Author Topic: The Biden (interim) Dictator  (Read 575778 times)

TaqMan and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59606
    • View Profile
Re: The Biden (interim) Dictator
« Reply #5825 on: October 25, 2022, 11:33:15 AM »

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59606
    • View Profile
Re: The Biden (interim) Dictator
« Reply #5826 on: October 25, 2022, 02:29:42 PM »
https://observer.com/2016/08/breaking-chinese-mole-uncovered-inside-the-fbi/

Too busy chasing piss tapes . . . and offering millions for unsubstantiated whack-a-doo conspiracies.   :frown:

Chun admitted that, from 2011 to 2016, he passed sensitive information to a Chinese official whom he knew to be a government representative, i.e. a spy. Among the classified information he passed included the identity and travel plans of an FBI agent, an internal organizational chart, plus photos taken by Chun of documents in a restricted area related to surveillance technology.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59606
    • View Profile
Re: The Biden (interim) Dictator
« Reply #5827 on: October 27, 2022, 02:03:55 PM »
This should be cross posted in the World War III

It appears that our lying ass President, who promised as candidate Biden that the U.S. would only use nuclear weapons to retaliate against the use of nuclear weapons against the U.S. or our allies . . . will now be implementing a policy of potential nuclear use against a conventional forces adversary.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-10-27/us-still-may-use-nuclear-weapons-against-non-nuclear-threats-pentagon-says?leadSource=uverify%20wall

Barry Obama (Nobel Peace Prize winner  :lol: ) signed off on the largest expenditure on nuclear weapons and delivery systems in world history.  Now his piss boy changes policy on nuclear use in a conventional war.

The #neocons are clearly in control.  Congrats #neocongE  :thumbsup:

Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7076
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile

Online mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40545
    • View Profile
Re: The Biden (interim) Dictator
« Reply #5829 on: October 27, 2022, 03:08:06 PM »
good grief, lickneckey, never get in the way of a 7 post heater

Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7076
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile
Re: The Biden (interim) Dictator
« Reply #5830 on: October 27, 2022, 03:10:03 PM »
apologies

i didn't realize the gravity of the situation

I was on twitter and came across a wackyDax talking point and felt like this was the best place

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53913
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: The Biden (interim) Dictator
« Reply #5831 on: October 27, 2022, 03:26:18 PM »
now we will never see greatness

Offline Katpappy

  • I got my eye on you
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13335
  • Party on gE
    • View Profile
Re: The Biden (interim) Dictator
« Reply #5832 on: October 27, 2022, 03:35:06 PM »
Don't worry, just bait the water.  :Take the Bait:
Hot time in Kat town tonight.


Offline DaBigTrain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12724
  • stuxnet, meltdown, spectre, Bitcoin, ffChamp
    • View Profile
Re: The Biden (interim) Dictator
« Reply #5834 on: October 27, 2022, 06:12:37 PM »
good grief, lickneckey, never get in the way of a 7 post heater
I was thinking the same thing :lol:
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"

https://blockstream.info/block/000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59606
    • View Profile
Re: The Biden (interim) Dictator
« Reply #5835 on: October 27, 2022, 09:41:00 PM »
Deflectocon(s)gE isn't going to touch the crap show in the Oval Office.

Sad




Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59606
    • View Profile
Re: The Biden (interim) Dictator
« Reply #5836 on: October 27, 2022, 09:41:25 PM »
good grief, lickneckey, never get in the way of a 7 post heater
I was thinking the same thing :lol:

ragequitter


Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59606
    • View Profile
Re: The Biden (interim) Dictator
« Reply #5838 on: October 27, 2022, 09:43:46 PM »
good grief, lickneckey, never get in the way of a 7 post heater

Dates and time often confuse some people.  @mocat for example

Online catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16050
    • View Profile

Offline DreamWeaver69

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2128
    • View Profile
Re: The Biden (interim) Dictator
« Reply #5840 on: October 27, 2022, 11:02:21 PM »
You’ve never been dirt poor.


Offline Justwin

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1149
    • View Profile
Re: The Biden (interim) Dictator
« Reply #5842 on: October 28, 2022, 10:05:52 AM »
Good argument to be made that Biden is responsible for an even larger share of inflation than just the disastrous stimulus plan he put in place in the spring of 2021.

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/how-biden-could-have-warded-off-inflation-183644063.html

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38085
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: The Biden (interim) Dictator
« Reply #5843 on: October 28, 2022, 10:27:09 AM »
Heard on a news pod last week that increase in corporate profits account for 53% of inflation since beginning of Covid. They guy they were interviewing said the the last couple times we have had large and fast inflation, corporate profits accounted for 11% and 13%.

So, it sounds like this is the market doing it’s thing in a large way. If that’s the case, you guys would be better off railing for market regulation.

Offline Justwin

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1149
    • View Profile
Re: The Biden (interim) Dictator
« Reply #5844 on: October 28, 2022, 10:30:37 AM »
It's possible that 53% of inflation went to corporate profits, but that doesn't mean corporate profit increases were the cause of inflation. They were the result.

What sort of market regulation you have in mind?

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38085
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: The Biden (interim) Dictator
« Reply #5845 on: October 28, 2022, 10:35:34 AM »
It's possible that 53% of inflation went to corporate profits, but that doesn't mean corporate profit increases were the cause of inflation. They were the result.

What sort of market regulation you have in mind?

This news show specifically said that 53% of inflation was due to companies raising prices to bolster profits.  (show was Breaking Points, and I think it was Monday's show).

Offline Justwin

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1149
    • View Profile
Re: The Biden (interim) Dictator
« Reply #5846 on: October 28, 2022, 10:47:03 AM »
It's possible that 53% of inflation went to corporate profits, but that doesn't mean corporate profit increases were the cause of inflation. They were the result.

What sort of market regulation you have in mind?

This news show specifically said that 53% of inflation was due to companies raising prices to bolster profits.  (show was Breaking Points, and I think it was Monday's show).

You have a very tenuous grip on economics.

Online catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16050
    • View Profile
The Biden (interim) Dictator
« Reply #5847 on: October 28, 2022, 11:02:16 AM »
Good argument to be made that Biden is responsible for an even larger share of inflation than just the disastrous stimulus plan he put in place in the spring of 2021.

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/how-biden-could-have-warded-off-inflation-183644063.html
Am I missing something? The argument here is that the Fed should have raised rates way sooner. Then it notes Powell was a Trump appointee apparently desperate to keep his job, and yet it glosses over how Trump very openly pressured Powell to not raise rates during his presidency?

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38085
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: The Biden (interim) Dictator
« Reply #5848 on: October 28, 2022, 11:24:21 AM »
It's possible that 53% of inflation went to corporate profits, but that doesn't mean corporate profit increases were the cause of inflation. They were the result.

What sort of market regulation you have in mind?

This news show specifically said that 53% of inflation was due to companies raising prices to bolster profits.  (show was Breaking Points, and I think it was Monday's show).

You have a very tenuous grip on economics.

Perhaps.  Just regurgitating what was stated.