Author Topic: Possible WW3 thread  (Read 229882 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #450 on: February 22, 2022, 08:29:31 AM »
Trump fixed that dax. I remember him telling us all so.

Biden - Obama's Ukraine Point man - Putin takes Crimea

President Joe Biden - Putin moving on additional Ukraine regions.

#blueanonGe deflectobot Phil Titola - Still talking about Don Trump.

Phil and other #blueanonGe'rs will now attempt to say it was all planned under Trump, as if Vlad Putin told his military not to plan anything beyond Crimea back in 2014 or before. 




Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #451 on: February 22, 2022, 08:34:17 AM »
Look how happy dax is now that war is back on the table. It's like watching my senior dog leaping around in the snow last week.

I obviously disagree with dax's lust for war but hey, silver linings and all that
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Online Phil Titola

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15308
  • He took it out!
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #452 on: February 22, 2022, 08:35:30 AM »
Look how happy dax is now that war is back on the table. It's like watching my senior dog leaping around in the snow last week.

I obviously disagree with dax's lust for war but hey, silver linings and all that

Like a pig wallowing in crap mud.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #453 on: February 22, 2022, 08:41:13 AM »
#blueanon and #blueanonGe have been pushing Russia for decades hoping and  :pray: :pray: for a military confrontation with Russia and Biden Family Inc is chomping at the bit at the prospect of installing a stooge (again) so they can start ramping up their profit center(s) in the Ukraine (again).

Congratulations to each and all of you!!   


Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #454 on: February 22, 2022, 08:54:23 AM »
I will say this, if Hillary were President, our finest would already be on the ground in the Ukraine.    Ukrainian oligarchs were some of the biggest contributors to the Clinton Foundation money laundering operation and they'd be calling in their markers for protection.

Biden Family Inc seems to be a bit more astute and preferring a polar route approach to replacing Zelensky.




Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #455 on: February 22, 2022, 09:14:02 AM »
What makes W. #blueanon other than correctly calling Trump a piece of crap?

You said it yourself. He was correct about something.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51510
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #456 on: February 22, 2022, 09:28:16 AM »
I don't see dax cheering for war as much as cheering for putin

Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6063
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #457 on: February 22, 2022, 09:59:08 AM »
he is nothing if not consistent

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #458 on: February 22, 2022, 10:31:23 AM »
Imagine the hours spent by the crap show discussing whether to call this an invasion or an incursion.

By they are allegedly the Foreign Policy pros.


Offline Sandstone Outcropping

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8692
  • a punk who rarely ever took advice
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #459 on: February 22, 2022, 11:04:10 AM »
Peak useful idiot-ing:


Offline Sandstone Outcropping

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8692
  • a punk who rarely ever took advice
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #460 on: February 22, 2022, 11:12:58 AM »
sorry if luk'd but this reminded me that it would be awesome to be a polyglot

https://twitter.com/PhilipinDC/status/1495730338315841539?s=20&t=5BTXjOUuiLrBNQeZL1vVXA

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #461 on: February 22, 2022, 11:17:27 AM »
Peak useful idiot-ing:



We all know that #blueanon much prefers U.S. hegemony.  You proved that by voting over 170 million strong (combined) for Hillary and Biden.

 

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29281
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #462 on: February 22, 2022, 11:24:06 AM »
It seems very unwise to suggest that we do not need an alliance with Germany, or that they are not useful allies.  They allow us to park our world-ending level armaments in their country to help secure the US's own interests.  The fact that Germany doesn't pay as much as we want them to seems like a fairly small trade off for maintaining a US-world-order-keeping fighting force there. 


Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #463 on: February 22, 2022, 11:35:59 AM »
It seems very unwise to suggest that we do not need an alliance with Germany, or that they are not useful allies.  They allow us to park our world-ending level armaments in their country to help secure the US's own interests.  The fact that Germany doesn't pay as much as we want them to seems like a fairly small trade off for maintaining a US-world-order-keeping fighting force there.

The U.S. has the ability to extend forces anywhere in the world on a level that no other country can touch.

Asking the world's 4th largest economy to fulfill their economic and expenditure obligations to the NATO alliance is an extremely small ask in the grand scheme of things.     

The U.S. spends nearly $10 billion a year on its facilities in Germany.   Germany "helps" on that effort at around $150 million a year.    That doesn't even include the economic impact of 35K U.S. service members pumping millions of Euros into the German economy every year.    The 35K number doesn't include the tens of thousands of civilian personnel the U.S. pays in Germany, all amounting to billions being pumped into the German economy.

Our payback . . . Germany pumps billions into Vlad Putin's pocket, including helping to fund a pipeline that is a major point of contention for Ukraine. 






Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51510
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #464 on: February 22, 2022, 12:10:33 PM »
It seems very unwise to suggest that we do not need an alliance with Germany, or that they are not useful allies.  They allow us to park our world-ending level armaments in their country to help secure the US's own interests.  The fact that Germany doesn't pay as much as we want them to seems like a fairly small trade off for maintaining a US-world-order-keeping fighting force there.

The U.S. has the ability to extend forces anywhere in the world on a level that no other country can touch.

Asking the world's 4th largest economy to fulfill their economic and expenditure obligations to the NATO alliance is an extremely small ask in the grand scheme of things.     

The U.S. spends nearly $10 billion a year on its facilities in Germany.   Germany "helps" on that effort at around $150 million a year.    That doesn't even include the economic impact of 35K U.S. service members pumping millions of Euros into the German economy every year.    The 35K number doesn't include the tens of thousands of civilian personnel the U.S. pays in Germany, all amounting to billions being pumped into the German economy.

Our payback . . . Germany pumps billions into Vlad Putin's pocket, including helping to fund a pipeline that is a major point of contention for Ukraine.

That pipeline about to be a thing of the past.

Offline Sandstone Outcropping

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8692
  • a punk who rarely ever took advice
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #465 on: February 22, 2022, 12:19:32 PM »
It seems very unwise to suggest that we do not need an alliance with Germany, or that they are not useful allies.  They allow us to park our world-ending level armaments in their country to help secure the US's own interests.  The fact that Germany doesn't pay as much as we want them to seems like a fairly small trade off for maintaining a US-world-order-keeping fighting force there.

The U.S. has the ability to extend forces anywhere in the world on a level that no other country can touch.

Asking the world's 4th largest economy to fulfill their economic and expenditure obligations to the NATO alliance is an extremely small ask in the grand scheme of things.     

The U.S. spends nearly $10 billion a year on its facilities in Germany.   Germany "helps" on that effort at around $150 million a year.    That doesn't even include the economic impact of 35K U.S. service members pumping millions of Euros into the German economy every year.    The 35K number doesn't include the tens of thousands of civilian personnel the U.S. pays in Germany, all amounting to billions being pumped into the German economy.

Our payback . . . Germany pumps billions into Vlad Putin's pocket, including helping to fund a pipeline that is a major point of contention for Ukraine.

That pipeline about to be a thing of the past.
n00b question: who footed the bill  for building the pipeline?

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51510
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #466 on: February 22, 2022, 12:20:11 PM »
Quote
The UK will sanction five Russian banks and three "very high net worth" individuals, Johnson said in Parliament.

Vlad's bosses about to reign him in

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51510
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #467 on: February 22, 2022, 12:21:02 PM »
It seems very unwise to suggest that we do not need an alliance with Germany, or that they are not useful allies.  They allow us to park our world-ending level armaments in their country to help secure the US's own interests.  The fact that Germany doesn't pay as much as we want them to seems like a fairly small trade off for maintaining a US-world-order-keeping fighting force there.

The U.S. has the ability to extend forces anywhere in the world on a level that no other country can touch.

Asking the world's 4th largest economy to fulfill their economic and expenditure obligations to the NATO alliance is an extremely small ask in the grand scheme of things.     

The U.S. spends nearly $10 billion a year on its facilities in Germany.   Germany "helps" on that effort at around $150 million a year.    That doesn't even include the economic impact of 35K U.S. service members pumping millions of Euros into the German economy every year.    The 35K number doesn't include the tens of thousands of civilian personnel the U.S. pays in Germany, all amounting to billions being pumped into the German economy.

Our payback . . . Germany pumps billions into Vlad Putin's pocket, including helping to fund a pipeline that is a major point of contention for Ukraine.

That pipeline about to be a thing of the past.
n00b question: who footed the bill  for building the pipeline?

not the farmers who are about to blow the crap out of it if vlad thinks he gets to keep going

Online wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30432
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #468 on: February 22, 2022, 12:27:37 PM »
It seems very unwise to suggest that we do not need an alliance with Germany, or that they are not useful allies.  They allow us to park our world-ending level armaments in their country to help secure the US's own interests.  The fact that Germany doesn't pay as much as we want them to seems like a fairly small trade off for maintaining a US-world-order-keeping fighting force there.

The U.S. has the ability to extend forces anywhere in the world on a level that no other country can touch.

Asking the world's 4th largest economy to fulfill their economic and expenditure obligations to the NATO alliance is an extremely small ask in the grand scheme of things.     

The U.S. spends nearly $10 billion a year on its facilities in Germany.   Germany "helps" on that effort at around $150 million a year.    That doesn't even include the economic impact of 35K U.S. service members pumping millions of Euros into the German economy every year.    The 35K number doesn't include the tens of thousands of civilian personnel the U.S. pays in Germany, all amounting to billions being pumped into the German economy.

Our payback . . . Germany pumps billions into Vlad Putin's pocket, including helping to fund a pipeline that is a major point of contention for Ukraine.

That pipeline about to be a thing of the past.

Wut?
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51510
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #469 on: February 22, 2022, 12:39:23 PM »
I should preface it that if Russia decides on a full scale invasion the pipelines will be destroyed

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85343
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #470 on: February 22, 2022, 02:43:38 PM »
God MAGA loves Putin


Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #471 on: February 22, 2022, 02:45:27 PM »
Candace loves nationalism.

Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6063
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #472 on: February 22, 2022, 03:01:17 PM »
Quote
The UK will sanction five Russian banks and three "very high net worth" individuals, Johnson said in Parliament.

Vlad's bosses about to reign him in

interesting thing about Russia is that Putin has largely decided who could be a high net worth individual

so they kinda work for him

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 21453
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #473 on: February 22, 2022, 03:15:58 PM »
Quote
The UK will sanction five Russian banks and three "very high net worth" individuals, Johnson said in Parliament.

Vlad's bosses about to reign him in

interesting thing about Russia is that Putin has largely decided who could be a high net worth individual

so they kinda work for him

Pretty true, and the non-conforming oligarchs have absconded to the UK, Cypress, etc., being smart enough to transfer their funds to Swiss accounts and whatnot.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51510
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Possible WW3 thread
« Reply #474 on: February 22, 2022, 04:04:17 PM »
Does anyone think russia is afraid of a nato invasion?   holy crap that is pudding brain