senior citizen that lies non stop, can't talk in complete sentences and/or do grade school math in charge!!!!

Can't defend your candidate?  . . . make it about Don Trump 

dax I hope we can agree that I'm not combative with you so hopefully you can tell this is an honest inquiry. You're mocking someone for only attacking the opposing candidate, not pointing out the positives of their own. So I ask, what are the positives that Trump has done/do you expect him to do if he is elected?

I think we can all agree that the Middle East was far less of a cauldron of war then it is now, I hope for the same in 2.0

Trump correctly implored our alleged NATO ally's to stop buying energy from Russia . . . and he was proven to have been 1000% correct in trying to get them to see it that way.  Hopefully they will begin to see it as Trump correctly saw it going forward and that will hopefully bode well for U.S. Energy.   

U.S. energy production growth and expansion, I am hopeful that is also extends into Nuke power plants.

The State Department was less of a wing of the DOD/Intelligence under Trump, and more of a diplomatic body.  Hopefully that returns, because as of now, they might as well make the Pentagon a Hexagon so State can have their area.

I think Don did good work on sentencing reform, and Don said over the weekend that states need to move to legalize pot . . .  and low level crime committers should not be going to jail and that lives should not be ruined over low level crimes.

The U.S. needs to be less adversarial across the globe, the current administration is nothing but threats and that will only continue under Harris. . . I am hopeful that will change if Trump is elected

I hopeful for true border security and immigration reform.  But we can no longer allow the cartels to run our Southern border as they do now, and we can no longer allow countries to dump their criminals on us, as happens now.

Getting tough with China is not just running aircraft carriers around in the Pacific, that's doing things like making sure Federal money doesn't flow to the Chinese to do anything in the United States from an industrial perspective.  So deals like we had in Illinois and Michigan will hopefully end under Trump.  That's also shutting down anything that is merely just an extension of the Chinese government/intelligence that operates under the guise of diplomacy . . . of course everyone bites the bullet on diplomatic missions and similar, I am talking about front organizations that extend beyond the standard diplomatic norms.

[Kat Kid]

I think your engagement and diplomacy talk is noble and moving away from the US trying to assert its power across the globe for narrow reasons often ends up causing huge problems from the people we are playing games with but also ultimately for ourselves.

I’m curious why similar engagement would not ultimately be successful with China? I think we are better off engaging with China at this point and many of the short sighted moves like blocking advanced computer chips or putting tariffs on EVs will make it more likely that China develops its own very capable industries in these areas. They have already completely lapped us in EVs and solar panels and they have coherent national industrial and technology policy. 

We have a 150 year head start on higher education and a 75 year head start on cultural dominance but we should proceed with the confidence that these are big advantages not be scared about competing with China. They have much more to lose by being insular and relying on the great firewall to control their population medium to long term. Being scared that China will send spies (of course they will) so we will try to isolate the most populous country on earth that makes a ton of products seems likely to fail.

[sonofdaxjones]

Watching #blueanongE talking about Low IQ voters as their candidate . . .




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[sonofdaxjones]

I think your engagement and diplomacy talk is noble and moving away from the US trying to assert its power across the globe for narrow reasons often ends up causing huge problems from the people we are playing games with but also ultimately for ourselves.

I’m curious why similar engagement would not ultimately be successful with China? I think we are better off engaging with China at this point and many of the short sighted moves like blocking advanced computer chips or putting tariffs on EVs will make it more likely that China develops its own very capable industries in these areas. They have already completely lapped us in EVs and solar panels and they have coherent national industrial and technology policy. 

We have a 150 year head start on higher education and a 75 year head start on cultural dominance but we should proceed with the confidence that these are big advantages not be scared about competing with China. They have much more to lose by being insular and relying on the great firewall to control their population medium to long term. Being scared that China will send spies (of course they will) so we will try to isolate the most populous country on earth that makes a ton of products seems likely to fail.

What does what I said have anything to do with being scared of competing with China?  There's nothing I said that even hints on any firewall, outside of quelling what are clearly Chinese intelligence operations and stopping Federal incentive money or state/local incentive money (backed by Federal money) from flowing to Chinese corporations.

[sonofdaxjones]

Imagine talking about LowIQ voters as your candidate is once again up on stage successfully regaling a crowd of very very very low IQ voters with various fake dialects and speech patterns.

How sad . . . yet funny 

Next up, Kamala Harris at a record shop and proudly showing her selections to the cameras . . . artists that as of 11 minutes before, she had never heard of . . . 

[sonofdaxjones]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Stevesie60]

When you're embarrassed AF that the "Border Czar" (rewrite notwithstanding) was and is an utter failure, then you search for just about anything trying to deflect away from said failure.

This is the life and times of #blueanongE

Just looking forward to the next pre-recorded interview (and likely edited) with the emotional support whack-a-doo Veep candidate holding her hand.

Good point. We should def put an obese senior citizen that lies non stop, can't talk in complete sentences and/or do grade school math in charge!!!!

Can't defend your candidate?  . . . make it about Don Trump 

dax I hope we can agree that I'm not combative with you so hopefully you can tell this is an honest inquiry. You're mocking someone for only attacking the opposing candidate, not pointing out the positives of their own. So I ask, what are the positives that Trump has done/do you expect him to do if he is elected?

I think we can all agree that the Middle East was far less of a cauldron of war then it is now, I hope for the same in 2.0

Trump correctly implored our alleged NATO ally's to stop buying energy from Russia . . . and he was proven to have been 1000% correct in trying to get them to see it that way.  Hopefully they will begin to see it as Trump correctly saw it going forward and that will hopefully bode well for U.S. Energy.   

U.S. energy production growth and expansion, I am hopeful that is also extends into Nuke power plants.

The State Department was less of a wing of the DOD/Intelligence under Trump, and more of a diplomatic body.  Hopefully that returns, because as of now, they might as well make the Pentagon a Hexagon so State can have their area.

I think Don did good work on sentencing reform, and Don said over the weekend that states need to move to legalize pot . . .  and low level crime committers should not be going to jail and that lives should not be ruined over low level crimes.

The U.S. needs to be less adversarial across the globe, the current administration is nothing but threats and that will only continue under Harris. . . I am hopeful that will change if Trump is elected

I hopeful for true border security and immigration reform.  But we can no longer allow the cartels to run our Southern border as they do now, and we can no longer allow countries to dump their criminals on us, as happens now.

Getting tough with China is not just running aircraft carriers around in the Pacific, that's doing things like making sure Federal money doesn't flow to the Chinese to do anything in the United States from an industrial perspective.  So deals like we had in Illinois and Michigan will hopefully end under Trump.  That's also shutting down anything that is merely just an extension of the Chinese government/intelligence that operates under the guise of diplomacy . . . of course everyone bites the bullet on diplomatic missions and similar, I am talking about front organizations that extend beyond the standard diplomatic norms.

I appreciate you sharing this. Thanks, dax.

[steve dave]

lmao


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk