Author Topic: The Biden (interim) Dictator (Read 576311 times)

Spracne · « **Reply #5800 on:** October 21, 2022, 09:33:37 PM »

Can we all agree that Wacky hates Clay Travis, as he has repeatedly said?

DreamWeaver69 · « **Reply #5801 on:** October 21, 2022, 09:39:01 PM »

How’s Austin tonight, Spracs?

DreamWeaver69 · « **Reply #5802 on:** October 21, 2022, 09:44:31 PM »

Friday night in the new tech boom of the world. Surely you’re not on a K-State board, trying to rally the troops behind Biden, as a KU and Texas grad. No way that’s possible!

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #5803 on:** October 21, 2022, 09:57:52 PM »

Quote from: catastrophe on October 21, 2022, 09:31:10 PM

Can we all agree that no one Biden’s age or older should be eligible to run for president?

I think a publicly administered and timed competency test with an oral exam portion could provide a way to “test in” as an exception but yes, hard cutoff at 70-72 ish

Spracne · « **Reply #5804 on:** October 21, 2022, 10:03:30 PM »

Quote from: DreamWeaver69 on October 21, 2022, 09:39:01 PM

How’s Austin tonight, Spracs?

I'm away from Austin. Traveling. Watching some football and will probs throw on some Netflix soon. Any good recs?

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #5805 on:** October 21, 2022, 10:27:20 PM »

Quote from: Dugout DickStone on October 21, 2022, 09:57:52 PM

Quote from: catastrophe on October 21, 2022, 09:31:10 PM
Can we all agree that no one Biden’s age or older should be eligible to run for president?

I think a publicly administered and timed competency test with an oral exam portion could provide a way to “test in” as an exception but yes, hard cutoff at 70-72 ish

The problem with the literacy test is that you wouldn't be able to trust the results. Look at the doctors who gave Trump a clean bill of health and lied about his obesity.

DreamWeaver69 · « **Reply #5806 on:** October 21, 2022, 10:45:19 PM »

Quote from: Rage Against the McKee on October 21, 2022, 10:27:20 PM

Quote from: Dugout DickStone on October 21, 2022, 09:57:52 PM
Quote from: catastrophe on October 21, 2022, 09:31:10 PM
Can we all agree that no one Biden’s age or older should be eligible to run for president?

I think a publicly administered and timed competency test with an oral exam portion could provide a way to “test in” as an exception but yes, hard cutoff at 70-72 ish

The problem with the literacy test is that you wouldn't be able to trust the results. Look at the doctors who gave Trump a clean bill of health and lied about his obesity.

He was cleaner than the #WRPOAT. He still continues to be unfortunately. You have no answer for Trump other than a washed up puppet. Why would anyone vote for that? I’m literally asking… Kamala is terrible too. Who’s next?

catastrophe · « **Reply #5807 on:** October 21, 2022, 10:47:54 PM »

Quote from: Dugout DickStone on October 21, 2022, 09:57:52 PM

Quote from: catastrophe on October 21, 2022, 09:31:10 PM
Can we all agree that no one Biden’s age or older should be eligible to run for president?

I think a publicly administered and timed competency test with an oral exam portion could provide a way to “test in” as an exception but yes, hard cutoff at 70-72 ish

Person camera man television

DreamWeaver69 · « **Reply #5808 on:** October 21, 2022, 10:50:40 PM »

Quote from: catastrophe on October 21, 2022, 10:47:54 PM

Quote from: Dugout DickStone on October 21, 2022, 09:57:52 PM
Quote from: catastrophe on October 21, 2022, 09:31:10 PM
Can we all agree that no one Biden’s age or older should be eligible to run for president?

I think a publicly administered and timed competency test with an oral exam portion could provide a way to “test in” as an exception but yes, hard cutoff at 70-72 ish
Person camera man television

You voted for him tho!

DreamWeaver69 · « **Reply #5809 on:** October 21, 2022, 10:53:32 PM »

You all found a way to play victim to the 2016 outcome by voting for a guy who should be in a retirement home and continue to bump old crap to get through it. #WRPOAT

Spracne · « **Reply #5810 on:** October 21, 2022, 11:00:22 PM »

DreamWeaver69 · « **Reply #5811 on:** October 21, 2022, 11:30:01 PM »

Better economy and more sober.

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #5812 on:** October 22, 2022, 07:43:00 AM »

Biden is a huge improvement over Trump.

DreamWeaver69 · « **Reply #5813 on:** October 22, 2022, 07:49:57 AM »

Ratings say otherwise

catastrophe · « **Reply #5814 on:** October 22, 2022, 08:37:10 AM »

Quote from: DreamWeaver69 on October 21, 2022, 10:50:40 PM

Quote from: catastrophe on October 21, 2022, 10:47:54 PM
Quote from: Dugout DickStone on October 21, 2022, 09:57:52 PM
Quote from: catastrophe on October 21, 2022, 09:31:10 PM
Can we all agree that no one Biden’s age or older should be eligible to run for president?

I think a publicly administered and timed competency test with an oral exam portion could provide a way to “test in” as an exception but yes, hard cutoff at 70-72 ish
Person camera man television
You voted for him tho!

If we had the age limitation, I would not have voted for Biden.

MakeItRain · « **Reply #5815 on:** October 22, 2022, 12:47:49 PM »

Quote from: Spracne on October 21, 2022, 09:33:37 PM

Can we all agree that Wacky hates Clay Travis, as he has repeatedly said?

This board is the only place I see his tweets.

MakeItRain · « **Reply #5816 on:** October 22, 2022, 12:49:16 PM »

Quote from: DreamWeaver69 on October 21, 2022, 10:50:40 PM

Quote from: catastrophe on October 21, 2022, 10:47:54 PM
Quote from: Dugout DickStone on October 21, 2022, 09:57:52 PM
Quote from: catastrophe on October 21, 2022, 09:31:10 PM
Can we all agree that no one Biden’s age or older should be eligible to run for president?

I think a publicly administered and timed competency test with an oral exam portion could provide a way to “test in” as an exception but yes, hard cutoff at 70-72 ish
Person camera man television
You voted for him tho!

You did you, remember?