The Biden (interim) Dictator

[LickNeckey]

Imagine a legal team pursuing an argument advantageous to their client.

wild

[Spracne]

Imagine a legal team pursuing an argument advantageous to their client.

wild

Lol. I was gonna say ...

Dax, what is it you think lawyers do? But it's a moot point now, because he cut a plea deal. But continue seething and coping.

[Dugout DickStone]

man why the hell did he plead guilty to that diversion then

lmfao

[sonofdaxjones]

Imagine a legal team pursuing an argument advantageous to their client.

wild

Lol. I was gonna say ...

Dax, what is it you think lawyers do? But it's a moot point now, because he cut a plea deal. But continue seething and coping.

This is a classic #blueanongE/purposelyobtusegE response.

We have one perpetual derp who thinks my discussion about this is because I'm mad about the plea deal.  Every non derp on this planet knew that they weren't going to do anything serious to Deadbeat Dad Biden. 

Then we get into the single lane thinkers of #blogkaren and #slowdug who continually attempt (badly) to show that they're super smart.  Both (edit) want to dwell strictly in the domain of the basic mechanisms and the rudimentary principles of legal defense.  Both are absolutely hammering the basics and most obvious points with extreme prejudice.

Neither one will touch the optics and the potential political fallout (and the subsequent hilarious defense thereof by #blueanon/#blueanongE - components that we're already seeing now) of the son of one of the most (virtue signaling) gun control/anti-gun ownership President's in modern American history. Having his defense team getting all charges dismissed based on the (un) constitutionality of Federal gun laws and backed by recent very pro-gun court rulings of which one was handed down by a conservative leaning SCOTUS that #blueanon hates with the power of 10,000 suns.  That ruling was assailed by the very (virtue signaling) anti-gun President whose son was about ready to mount a defense using those court rulings to have all charges against him thrown out. 

[LickNeckey]

sorry nobody wants to talk about your wet dream Dax

[Spracne]

I can't get over the fact that he's all in a tither about a theorized defense that was never raised. Then Hunter admitted guilt for the gun charge. I'm sorry the "optics" hurt your little feel feels, dax 

Also, the recent SCOTUS precedent has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with the charging statute involved. I'm sure you knew that (*travels back to the 90s*), NOT!!!

You're seriously pissing yourself over a rumored defense that Hunter's counsel purportedly considered raising IF a full-blown trial happened? This is absurd on so many levels. Be better.

[Dugout DickStone]

It’s gotta be a talking point on some old moron board someplace.

I’d bet pleaded to a diversion came from there too because that’s some next level idiocy that I can’t believe dax thought.

[mocat]

pleaded guilty to a diversion is one of my all time favorites

[sonofdaxjones]

I can't get over the fact that he's all in a tither about a theorized defense that was never raised. Then Hunter admitted guilt for the gun charge. I'm sorry the "optics" hurt your little feel feels, dax 

Also, the recent SCOTUS precedent has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with the charging statute involved. I'm sure you knew that (*travels back to the 90s*), NOT!!!

You're seriously pissing yourself over a rumored defense that Hunter's counsel purportedly considered raising IF a full-blown trial happened? This is absurd on so many levels. Be better.

A rumored defense 

Once again, more meat to the allegations that the NYT's is just a giant pile of derp ass liars who are not to be believed at all, about anything. 

Sadly, if this was reported about a conservative, #blogkaren and the whole of #blueanongE would believe it 1000% to the absolute core of their being.

Biden's lawyers "invoked".  Biden's lawyers "cited" . . . all lies!!  #blogkaren

They're invoking and citing cases that do not apply to the Hunter Biden case?  Why? 

Defense teams never show a few cards to get the prosecution to back off and just accept a plea deal . . . #blogkaren

Imagine Merrick Garland knowing the platform of his DOJ and that of the executive branch regarding guns but still allowing this case to proceed to court where the President's kid and his legal team will move that multiple Federal gun laws are unconstitutional.   That's the Triple Lindy of self owns.

Instead of flailing like a carp on the bottom of a hot aluminum boat.  Why doesn't #blogkaren and the rest of #blueanon join me and congratulating Pedo Pete and Hunter for the absolute beat down they issued to Pedo Pete's own DOJ.

[Spracne]

Can I get a Pacer link? Or even a case number so I can look it up myself?

[sonofdaxjones]

 

Your utter inability to grasp the political ramifications while attempting to wrap up that reality into the mechanisms and procedures of the courts themselves is truly a sight to behold.

[sys]

https://twitter.com/LPDonovan/status/1671151763154522112

[sonofdaxjones]

Neither apply to anything I'm saying. 

[Spracne]

Your utter inability to grasp the political ramifications while attempting to wrap up that reality into the mechanisms and procedures of the courts themselves is truly a sight to behold.

The political ramifications of dipshits like you spreading dipshit crap? There's really nothing we can do about that in the year of our lord 2023.

[sonofdaxjones]

Your utter inability to grasp the political ramifications while attempting to wrap up that reality into the mechanisms and procedures of the courts themselves is truly a sight to behold.

The political ramifications of dipshits like you spreading dipshit crap? There's really nothing we can do about that in the year of our lord 2023.

We already know your position is that one of the #blueanon publications of record, a veritable "go to" for all things #blueanon has made this all up.  Literally pulled all of this "invoking" and "citing" straight out of their ass.

I am fascinated to know why the NYT's would fabricate such a tall tale, maybe you can explain.

[Dugout DickStone]

Can I get a Pacer link? Or even a case number so I can look it up myself?

lol he knows wtf Pacer is.

[sonofdaxjones]

 

Attorney's that can't figure out how to look up court records 

[Dugout DickStone]

https://twitter.com/LPDonovan/status/1671151763154522112

true lol

[sonofdaxjones]

DeflectoconsgE . . . still utterly incapable of tackling the political component and optics of the anti-gun President's kid going to court to argue that certain Federal gun laws are unconstitutional. 

[Spracne]

Your utter inability to grasp the political ramifications while attempting to wrap up that reality into the mechanisms and procedures of the courts themselves is truly a sight to behold.

The political ramifications of dipshits like you spreading dipshit crap? There's really nothing we can do about that in the year of our lord 2023.

We already know your position is that one of the #blueanon publications of record, a veritable "go to" for all things #blueanon has made this all up.  Literally pulled all of this "invoking" and "citing" straight out of their ass.

I am fascinated to know why the NYT's would fabricate such a tall tale, maybe you can explain.

All I've read are the primary sources. Say it with me dax: primary sources.

[sonofdaxjones]

Let's breakdown the article that #blogkaren says is just a pile of fabrications and lies:

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/31/us/politics/hunter-biden-bruen-justice-department.html?searchResultPosition=1

In the months after the court’s landmark ruling that gave people a broad right to carry guns outside the home, Mr. Biden’s lawyers told Justice Department prosecutors — who were investigating whether to charge him in connection with a gun purchase — that a prosecution of him would likely be ruled moot, according to two people briefed on the matter.

Why are Glen Thrush and Michael Schmidt of the New York Times spreading such faleshoods?  Any thoughts #blogkaren?

[Spracne]

To quote another one of my heroes, "What difference could it possibly make?"

[sonofdaxjones]

The byline
Hunter Biden’s legal team is invoking a Supreme Court decision his father has denounced as an affront to “common sense and the Constitution.”

Setting aside the utter pile of lies and falsehood being propagated by a #blueanon publication of record (as long as they're saying bad things about a conservative)

Too who/whom or what would Biden's lawyers be "invoking"?  Clouds?

[sonofdaxjones]

To quote another one of my heroes, "What difference could it possibly make?"

#blueanon loves it when people die, arms get shipped to other countries and 100's of thousands of people are killed and millions more get refugee'd.

That's already understood you sick ghoul.

But tapout accepted none-the-less

[Spracne]

Lawyers posture and make arguments in negotiations. I have now seen the light! Hunter has pleaded guilty, though.