Supreme Court Cases Thread

[Rage Against the McKee]

https://twitter.com/sethmoulton/status/1539997689148018693?s=21&t=UjcxHaVtEqUeQKv6-7juOg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This made me think of k-s-u's "per capita" rant a few years ago.

[Institutional Control]

Roe v Wade overturned.

[Justwin]

Really raises the stakes on August 2.

[bucket]

Really raises the stakes on August 2.

 

[Rage Against the McKee]

Really raises the stakes on August 2.

 

That's when Kansas will pass a constitutional amendment so they can start jailing people who have abortions.

[cfbandyman]

Yeah, basically it's up to the states now

[Dugout DickStone]

Yeah, basically it's up to the states now

Except for guns.

[420seriouscat69]

Everyone get your abortions in while you can


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[OK_Cat]

Abortions are still going to happen, it’s just that there will be more dead women in dark alleys.

But guns and stuff


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[cfbandyman]

Yeah, basically it's up to the states now

Except for guns.

Of course can't have that

[Dugout DickStone]

Abortions are still going to happen, it’s just that there will be more dead women in dark alleys.

But guns and stuff


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

yeah, LOL that certified creepster Alito will stop abortions.  He will just stop safe ones

[Rage Against the McKee]

https://twitter.com/fordm/status/1540338064324698112

[cfbandyman]

Burn it down

[WildcatNkilt]

Warm up those welfare checks and foster families!


I hope everyone that was for overturning Roe v Wade is also going to register to get licensed as a foster parent.  Those foster kid numbers are going to be insane!  Pro-life, though!   

[kstater]

Warm up those welfare checks and foster families!


I hope everyone that was for overturning Roe v Wade is also going to register to get licensed as a foster parent.  Those foster kid numbers are going to be insane!  Pro-life, though!   

Something Something bootstraps

Sent from my SM-S906U1 using Tapatalk

[Rage Against the McKee]

Yeah, basically it's up to the states now

Only until they have the votes to make abortion illegal at the federal level.

[chum1]

Yeah, basically it's up to the states now

Not really.

https://twitter.com/JaneMayerNYer/status/1540341053961666563

[DQ12]

the tension vis a vis guns/abortion is pretty interesting.  i think the Court is a little inconsistent with its rationale between the two (and I know they're different rights at issue), but still.  are we taking a tight reading of the 14th or no?  are we taking a tight reading of the 2nd or no?

likewise, i think the "abortions will still happen" argument is cousins with the pro-gunners who say "outlawing guns means only outlaws will get guns." 

i find myself nodding with a lot of what i read in the opinion today (stare decisis notwithstanding), but it seems at odds with the thrust of yesterday's big opinion.

[chum1]

Yeah, basically it's up to the states now

Only until they have the votes to make abortion illegal at the federal level.

Not wasting any time!

https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/1540345323264016385

[MadCat]

Warm up yer coat hangers

[Rage Against the McKee]

the tension vis a vis guns/abortion is pretty interesting.  i think the Court is a little inconsistent with its rationale between the two (and I know they're different rights at issue), but still.  are we taking a tight reading of the 14th or no?  are we taking a tight reading of the 2nd or no?

likewise, i think the "abortions will still happen" argument is cousins with the pro-gunners who say "outlawing guns means only outlaws will get guns." 

i find myself nodding with a lot of what i read in the opinion today (stare decisis notwithstanding), but it seems at odds with the thrust of yesterday's big opinion.

Not when you consider that they are partisan hacks. It makes perfect sense to take the republican viewpoint on both issues.

[Dugout DickStone]

the tension vis a vis guns/abortion is pretty interesting.  i think the Court is a little inconsistent with its rationale between the two (and I know they're different rights at issue), but still.  are we taking a tight reading of the 14th or no?  are we taking a tight reading of the 2nd or no?

likewise, i think the "abortions will still happen" argument is cousins with the pro-gunners who say "outlawing guns means only outlaws will get guns." 

i find myself nodding with a lot of what i read in the opinion today (stare decisis notwithstanding), but it seems at odds with the thrust of yesterday's big opinion.

Except that only total rough ridin' nitwits think anyone is actually trying to outlaw guns while states are literally outlawing abortions.

these justices went through confirmation hearings and testified under oath it was literally stare decisis.  They would not have been confirmed had they said they would overturn roe.  They are rough ridin' liars at best.

[Stupid Fitz]

https://twitter.com/fordm/status/1540338064324698112

Yeah, this is going to get interesting and by interesting, I mean bad. I'm a huge dumbass, but from what I gather is they overturned because there was no past precedent for the right. So, again, i'm a huge dumbass, but I would think that there are lots of stuff that falls in to that category that a bunch of religious weirdos would love to make illegal.

[BIG APPLE CAT]

don't worry guys, I'm sure they will stop at overturning Roe. They definitely aren't going to see how much further they can go. trust me on this one.

[Dugout DickStone]

2 of them are old and fat shits so they may not make it to outlaw inter-racial marriages.  Although reading Thomas's concurring opinion which makes marrying outside of your race illegal would be interesting