Author Topic: Possible WW3 thread  (Read 342791 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20971
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #9175 on: January 28, 2025, 10:44:26 AM »
Reagan got mocked for SDI . . . while we then developed a whole litany of anti-ballistic missile systems, and everyone with even a hint of IQ knows the military and the Defense Space Agency/Space Development Agency - DOD/Space Force/National Reconnaissance Office et. al. . . . have already weaponized space.  We send a little space shuttle up for months upon months at a time to do all kinds of secret stuff.

Bush/Cheney tore up the ABM treaty and eventually most of our arms control agreements with Russia because they wanted to pursue Star Wars 2.0. Reagan was very good on arms control overall.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30661
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #9176 on: January 28, 2025, 12:23:04 PM »
Reagan was the first coin Star Wars as an alleged legitimate defense tactic. Technology has come a little ways since then though.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30661
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #9177 on: January 28, 2025, 12:24:30 PM »
Iron Dome looked awesome in Israel, stopping 800 Bajillion Iranian drones and missiles

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 66410
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #9178 on: January 28, 2025, 12:26:19 PM »
It will really be comforting to stop all these drone and missile attacks on our kansan soil
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30661
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #9179 on: January 28, 2025, 12:29:54 PM »
I’ve been led to believe that I’m supposed to be concerned with more Americans than just Kansans . Guess I’m drinking the Kool-Aid.

Online mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39930
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #9180 on: January 28, 2025, 02:09:08 PM »
i myself am more of a chrome dome guy

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 66410
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #9181 on: January 28, 2025, 02:11:01 PM »
i myself am more of a chrome dome guy

I believe that was Nancy's initiative
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Online BIG APPLE CAT

  • smelly poor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7291
  • slide rule enthusiast
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #9182 on: January 28, 2025, 02:35:11 PM »
i myself am more of a chrome dome guy

I believe that was Nancy's initiative

The OG “spit on that thang!”

Online mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39930
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #9183 on: January 28, 2025, 03:10:40 PM »
i myself am more of a chrome dome guy

I believe that was Nancy's initiative

The OG “spit on that thang!”

yeah she was pretty old fashioned

Offline Sandstone Outcropping

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10055
  • a punk who rarely ever took advice
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #9184 on: January 28, 2025, 05:00:13 PM »
Guys, I'm not saying an Iron Dome to block Russian or Chinese nukes is a bad idea but I had been reliably informed that Russia only wants peace and only does nukings and genocides if provoked by Western Decadence and Globalist Warmongers. What is the story here???

https://x.com/atrupar/status/1884353235105853444

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 57303
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #9185 on: January 28, 2025, 05:14:54 PM »
Sandstone - An uber hegemonist neocon

I wonder where it was said that there were no #neocon pubs . . . the great thing for them, that unlike years ago, all they have to do is come as anti-Trump and they're immediately welcomed into the #blueanon-neocon fold.  :thumbsup:

1 minute the cry of war crimes . . . and the next its top shelf cocktails and off color jokes at the shrimp bowl during the big #blueanon welcome rager


Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 57303
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #9186 on: January 28, 2025, 05:31:36 PM »
As of right now, there's pretty much nothing protecting the US homeland from missile attack except MAD

I would think that would absolutely enrage #neocongE . . . but alas, #necongE will prove again and again to be nothing more than hyper-partisan derps.

I suppose had they announced that a new missile system was going to be created to go off to far off lands and kill more brown people and install terrorists as their leader, #neocongE would have been all for it.  (But probably not, cus Pubs)


Offline bucket

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9919
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #9187 on: January 28, 2025, 05:39:39 PM »
As of right now, there's pretty much nothing protecting the US homeland from missile attack except MAD

I would think that would absolutely enrage #neocongE . . . but alas, #necongE will prove again and again to be nothing more than hyper-partisan derps.

I suppose had they announced that a new missile system was going to be created to go off to far off lands and kill more brown people and install terrorists as their leader, #neocongE would have been all for it.  (But probably not, cus Pubs)

I'm not really interested in an Iron Dome unless Russia or China have, or are building, one.

Are our nukes still turned on to fire and blow up Earth if we get hit by a nuke? Deterrent enough for me.

Online Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20971
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #9188 on: January 28, 2025, 06:00:59 PM »
Iron Dome looked awesome in Israel, stopping 800 Bajillion Iranian drones and missiles

Pete, there is a difference between an intercontinental ballistic missile and a condom bomb.

Online BIG APPLE CAT

  • smelly poor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7291
  • slide rule enthusiast
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #9189 on: January 28, 2025, 07:15:02 PM »
Iron Dome looked awesome in Israel, stopping 800 Bajillion Iranian drones and missiles

Pete, there is a difference between an intercontinental ballistic missile and a condom bomb.

Bomdom

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 22603
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #9190 on: January 28, 2025, 10:05:01 PM »
As of right now, there's pretty much nothing protecting the US homeland from missile attack except MAD

I would think that would absolutely enrage #neocongE . . . but alas, #necongE will prove again and again to be nothing more than hyper-partisan derps.

I suppose had they announced that a new missile system was going to be created to go off to far off lands and kill more brown people and install terrorists as their leader, #neocongE would have been all for it.  (But probably not, cus Pubs)

I'm not really interested in an Iron Dome unless Russia or China have, or are building, one.

Are our nukes still turned on to fire and blow up Earth if we get hit by a nuke? Deterrent enough for me.

I think a more salient question is:  are Russia's?
Tapatalk-only users have small wangs that they use on their mommas. #Pete2028

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30661
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #9191 on: January 29, 2025, 09:54:31 AM »
Excellent questions to which I have zero answers. I was kind of thinking that they should be on spaceships or something, but maybe they sit on the ground? Just seems like you’re gonna wanna get one of those nukes zapped out in space before it comes back down rather than blown it up right abovethe Air Force Base or whatever.

Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6517
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #9192 on: January 29, 2025, 10:00:08 AM »
sounds cheap!

Offline bucket

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9919
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #9193 on: January 29, 2025, 10:34:16 AM »
As of right now, there's pretty much nothing protecting the US homeland from missile attack except MAD

I would think that would absolutely enrage #neocongE . . . but alas, #necongE will prove again and again to be nothing more than hyper-partisan derps.

I suppose had they announced that a new missile system was going to be created to go off to far off lands and kill more brown people and install terrorists as their leader, #neocongE would have been all for it.  (But probably not, cus Pubs)

I'm not really interested in an Iron Dome unless Russia or China have, or are building, one.

Are our nukes still turned on to fire and blow up Earth if we get hit by a nuke? Deterrent enough for me.

I think a more salient question is:  are Russia's?

Touché. I prefer disarmaments to building iron domes

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30661
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #9194 on: January 29, 2025, 10:38:24 AM »
Well sure everybody prefers disarmament. And everybody prefers cheap. The good news is that Jeff Bezos and Elon are showing that you can build this rough ridin' crap for fraction of the cost is Boeing Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, and all those other motherfuckers.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30661
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #9195 on: January 29, 2025, 10:39:09 AM »
If I were a legacy defense contractor, I would rough ridin' hate the tech bros

Online nicname

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16769
  • Deal with it.
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #9196 on: January 29, 2025, 11:19:55 AM »
As of right now, there's pretty much nothing protecting the US homeland from missile attack except MAD

I would think that would absolutely enrage #neocongE . . . but alas, #necongE will prove again and again to be nothing more than hyper-partisan derps.

I suppose had they announced that a new missile system was going to be created to go off to far off lands and kill more brown people and install terrorists as their leader, #neocongE would have been all for it.  (But probably not, cus Pubs)

I'm not really interested in an Iron Dome unless Russia or China have, or are building, one.

Are our nukes still turned on to fire and blow up Earth if we get hit by a nuke? Deterrent enough for me.

I think a more salient question is:  are Russia's?

Touché. I prefer disarmaments to building iron domes

Why settle for one when both are available?
If there was a gif of nicname thwarting the attempted-flag-taker and then gesturing him to suck it, followed by motioning for all of Hilton Shelter to boo him louder, it'd be better than that auburn gif.

Offline bucket

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9919
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #9197 on: January 29, 2025, 06:59:14 PM »
As of right now, there's pretty much nothing protecting the US homeland from missile attack except MAD

I would think that would absolutely enrage #neocongE . . . but alas, #necongE will prove again and again to be nothing more than hyper-partisan derps.

I suppose had they announced that a new missile system was going to be created to go off to far off lands and kill more brown people and install terrorists as their leader, #neocongE would have been all for it.  (But probably not, cus Pubs)

I'm not really interested in an Iron Dome unless Russia or China have, or are building, one.

Are our nukes still turned on to fire and blow up Earth if we get hit by a nuke? Deterrent enough for me.

I think a more salient question is:  are Russia's?

Touché. I prefer disarmaments to building iron domes

Why settle for one when both are available?

Tolstoy's writings on security dilemmas.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 57303
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #9198 on: January 30, 2025, 02:00:23 PM »
Based on the proclamations of Abu Mohammad al-Jolani (A US designated terrorist) - who is only hair thread away from declaring himself ruler for life.

I want to congratulate #blueanon-neocon/#neocongE for installing and creating yet another hardcore fundamentalist Islamic state in the Middle East.

Congratulations, guys  :thumbsup: