Author Topic: Unions  (Read 13482 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13775
    • View Profile
Re: Unions
« Reply #225 on: September 21, 2023, 12:30:15 PM »
Hey kk, let’s hear you defend unions now.  You are sick.

Online wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 31586
    • View Profile
Re: Unions
« Reply #226 on: September 21, 2023, 12:48:39 PM »
Keep thinking we have a hot thread about Onions
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 22568
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: Unions
« Reply #227 on: September 21, 2023, 01:00:14 PM »
Keep thinking we have a hot thread about Onions

I think that every time I see this thread pop up.
Tapatalk-only users have small wangs that they use on their mommas. #Pete2028

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20886
    • View Profile
Re: Unions
« Reply #228 on: September 21, 2023, 01:38:58 PM »
Hey kk, let’s hear you defend unions now.  You are sick.
I just did, wym?

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13775
    • View Profile
Re: Unions
« Reply #229 on: September 21, 2023, 03:30:43 PM »
you really are sick

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45567
    • View Profile
Re: Unions
« Reply #230 on: September 21, 2023, 11:29:12 PM »
Completely disregarding that UAW members aren't federal employees, apparently something this dumb [redacted] doesn't understand, he really needs a dirt nap. He's so rough ridin' stupid
https://twitter.com/therecount/status/1704133189483000158

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37339
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Unions
« Reply #231 on: September 22, 2023, 09:42:13 AM »
I will never understand how ppl can listen to politicians like that, while not being the head of a large corporation, and think that this is what they want.

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20886
    • View Profile
Re: Unions
« Reply #232 on: September 22, 2023, 09:54:54 AM »
Completely disregarding that UAW members aren't federal employees, apparently something this dumb [redacted] doesn't understand, he really needs a dirt nap. He's so rough ridin' stupid
https://twitter.com/therecount/status/1704133189483000158

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/09/22/uaw-strike-tim-scott-faces-labor-complaint-over-firing-comments.html

NLRB violation incoming

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 56691
    • View Profile
Re: Unions
« Reply #233 on: September 22, 2023, 09:58:03 AM »
Ford Fiesta Base- MSRP $72,457 with dealer additions - $81,658


Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 52823
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Unions
« Reply #234 on: September 22, 2023, 10:04:03 AM »
Ford Fiesta Base- MSRP $72,457 with dealer additions - $81,658

they still make fiestas?

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 56691
    • View Profile
Re: Unions
« Reply #235 on: September 22, 2023, 10:16:18 AM »
Apparently

Online wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 31586
    • View Profile
Re: Unions
« Reply #236 on: September 22, 2023, 10:24:37 AM »
I'm not really up to speed on auto manufacturing, are these cars not mostly assembled by robotics?
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline Justwin

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 975
    • View Profile
Re: Unions
« Reply #237 on: September 22, 2023, 10:27:04 AM »
Ford does not make the Fiesta for the US market and a base Fiesta is nowhere near $72,000 in USD.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 52823
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Unions
« Reply #238 on: September 22, 2023, 10:55:39 AM »
Ford does not make the Fiesta for the US market and a base Fiesta is nowhere near $72,000 in USD.

dang and that's good to hear.

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20233
    • View Profile
Re: Unions
« Reply #239 on: September 22, 2023, 11:04:22 AM »
I think dax was doing one of those things like the guy that tweeted about the 78$ burger at the airport the other day

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 56691
    • View Profile
Re: Unions
« Reply #240 on: September 22, 2023, 11:27:45 AM »
I'll add additional notes on the next post

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22185
    • View Profile
Re: Unions
« Reply #241 on: September 22, 2023, 12:16:56 PM »

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13775
    • View Profile
Re: Unions
« Reply #242 on: September 22, 2023, 12:24:50 PM »
Completely disregarding that UAW members aren't federal employees, apparently something this dumb [redacted] doesn't understand, he really needs a dirt nap. He's so rough ridin' stupid
https://twitter.com/therecount/status/1704133189483000158

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/09/22/uaw-strike-tim-scott-faces-labor-complaint-over-firing-comments.html

NLRB violation incoming

I don’t think a guy who has nothing to do with firing them can commit a violation lmao

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20886
    • View Profile
Re: Unions
« Reply #243 on: September 22, 2023, 12:35:05 PM »
Completely disregarding that UAW members aren't federal employees, apparently something this dumb [redacted] doesn't understand, he really needs a dirt nap. He's so rough ridin' stupid
https://twitter.com/therecount/status/1704133189483000158

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/09/22/uaw-strike-tim-scott-faces-labor-complaint-over-firing-comments.html

NLRB violation incoming

I don’t think a guy who has nothing to do with firing them can commit a violation lmao

He is an employer, so this is a threat against his employees. You don't have to be an employee to file a complaint.

The NLRB ruled against Ben Domenech who tweeted that if employees of The Federalist were to unionize he would "send them to the salt mines."  The 3rd circuit court apparently overturned that, but this seems like more straight forward on the contextual case because Tim Scott isn't joking.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/federalist-publishers-salt-mine-tweet-did-not-violate-labor-law-3rd-circ-2022-05-20/

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Unions
« Reply #244 on: September 22, 2023, 12:46:17 PM »
if a lawmaker can't discuss what changes to the law he would like to see enacted, or if a candidate for president can't discuss what executive actions he would take if elected, that seems like a pretty insane abuse of power (and that power should correspondingly be reduced or removed).
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22185
    • View Profile
Re: Unions
« Reply #245 on: September 22, 2023, 03:52:41 PM »

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20886
    • View Profile
Re: Unions
« Reply #246 on: September 22, 2023, 05:33:38 PM »
Let’s rough ridin' go!

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 66046
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Unions
« Reply #247 on: September 22, 2023, 05:34:33 PM »
Joe reads gE
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline DaBigTrain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12494
  • stuxnet, meltdown, spectre, Bitcoin, ffChamp
    • View Profile
Re: Unions
« Reply #248 on: September 22, 2023, 05:35:47 PM »
Either that or the FBI since dax is certainly on one of their lists
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"

https://blockstream.info/block/000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20886
    • View Profile
Re: Unions
« Reply #249 on: September 22, 2023, 05:36:35 PM »
if a lawmaker can't discuss what changes to the law he would like to see enacted, or if a candidate for president can't discuss what executive actions he would take if elected, that seems like a pretty insane abuse of power (and that power should correspondingly be reduced or removed).

Of course they can discuss changes to the law as long as they don’t threaten to fire workers for trying to unionize. You can advocate a change to the law without threatening to violate it.

And if you want to violate it to try and challenge it through the courts or as a means of civil disobedience, then this is step one.