That's not answering the questions I asked at all.

So very very onbrand
I've already addressed the uniparty aspect of this money laundering operation in another thread. Apparently you're very much a single lane monolithic thinker when you're not losing your mind.
USAID staff is almost exclusively democrat, the blob wonk state in DC skews heavily #blueanon
I've already addressed the fact that had USAID been kept on mission and not turned into this giant #blueanon slush fund it likely wouldn't have been touched.
You'll never ask . . . why are people like the Clinton's getting so much laundered tax payer money? (Once upon a time the Russians, Ukranians, Saudi's etc. etc. were writing them billions of dollars worth of checks. What happened?)